Mathematical Analysis Homework

import%20marimo%0A%0A__generated_with%20%3D%20%220.17.6%22%0Aapp%20%3D%20marimo.App()%0A%0A%0A%40app.cell%0Adef%20_()%3A%0A%20%20%20%20import%20marimo%20as%20mo%0A%20%20%20%20return%20(mo%2C)%0A%0A%0A%40app.cell%0Adef%20_(mo)%3A%0A%20%20%20%20nav_menu%20%3D%20mo.nav_menu(%0A%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%7B%0A%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%22%2Findex.html%22%3A%20f%22%7Bmo.icon('lucide%3Ahome')%7D%20Home%22%2C%0A%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%7D%2C%0A%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20orientation%3D%22vertical%22%2C%0A%20%20%20%20)%0A%20%20%20%20nav_menu%0A%20%20%20%20return%0A%0A%0A%40app.cell%0Adef%20_(mo)%3A%0A%20%20%20%20mo.md(r%22%22%22%0A%20%20%20%20%23%20Fall%20Semester%20Homework%201%0A%20%20%20%20%22%22%22)%0A%20%20%20%20return%0A%0A%0A%40app.cell%0Adef%20_(mo)%3A%0A%20%20%20%20mo.md(r%22%22%22%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Problem%20A%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**We%20introduce%20the%20lexicographic%20order%20on%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D%20%5Ctimes%20%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D%24.%20We%20say%20%24(p_1%2C%20q_1)%20%5Cle%20(p_2%2C%20q_2)%24%20if%20either%20%24(p_1%20%3C%20p_2)%24%20or%20%24(p_1%20%3D%20p_2%24%20and%20%24q_1%20%5Cle%20q_2)%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Here%20%24%5Cle%24%20means%20less%20or%20equal%20and%20%24%3C%24%20means%20strictly%20less.%20in%20the%20usual%20sense**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%201.%20**Show%20that%20the%20lexicographic%20relation%20is%20indeed%20an%20order%20relation**%3B%0A%20%20%20%202.%20**Show%20that%20any%20two%20pairs%20can%20be%20compared%2C%20i.e.%20we%20can%20determine%20which%20is%20less%20than%20the%20other.%20We%20then%20say%20that%20the%20set%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D%20%5Ctimes%20%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D%24%20is%20totally%20ordered**%3B%0A%20%20%20%203.%20**Sketch%20how%20to%20generalize%20this%20relation%20for%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D%5Ek%2C%20k%20%5Cge%202%24%3F%20What%20if%20the%20product%20is%20over%20infinitely%20many%20copies%20of%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D%24%20(infinite%20words)**%3F%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%201.%20Let%20%24%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%24%20be%20the%20relation%20on%20%24(%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D%20%5Ctimes%20%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D)%20%5Ctimes%20(%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D%20%5Ctimes%20%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D)%24%20defined%20above.%0A%20%20%20%20%09I.e.%20%24%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%20%3D%20%5Clbrace%20((p_1%2C%20q_1)%2C%20(p_2%2C%20q_2))%20%7C%20(p_1%20%3C%20p_2)%20%5Ctext%7Bor%7D(p_1%20%3D%20p_2%20%5Ctext%7Band%7Dq_1%20%5Cle%20q_2)%20%5Crbrace%24.%0A%20%20%20%20%09Then%3A%0A%20%20%20%20%091.%20%24%5Cforall%20(p%2C%20q)%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D%20%5Ctimes%20%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D%24%2C%20clearly%20%24p%20%3D%20p%24%20and%20%24q%20%5Cle%20q%24%2C%20thus%20%24((p%2C%20q)%2C%20(p%2C%20q))%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%24%20and%20reflexivity%20holds%3B%0A%20%20%20%20%092.%20If%20%24((p_1%2C%20q_1)%2C%20(p_2%2C%20q_2))%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%24%20and%20%24((p_2%2C%20q_2)%2C%20(p_1%2C%20q_1))%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%24%2C%20then%3A%0A%20%20%20%20%09%091.%20If%20%24p_1%20%3C%20p_2%24%20then%20%24p_2%20%3E%20p_1%20%5Cimplies%20((p_2%2C%20q_2)%2C%20(p_1%2C%20q_1))%20%5Cnotin%20%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%24%2C%20similarly%20if%20%24p_2%20%3C%20p_1%24%20then%20%24p_1%20%3E%20p_2%20%5Cimplies%20((p_1%2C%20q_1)%2C%20(p_2%2C%20q_2))%20%5Cnotin%20%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%24%20Thus%20%24p_1%20%3D%20p_2%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%20%09%092.%20Under%20the%20condition%20that%20%24p_1%20%3D%20p_2%24%2C%20if%20%24q_1%20%3C%20q_2%24%20then%20%24q_2%20%3E%20q_1%20%5Cimplies%20((p_2%2C%20q_2)%2C%20(p_1%2C%20q_1))%20%5Cnotin%20%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%24%2C%20similarly%20if%20%24q_2%20%3C%20q_1%24%20then%20%24q_1%20%3E%20q_2%20%5Cimplies%20((p_1%2C%20q_1)%2C%20(p_2%2C%20q_2))%20%5Cnotin%20%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%24.%20Thus%20%24q_1%20%3D%20q_2%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%09%09Thus%20%24(p_1%2C%20q_1)%20%3D%20(p_2%2C%20q_2)%24%20and%20anti-symmetry%20holds%3B%0A%20%20%20%20%093.%20If%20%24((p_1%2C%20q_1)%2C%20(p_2%2C%20q_2))%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%24%20and%20%24((p_2%2C%20q_2)%2C%20(p_3%2C%20q_3))%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%24%2C%20then%20either%3A%201.%20%24p_1%20%3C%20p_2%24%20and%20%24p_2%20%3C%20p_3%24%20thus%20%24p_1%20%3C%20p_3%24%20or%3B%202.%20%24p_1%20%3C%20p_2%24%20and%20%24p_2%20%3D%20p_3%24%20and%20%24q_2%20%5Cle%20q_3%24%20thus%20%24p_1%20%3C%20p_3%24%20or%3B%203.%20%24p_1%20%3D%20p_2%24%20and%20%24q_1%20%5Cle%20q_2%24%20and%20%24p_2%20%3C%20p_3%24%20thus%20%24p_1%20%3C%20p_3%24%20or%3B%204.%20%24p_1%20%3D%20p_2%24%20and%20%24q_1%20%5Cle%20q_2%24%20and%20%24p_2%20%3D%20p_3%24%20and%20%24q_2%20%5Cle%20q_3%24%20thus%20%24p_1%20%3D%20p_3%24%20and%20%24q_1%20%5Cle%20q_3%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%09Thus%20in%20either%20case%20%24((p_1%2C%20q_1)%2C%20(p_3%2C%20q_3))%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%24%20and%20thus%20transitivity%20holds.%0A%20%20%20%20%09Thus%20%24%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%24%20is%20an%20order%20relation%3B%0A%20%20%20%202.%20%24%5Cforall%20(p_1%2C%20q_1)%2C%20(p_2%2C%20q_2)%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D%20%5Ctimes%20%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D%24%3A%0A%20%20%20%20%091.%20If%20%24p_1%20%3C%20p_2%24%20then%20%24((p_1%2C%20q_1)%2C%20(p_2%2C%20q_2))%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%24%2C%20i.e.%20%24(p_1%2C%20q_1)%20%5Cle%20(p_2%2C%20q_2)%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%20%092.%20If%20%24p_2%20%3C%20p_1%24%20then%20%24((p_2%2C%20q_2)%2C%20(p_1%2C%20q_1))%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%24%2C%20i.e.%20%24(p_2%2C%20q_2)%20%5Cle%20(p_1%2C%20q_1)%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%20%093.%20If%20%24p_1%20%3D%20p_2%24%3A%201.%20If%20%24q_1%20%5Cle%20q_2%24%20then%20%24((p_1%2C%20q_1)%2C%20(p_2%2C%20q_2))%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%24%2C%20i.e.%20%24(p_1%2C%20q_1)%20%5Cle%20(p_2%2C%20q_2)%24%3B%202.%20If%20%24q_2%20%3C%20q_1%24%20then%20%24((p_2%2C%20q_2)%2C%20(p_1%2C%20q_1))%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%24%2C%20i.e.%20%24(p_2%2C%20q_2)%20%5Cle%20(p_1%2C%20q_1)%24%3B%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%09The%20above%20argument%20listed%20all%20possible%20situation%20for%20two%20pairs%20in%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D%20%5Ctimes%20%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D%24.%20Thus%20any%20two%20pairs%20can%20be%20compared%3B%0A%20%20%20%203.%20We%20may%20define%20the%20lexicographic%20order%20on%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D%5Ek%24%20by%3A%20%24(p_1%5E1%2C%20p_1%5E2%2C%20%5Cdots%2C%20p_1%5Ek)%20%5Cle%20(p_2%5E1%2C%20p_2%5E2%2C%20%5Cdots%2C%20p_2%5Ek)%24%20if%20either%20%24(p_1%5E1%20%3C%20p_2%5E1)%20%5Ctext%7B%20or%20%7D%20(p_1%5E1%20%3D%20p_2%5E1%24%20and%20%24(p_1%5E2%2C%20%5Cdots%2C%20p_1%5Ek)%20%5Cle%20(p_2%5E2%2C%20%5Cdots%2C%20p_2%5Ek)%24%20by%20the%20lexicographic%20order%20on%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D%5E%7Bk-1%7D)%24.%0A%20%20%20%20%09In%20the%20infinite%20case%2C%20let%20%24P%20%3D%20(p_1%2C%20p_2%2C%20p_3%2C%20%5Cdots)%20%3D%20p_1%20p_2%20p_3%20%5Cdots%24%20and%20%24Q%20%3D%20q_1%20q_2%20q_3%20%5Cdots%24%20be%20two%20infinite%20words.%20Then%3A%20%24P%20%5Cle%20Q%24%20if%20either%20%24%5Cexists%20t%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D_%2B%20%2B%20%5Clbrace%200%20%5Crbrace%24%20such%20that%20%24p_i%20%3D%20q_i%2C%20%5Cforall%20i%20%5Cle%20t%24%20and%20%24p_%7Bi%2B1%7D%20%3C%20q_%7Bi%2B1%7D%24%20and%20%24p_i%20%3D%20q_i%2C%20%5Cforall%20i%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Problem%20B%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**We%20introduce%20the%20coordinate-wise%20order%20on%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D%20%5Ctimes%20%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D%24.%20We%20say%20%24(p_1%2C%20q_1)%20%5Cle%20(p_2%2C%20q_2)%24%20if%20%24(p_1%20%5Cle%20p_2)%24%20and%20%24(q_1%20%5Cle%20q_2)%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%201.%20**Show%20that%20this%20relation%20is%20indeed%20an%20order%20relation**%3B%0A%20%20%20%202.%20**Show%20that%20NOT%20any%20two%20pairs%20can%20be%20compared.%20We%20say%20that%20the%20set%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D%20%5Ctimes%20%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D%24%20is%20partially%20ordered**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%201.%20Let%20%24%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%24%20be%20the%20relation%20on%20%24(%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D%20%5Ctimes%20%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D)%20%5Ctimes%20(%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D%20%5Ctimes%20%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D)%24%20defined%20above.%0A%20%20%20%20%09I.e.%20%24%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%20%3D%20%5Clbrace%20((p_1%2C%20q_1)%2C%20(p_2%2C%20q_2))%20%7C%20(p_1%20%5Cle%20p_2)%20%5Ctext%7B%20and%20%7D%20(q_1%20%5Cle%20q_2)%20%5Crbrace%24.%0A%20%20%20%20%09Then%3A%0A%20%20%20%20%091.%20%24%5Cforall%20(p%2C%20q)%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D%20%5Ctimes%20%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D%24%2C%20clearly%20%24p%20%5Cle%20p%24%20and%20%24q%20%5Cle%20q%24%2C%20thus%20%24((p%2C%20q)%2C%20(p%2C%20q))%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%24%2C%20thus%20reflexivity%20holds%3B%0A%20%20%20%20%092.%20If%20%24((p_1%2C%20q_1)%2C%20(p_2%2C%20q_2))%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%24%20and%20%24((p_2%2C%20q_2)%2C%20(p_1%2C%20q_1))%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%24%2C%20then%3A%0A%20%20%20%20%09%091.%20If%20%24p_1%20%3C%20p_2%24%20then%20%24p_2%20%3E%20p_1%20%5Cimplies%20((p_2%2C%20q_2)%2C%20(p_1%2C%20q_1))%20%5Cnotin%20%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%24%2C%20similarly%20if%20%24p_2%20%3C%20p_1%24%20then%20%24p_1%20%3E%20p_2%20%5Cimplies%20((p_1%2C%20q_1)%2C%20(p_2%2C%20q_2))%20%5Cnotin%20%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%24.%20Thus%20%24p_1%20%3D%20p_2%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%20%09%092.%20Under%20the%20condition%20that%20%24p_1%20%3D%20p_2%24%2C%20if%20%24q_1%20%3C%20q_2%24%20then%20%24q_2%20%3E%20q_1%20%5Cimplies%20((p_2%2C%20q_2)%2C%20(p_1%2C%20q_1))%20%5Cnotin%20%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%24%2C%20similarly%20if%20%24q_2%20%3C%20q_1%24%20then%20%24q_1%20%3E%20q_2%20%5Cimplies%20((p_1%2C%20q_1)%2C%20(p_2%2C%20q_2))%20%5Cnotin%20%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%24.%20Thus%20%24q_1%20%3D%20q_2%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%09%09Thus%20anti-symmetry%20holds%3B%0A%20%20%20%20%093.%20If%20%24((p_1%2C%20q_1)%2C%20(p_2%2C%20q_2))%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%24%20and%20%24((p_2%2C%20q_2)%2C%20(p_3%2C%20q_3))%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%24%2C%20then%20%24p_1%20%5Cle%20p_2%24%20and%20%24q_1%20%5Cle%20q_2%24%20and%20%24p_2%20%5Cle%20p_3%24%20and%20%24q_2%20%5Cle%20q_3%24%20thus%20%24p_1%20%5Cle%20p_3%24%20and%20%24q_1%20%5Cle%20q_3%24.%20Thus%20%24((p_1%2C%20q_1)%2C%20(p_3%2C%20q_3))%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%24%20and%20thus%20transitivity%20holds.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%09Thus%20%24%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%24%20is%20an%20order%20relation%3B%0A%20%20%20%202.%20Clearly%20%24(1%2C%204)%24%20and%20%24(3%2C%202)%24%20are%20two%20pairs%20in%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D%20%5Ctimes%20%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D%24.%0A%20%20%20%20%09Since%20%244%20%3E%202%24%2C%20%24(1%2C%204)%20%3E%20(3%2C%202)%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%20%09Since%20%243%20%3E%201%24%2C%20%24(3%2C%202)%20%3E%20(1%2C%204)%24.%0A%20%20%20%20%09I.e.%20neither%20%24((1%2C%204)%2C%20(3%2C%202))%20%5Cnotin%20%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%24%20nor%20%24((3%2C%202)%2C%20(1%2C%204))%20%5Cnotin%20%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%24%20thus%20they%20cannot%20be%20compared.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%201%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%24%5Cequiv%24%20**is%20an%20equivalence%20relation**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20For%20clarity%20let%20us%20denote%20%24%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%20%3D%20%5Cequiv%24%20(mod%20%24m%24)%20%24%3D%20%5Clbrace%20(a%2C%20b)%20%7C%20%5Cexists%20k%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D%20%5Ctext%7Bsuch%20that%7Da%20-%20b%20%3D%20km%20%5Crbrace%24%20a%20relation%20on%20%24A%20%3D%20%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%201.%20%24%5Cforall%20a%20%5Cin%20A%24%2C%20clearly%20%24a%20-%20a%20%3D%200%20%3D%200m%24%20thus%20%24a%20%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%20a%24%2C%20i.e.%20reflexivity%20holds%3B%0A%20%20%20%202.%20If%20%24a%20%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%20b%24%2C%20then%20by%20definition%20%24a%20-%20b%20%3D%20km%24%20for%20some%20%24k%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D%24%2C%20then%20%24b%20-%20a%20%3D%20-km%24%20and%20clearly%20%24-k%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D%24%20thus%20%24b%20%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%20a%24%20and%20symmetry%20holds%3B%0A%20%20%20%203.%20If%20%24a%20%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%20b%24%20and%20%24b%20%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%20c%24%20then%20%24a%20-%20b%20%3D%20km%24%20for%20some%20%24k%24%20and%20%24b%20-%20c%20%3D%20k'%20m%24%20for%20some%20%24k'%24%20thus%20%24a%20-%20c%20%3D%20a%20%2B%20(-%20b%20%2B%20b)%20-%20c%20%3D%20(a%20-%20b)%20%2B%20(b%20-%20c)%20%3D%20km%20%2B%20k'%20m%20%3D%20(k%20%2B%20k')m%24.%20Clearly%20%24k%20%2B%20k'%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D%24%20thus%20%24a%20%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%20c%24%20and%20transitivity%20holds.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Thus%20%24%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%24%20is%20an%20equivalence%20relation.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%202%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Prove%20the%20definition%20is%20equivalent**%3A%0A%0A%20%20%20%201.%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D_m%20%3D%20%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D%2F%20%5Cequiv%20%3D%20%5Clbrace%20%5Chat%7B0%7D%2C%20%5Chat%7B1%7D%2C%20%5Cdots%2C%20%5Chat%7Bm-1%7D%20%5Crbrace%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%202.%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D_m%24%20is%20a%20commutative%20group.%20%24%5Chat%7Ba%7D%20%2B%20%5Chat%7Bb%7D%20%3D%20%5Chat%7Ba%20%2B%20b%7D%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20If%20%24a_1%20%5Cequiv%20a_2%24%20(mod%20%24m%24)%20and%20%24b_1%20%5Cequiv%20b_2%24%20(mod%20%24m%24)%2C%20then%20by%20definition%20%24a_1%20-%20a_2%20%3D%20m%20k_1%2C%20%5Cexists%20k_1%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D%24%20and%20%24b_1%20-%20b_2%20%3D%20m%20k_2%2C%20%5Cexists%20k_2%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D%24.%20Thus%20%24(a_1%20%2B%20b_1)%20-%20(a_2%20%2B%20b_2)%20%3D%20(a_1%20-%20a_2)%20%2B%20(b_1%20-%20b_2)%20%3D%20m%20k_1%20%2B%20m%20k_2%20%3D%20m(k_1%20%2B%20k_2)%20%3D%20mk%2C%20%5Cexists%20k%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D%24%2C%20thus%20%24a_1%20%2B%20b_1%20%5Cequiv%20a_2%20%2B%20b_2%24%20(mod%20%24m%24)%2C%20i.e.%20%24%5Chat%7Ba_1%20%2B%20b_1%7D%20%3D%20%5Chat%7Ba_2%20%2B%20b_2%7D%24%20thus%20the%20definition%20is%20consistent.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%203%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Let%20%24A%20%3D%20%5Cbigcup%5Climits_%7Bi%20%5Cin%20I%7DC_i%24.%20Assume%20%24C_i%20%5Cne%20%5Cvarnothing%2C%20%5Cforall%20i%24%20and%20%24C_i%20%5Ccap%20C_%7Bi'%7D%20%3D%20%5Cvarnothing%2C%20%5Cforall%20i%20%5Cne%20i'%24.%20Define%20%24a%20%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%20b%20%5Ciff%20%5Cexists%20i%20%5Cin%20I%2C%20a%2C%20b%20%5Cin%20C_i%24.%20Show%20%24%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%24%20is%20an%20equivalence%20relation%20on%20%24A%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%201.%20Reflexivity%20is%20trivial%3B%0A%20%20%20%202.%20If%20%24a%20%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%20b%24%2C%20then%20%24%5Cexists%20i%20%5Cin%20I%2C%20a%2C%20b%20%5Cin%20C_i%24%20thus%20%24b%20%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%20a%24%20and%20symmetry%20holds%3B%0A%20%20%20%203.%20If%20%24a%20%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%20b%24%20and%20%24b%20%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%20c%24%20then%20%24%5Cexists%20i%20%5Cin%20I%2C%20a%2C%20b%20%5Cin%20C_i%24%20and%20%24%5Cexists%20j%20%5Cin%20I%2C%20b%2C%20c%20%5Cin%20C_j%24%2C%20thus%20%24b%20%5Cin%20C_i%24%20and%20%24b%20%5Cin%20C_j%24.%20Since%20%24C_i%20%5Ccap%20C_%7Bi'%7D%20%3D%20%5Cvarnothing%2C%20%5Cforall%20i%20%5Cne%20i'%24%2C%20we%20have%20%24i%20%3D%20j%24.%20Thus%20%24a%20%5Cin%20C_i%24%20and%20%24c%20%5Cin%20C_i%24%20thus%20%24a%20%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%20c%24%20and%20transitivity%20holds.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Thus%20%24%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%24%20is%20an%20equivalence%20relation%20on%20%24A%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Suppose%20we%20have%20an%20%24x%24%2C%20then%20%24x%20%5Cin%20A%20%3D%20%5Cbigcup%5Climits_%7Bi%20%5Cin%20I%7DC_i%24%20if%20and%20only%20if%20%24x%20%5Cin%20C_i%24%20for%20some%20%24i%24.%20Since%20%24C_i%20%5Ccap%20C_%7Bi'%7D%20%3D%20%5Cvarnothing%2C%20%5Cforall%20i%20%5Cne%20i'%24%2C%20we%20have%20%24x%20%5Cnotin%20C_j%2C%20%5Cforall%20j%20%5Cne%20i%24.%20If%20%24x'%20%5Cin%20%5Chat%7Bx%7D%20%3D%20%5Clbrace%20x'%20%5Cin%20A%20%7C%20x%20%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%20x'%20%5Crbrace%24%20then%20%24%5Cexists%20j%20%5Cin%20I%2C%20x%2C%20x'%20%5Cin%20C_j%24.%20Since%20%24x%20%5Cnotin%20C_j%2C%20%5Cforall%20j%20%5Cne%20i%24%2C%20%24x%20%5Cin%20C_i%24%20and%20%24x'%20%5Cin%20C_i%24%2C%20thus%20%24%5Chat%7Bx%7D%20%5Csubseteq%20C_i%24.%20If%20%24x'%20%5Cin%20C_i%24%2C%20then%20by%20definition%20%24x%20%5Cmathcal%7BR%7Dx'%24%20thus%20%24x'%20%5Cin%20%5Chat%7Bx%7D%24%20thus%20%24C_i%20%5Csubseteq%20%5Chat%7Bx%7D%24.%20Thus%20%24%5Chat%7Bx%7D%20%3D%20C_i%24.%20Thus%20%24A%2F%20%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%20%3D%24%20class%20of%20all%20(distinct)%20equivalence%20classes%20%24%3D%20%5Clbrace%20C_i%20%7C%20i%20%5Cin%20I%20%5Crbrace%24.%0A%20%20%20%20%22%22%22)%0A%20%20%20%20return%0A%0A%0A%40app.cell%0Adef%20_(mo)%3A%0A%20%20%20%20mo.md(r%22%22%22%0A%20%20%20%20%23%20Fall%20Semester%20Homework%202%0A%20%20%20%20%22%22%22)%0A%20%20%20%20return%0A%0A%0A%40app.cell%0Adef%20_(mo)%3A%0A%20%20%20%20mo.md(r%22%22%22%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%201%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Define%20the%20relation%20%24%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%24%20on%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BN%7D%24%20as%20%24(m%2C%20n)%20%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%20(m'%2C%20n')%20%5Ciff%20m%20%2B%20n'%20%3D%20n%20%2B%20m'%24.%20Prove%20%24%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%24%20is%20an%20equivalence%20relation**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%201.%20Clearly%20%24m%20%2B%20n%20%3D%20n%20%2B%20m%24%20thus%20%24(m%2C%20n)%20%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%20(m%2C%20n)%24%2C%20reflexive%20holds%3B%0A%20%20%20%202.%20If%20%24(m%2C%20n)%20%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%20(m'%2C%20n')%24%2C%20then%20%24m%20%2B%20n'%20%3D%20n%20%2B%20m'%24%20thus%20%24m'%20%2B%20n%20%3D%20n'%20%2B%20m%24%20(by%20changing%20order%20and%20side)%20thus%20%24(m'%2C%20n')%20%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%20(m%2C%20n)%24%2C%20symmetric%20holds%3B%0A%20%20%20%203.%20If%20%24(m%2C%20n)%20%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%20(m'%2C%20n')%24%20and%20%24(m'%2C%20n')%20%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%20(m''%2C%20n'')%24%2C%20then%20%24m%20%2B%20n'%20%3D%20n%20%2B%20m'%24%2C%20%24m'%20%2B%20n''%20%3D%20n'%20%2B%20m''%24%2C%20thus%20%24m%20%2B%20n'%20%2B%20m'%20%2B%20n''%20%3D%20n%20%2B%20m'%20%2B%20n'%20%2B%20m''%24%2C%20thus%20%24n'%20%2B%20m'%20%2B%20m%20%2B%20n''%20%3D%20n'%20%2B%20m'%20%2B%20n%20%2B%20m''%24.%20By%20adding%20inverse%20of%20%24n'%24%20and%20%24m'%24%20with%20respect%20to%20addition%20in%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%24%20to%20the%20left%20of%20both%20side%2C%20we%20have%20%24m%20%2B%20n''%20%3D%20n%20%2B%20m''%24%20thus%20%24(m%2C%20n)%20%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%20(m''%2C%20n'')%24%2C%20transitivity%20holds.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Thus%20this%20is%20an%20equivalence%20relation.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%202%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Define%20%24%5Chat%7B(m%2C%20n)%7D%24%20the%20equivalence%20class%20of%20'-'.%20Define%20the%20sum%20of%20two%20classes%20by%20%24%5Chat%7B(m%2C%20n)%7D%20%2B%20%5Chat%7B(m'%2C%20n')%7D%20%3D%20%5Chat%7B(m%20%2B%20m'%2C%20n%20%2B%20n')%7D%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%201.%20**Show%20that%20%24%5Chat%7B(m%2C%20n)%7D%20%3D%20%5Chat%7B(m%2Bk%2C%20n%2Bk)%7D%24**.%0A%20%20%20%202.%20**Show%20that%20%24%5Chat%7B(k%2C%20k)%7D%24%20is%20the%20neutral%20element%20with%20respect%20to%20addition**.%0A%20%20%20%203.%20**Show%20that%20%24%5Chat%7B(m%2C%20n)%7D%20%2B%20%5Chat%7B(n%2C%20m)%7D%20%3D%20%5Chat%7B(k%2C%20k)%7D%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%201.%20Clearly%20we%20have%20%24m%20%2B%20(n%2Bk)%20%3D%20n%20%2B%20(m%2Bk)%24%2C%20thus%20by%20above%20definition%20%24(m%2C%20n)%20%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%20(m%2Bk%2C%20n%2Bk)%24%2C%20thus%20their%20equivalence%20classes%20coincidence%3B%0A%20%20%20%202.%20For%20any%20pair%20%24(m%2C%20k)%24%2C%20by%20the%20above%20summation%20definition%2C%20%24%5Chat%7B(m%2C%20n)%7D%20%2B%20%5Chat%7B(k%2C%20k)%7D%20%3D%20%5Chat%7B(m%2Bk%2C%20n%2Bk)%7D%20%3D%5E%7B%5Ctext%7Bby%20(i).%7D%7D%20%5Chat%7B(m%2C%20n)%7D%24%20and%20%24%5Chat%7B(k%2C%20k)%7D%20%2B%20%5Chat%7B(m%2C%20n)%7D%20%3D%20%5Chat%7B(k%2Bm%2C%20k%2Bn)%7D%20%3D%20%5Chat%7B(m%2Bk%2C%20n%2Bk)%7D%20%3D%5E%7B%5Ctext%7Bby%20(i).%7D%7D%20%5Chat%7B(m%2C%20n)%7D%24.%0A%20%20%20%20%09I.e.%20%24%5Chat%7B(k%2C%20k)%7D%24%20is%20the%20(two-sided)%20identity%20element%3B%0A%20%20%20%203.%20By%20the%20above%20summation%20definition%2C%20%24%5Chat%7B(m%2C%20n)%7D%20%2B%20%5Chat%7B(n%2C%20m)%7D%20%3D%20%5Chat%7B(m%2Bn%2C%20n%2Bm)%7D%24.%0A%20%20%20%20%09Clearly%20we%20have%20%24(m%2Bn)%20%2B%20k%20%3D%20(n%2Bm)%20%2B%20k%24%20thus%20%24(m%2Bn%2C%20n%2Bm)%20%5Cmathcal%7BR%7D%20(k%2C%20k)%24%20thus%20their%20equivalence%20classes%20coincidence.%0A%20%20%20%20%09Thus%20%24%5Chat%7B(m%2C%20n)%7D%20%2B%20%5Chat%7B(n%2C%20m)%7D%20%3D%20%5Chat%7B(m%2Bn%2C%20n%2Bm)%7D%20%3D%20%5Chat%7B(k%2C%20k)%7D%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%20Section%201.1%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%204%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**What%20is%20the%20intersection%20of%20all%20the%20open%20intervals%20containing%20the%20closed%20interval%20%24%5B0%2C%201%5D%24%3F%20Justify%20your%20answer**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Claim%20that%20the%20answer%20is%20%24%5B0%2C%201%5D%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20By%20construction%20the%20intersection%20is%20%24S%20%3D%20%5Cbigcap%5Climits_%7BA%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathcal%7BA%7D%7D%20A%2C%20%5B0%2C%201%5D%20%5Csubseteq%20A%24%2C%20%24A%24%20open.%20If%20%24a%20%5Cin%20%5B0%2C%201%5D%24%2C%20then%20%24a%20%5Cin%20%5B0%2C%201%5D%20%5Csubseteq%20A%24%2C%20for%20all%20%24A%24%2C%20thus%20%24a%20%5Cin%20%5Cbigcap%5Climits_%7BA%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathcal%7BA%7D%7D%20A%20%3D%20S%24.%20If%20%24a%20%3C%200%24%2C%20then%20the%20open%20interval%20%24(a%2C%202)%24%20contains%20%24%5B0%2C%201%5D%24%20but%20not%20%24a%24%2C%20which%20is%20a%20contradiction.%20Similarly%20if%20%24a%20%3E%201%24%20there%20is%20a%20contradiction.%20Thus%20%24S%20%3D%20%5B0%2C%201%5D%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%205%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**What%20is%20the%20intersection%20of%20all%20the%20close%20intervals%20containing%20the%20open%20interval%20%24(0%2C%201)%24%3F%20Justify%20your%20answer**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Claim%20that%20the%20answer%20is%20%24%5B0%2C%201%5D%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20By%20construction%20the%20intersection%20is%20%24S%20%3D%20%5Cbigcap%5Climits_%7BA%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathcal%7BA%7D%7D%20A%2C%20(0%2C%201)%20%5Csubseteq%20A%24%2C%20%24A%24%20closed.%20If%20%24a%20%5Cin%20(0%2C%201)%24%2C%20then%20%24a%20%5Cin%20(0%2C%201)%20%5Csubseteq%20A%24%20for%20all%20%24A%24%20thus%20%24a%20%5Cin%20S%24.%20If%20%24a%20%3D%200%24%2C%20suppose%20there%20exists%20%24A%24%20such%20that%20%24(0%2C%201)%20%5Csubseteq%20A%24%2C%20%24A%24%20closed%2C%20and%20%240%20%5Cnotin%20A%24.%20Since%20%24A%24%20closed%2C%20it%20is%20of%20the%20form%20%24%5Ba_l%2C%20a_u%5D%24%20with%20%240%20%3C%20a_l%24.%20Take%20%24a'%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7Ba_l%7D%7B2%7D%24%2C%20then%20%240%20%3C%20a'%20%3C%20a_l%24.%20Thus%20%24a'%20%5Cin%20(0%2C%201)%24%20but%20%24a'%20%5Cnotin%20A%24%2C%20which%20is%20a%20contradiction%2C%20thus%20such%20%24A%24%20does%20not%20exist%2C%20thus%20%24a%20%3D%200%20%5Cin%20S%24.%20Similar%20with%20%24a%20%3D%201%24.%20If%20%24a%20%3C%200%24%20or%20%24a%20%3E%201%24%2C%20take%20%24A'%20%3D%20%5B0%2C%201%5D%24%2C%20then%20%24A'%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathcal%7BA%7D%24%20but%20%24a%20%5Cnotin%20A'%24%20thus%20%24a%20%5Cnotin%20S%24.%20Thus%20%24S%20%3D%20%5B0%2C%201%5D%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%206%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**What%20is%20the%20union%20of%20all%20of%20the%20closed%20intervals%20contained%20in%20the%20open%20interval%20%24(0%2C%201)%24%3F%20Justify%20your%20answer**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Claim%20that%20the%20answer%20is%20%24(0%2C%201)%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20By%20construction%20the%20union%20is%20%24U%20%3D%20%5Cbigcup%5Climits_%7BA%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathcal%7BA%7D%7DA%2C%20A%20%5Csubseteq%20(0%2C%201)%2C%20A%24%20closed.%20If%20%24a%20%5Cle%200%24%2C%20%24a%20%5Cnotin%20(0%2C%201)%24%2C%20thus%20%24a%24%20is%20not%20in%20any%20subset%20of%20%24(0%2C%201)%24%2C%20i.e.%20%24a%20%5Cnotin%20A%2C%20%5Cforall%20A%24%2C%20thus%20%24a%20%5Cle%200%24%20is%20not%20in%20the%20union.%20Similar%20with%20%24a%20%5Cge%201%24.%20Otherwise%20%240%20%3C%20a%20%3C%201%24%2C%20take%20%24a'%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7Ba%7D%7B2%7D%24%20and%20%24b'%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7Ba%20%2B%201%7D%7B2%7D%24%20(mid-point%20of%20%24a%24%20and%20%241%24)%2C%20then%20the%20closed%20interval%20%24A'%20%3D%20%5Ba'%2C%20b'%5D%20%5Cni%20a%24%20is%20contained%20in%20%24(0%2C%201)%24%20thus%20%24A'%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathcal%7BA%7D%24%2C%20i.e.%20such%20%24a%24%20is%20in%20the%20union.%20Thus%20the%20union%20is%20%24(0%2C%201)%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%208%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Which%20of%20the%20following%20functions%20%24f%3A%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%20%5Crightarrow%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%24%20are%20one%20to%20one%20and%20which%20ones%20are%20onto.%20Justify%20your%20answer**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%201.%20%24f(x)%20%3D%20x%5E2%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%202.%20%24f(x)%20%3D%20x%5E3%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%203.%20%24f(x)%20%3D%20e%5Ex%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%201.%20%241%20%3D%20f(1)%20%3D%20f(-1)%24%20thus%20%24f%24%20not%20one-to-one.%20%24x%5E2%20%3D%20-1%24%20has%20no%20solution%20in%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%24%20thus%20%24f%24%20not%20onto%3B%0A%20%20%20%202.%20Let%20%24g%3A%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%20%5Crightarrow%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%24%20given%20by%20%24g(x)%20%3D%20x%5E%7B1%2F3%7D%24.%20Cube%20root%20is%20a%20function.%20%24%5Cforall%20x%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%2C%20f(g(x))%20%3D%20f(x%5E%7B1%2F3%7D)%20%3D%20(x%5E%7B1%2F3%7D)%5E3%20%3D%20x%5E1%20%3D%20x%24%2C%20and%20%24g(f(x))%20%3D%20g(x%5E3)%20%3D%20(x%5E3)%5E%7B1%2F3%7D%20%3D%20x%24.%20Thus%20%24f%24%20is%20a%20bijection%20thus%20both%20one-to-one%20and%20onto%3B%0A%20%20%20%203.%20Observe%20that%20%24f%24%20is%20a%20strict%20increasing%20function%2C%20thus%20no%20%24x%20%3C%20y%24%20would%20have%20image%20%24f(x)%20%3D%20f(y)%24%2C%20thus%20%24f%24%20is%20one-to-one.%20%24f%24%20not%20onto%20because%20%24e%5Ex%24%20is%20never%20negative%20for%20%24x%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%2011%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Prove%20that%2C%20if%20%24f%3A%20A%20%5Crightarrow%20B%24%20is%20a%20function%20and%20%24E%24%20and%20%24F%24%20are%20subsets%20of%20%24A%24%2C%20then%20%24f(E%20%5Ccup%20F)%20%3D%20f(E)%20%5Ccup%20f(F)%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%24f(E%20%5Ccup%20F)%20%3D%20%5Clbrace%20b%20%7C%20b%20%3D%20f(a)%24%20for%20at%20least%20one%20%24a%20%5Cin%20E%20%5Ccup%20F%20%5Crbrace%20%3D%20%5Clbrace%20b%20%7C%20b%20%3D%20f(a)%24%20for%20at%20least%20one%20%24a%20%5Cin%20E%24%20or%20%24a%20%5Cin%20F%20%5Crbrace%20%3D%20%5Clbrace%20b%20%7C%20b%20%3D%20f(a)%24%20for%20at%20least%20one%20%24a%20%5Cin%20E%20%5Crbrace%20%5Ccup%20%5Clbrace%20b%20%7C%20b%20%3D%20f(a)%24%20for%20at%20least%20one%20%24a%20%5Cin%20F%20%5Crbrace%20%3D%20f(E)%20%5Ccup%20f(F)%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%2012%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Prove%20that%2C%20if%20%24f%3A%20A%20%5Crightarrow%20B%24%20is%20a%20function%20and%20%24E%24%20and%20%24F%24%20are%20subsets%20of%20%24A%24%2C%20then%20%24f(E%20%5Ccap%20F)%20%5Csubseteq%20f(E)%20%5Ccap%20f(F)%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%24f(E%20%5Ccap%20F)%20%3D%20%5Clbrace%20b%20%7C%20b%20%3D%20f(a)%24%20for%20at%20least%20one%20%24a%20%5Cin%20E%20%5Ccap%20F%20%5Crbrace%20%3D%20%5Clbrace%20b%20%7C%20b%20%3D%20f(a)%24%20for%20at%20least%20one%20%24a%20%5Cin%20E%24%20and%20%24a%20%5Cin%20F%20%5Crbrace%20%3D%20%5Clbrace%20b%20%7C%20b%20%3D%20f(a_0)%24%20for%20at%20least%20one%20%24a_0%20%5Cin%20E%20%5Crbrace%20%5Ccap%20%5Clbrace%20b%20%7C%20b%20%3D%20f(a_0)%24%20for%20at%20least%20the%20same%20%24a_0%20%5Cin%20F%20%5Crbrace%20%5Csubseteq%20%5Clbrace%20b%20%7C%20b%20%3D%20f(a_0)%24%20for%20at%20least%20one%20%24a_0%20%5Cin%20E%20%5Crbrace%20%5Ccap%20%5Clbrace%20b%20%7C%20b%20%3D%20f(a_1)%24%20for%20at%20least%20one%20%24a_1%20%5Cin%20F%20%5Crbrace%20%3D%20f(E)%20%5Ccap%20f(F)%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%2013%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Give%20an%20example%20of%20a%20function%20%24f%3A%20A%20%5Crightarrow%20B%24%20and%20subsets%20%24F%20%5Csubseteq%20E%24%20of%20%24A%24%20for%20which%20%24f(E)%20%5Cbackslash%20f(F)%20%5Cne%20f(E%20%5Cbackslash%20F)%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Let%20%24A%20%3D%20B%20%3D%20%5Clbrace%201%2C%202%2C%203%20%5Crbrace%24%2C%20%24f%24%20given%20by%20%24f(1)%20%3D%201%2C%20f(2)%20%3D%201%2C%20f(3)%20%3D%202%24%2C%20%24F%20%3D%20%5Clbrace%202%2C%203%20%5Crbrace%24%2C%20and%20finally%20%24E%20%3D%20%5Clbrace%201%2C%202%2C%203%20%5Crbrace%24.%20Then%20%24f(E)%20%3D%20%5Clbrace%201%2C%202%20%5Crbrace%24%2C%20%24f(F)%20%3D%20%5Clbrace%201%2C%202%20%5Crbrace%24%2C%20and%20we%20have%20%24f(E)%20%5Cbackslash%20f(F)%20%3D%20%5Cvarnothing%24%20but%20%24f(E%20%5Cbackslash%20F)%20%3D%20f(%5Clbrace%201%20%5Crbrace)%20%3D%20%5Clbrace%201%20%5Crbrace%24%2C%20which%20are%20not%20equal.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%2014%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Prove%20that%20equality%20holds%20in%20Parts%20(b)%20and%20(c)%20of%20Theorem%201.1.7%20if%20the%20function%20%24f%24%20is%20one-to-one**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20(b)%3A%20Following%20exercise%2012%2C%20if%20%24f%24%20is%20injective%2C%20then%20%24b%20%3D%20f(a_0)%20%3D%20f(a_1)%20%5Cimplies%20a_0%20%3D%20a_1%24%2C%20we%20can%20thus%20substitute%20all%20%24a_0%2C%20a_1%24%20by%20%24a%24%20and%20equality%20holds.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20(c)%3A%20%24f(E)%20-%20f(F)%20%3D%20%5Clbrace%20b%20%7C%20b%20%3D%20f(a_0)%24%20for%20at%20least%20one%20%24a_0%20%5Cin%20E%20%5Crbrace%20-%20%5Clbrace%20b%20%7C%20b%20%3D%20f(a_1)%24%20for%20at%20least%20one%20%24a_1%20%5Cin%20F%20%5Crbrace%20%3D%20%5Clbrace%20b%20%7C%20b%20%3D%20f(a_0)%24%20for%20at%20least%20one%20%24a_0%20%5Cin%20E%24%20and%20%24b%20%5Cne%20f(a_1)%24%20for%20all%20%24a_1%20%5Cin%20F%20%5Crbrace%20%3D%20%5Clbrace%20b%20%7C%20b%20%3D%20f(a)%24%20for%20at%20least%20one%20%24a%20%5Cin%20E%20-%20F%20%5Crbrace%20-%20%5Clbrace%20b%20%7C%20b%20%3D%20f(a)%24%20for%20at%20least%20one%20%24a%20%5Cin%20E%20-%20F%24%20and%20for%20at%20least%20one%20%24a%20%5Cin%20F%20%5Crbrace%20%5Csubseteq%20%5Clbrace%20b%20%7C%20b%20%3D%20f(a)%24%20for%20at%20least%20one%20%24a%20%5Cin%20E%20-%20F%20%5Crbrace%20%3D%20f(E%20-%20F)%24.%20If%20%24f%24%20is%20injective%2C%20then%20%24f(a')%20%3D%20f(a)%20%5Cimplies%20a'%20%3D%20a%24%2C%20thus%20%24a%20%5Cin%20E%20-%20F%20%5Cimplies%20a%20%5Cnotin%20F%24%20thus%20%24%5Clbrace%20b%20%7C%20b%20%3D%20f(a)%24%20for%20at%20least%20one%20%24a%20%5Cin%20E%20-%20F%24%20and%20for%20at%20least%20one%20%24a%20%5Cin%20F%20%5Crbrace%20%3D%20%5Cvarnothing%24%2C%20thus%20equality%20holds.%0A%20%20%20%20%22%22%22)%0A%20%20%20%20return%0A%0A%0A%40app.cell%0Adef%20_(mo)%3A%0A%20%20%20%20mo.md(r%22%22%22%0A%20%20%20%20%23%20Fall%20Semester%20Homework%203%0A%20%20%20%20%22%22%22)%0A%20%20%20%20return%0A%0A%0A%40app.cell%0Adef%20_(mo)%3A%0A%20%20%20%20mo.md(r%22%22%22%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%20Section%201.2%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%2011%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Using%20induction%2C%20prove%20that%20%24%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bk%20%3D%201%7D%5En%20(2k-1)%20%3D%20n%5E2%24%20for%20every%20%24n%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BN%7D%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20If%20%24n%20%3D%201%24%2C%20%242%20%5Ccdot%201%20-%201%20%3D%201%5E2%24%2C%20true.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Now%20suppose%20%24%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bk%20%3D%201%7D%5Em%20(2k-1)%20%3D%20m%5E2%24%2C%20then%20%24%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bk%20%3D%201%7D%5E%7Bm%20%2B%201%7D%20(2k-1)%24%20%24%3D%20%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bk%20%3D%201%7D%5E%7Bm%7D%20(2k-1)%20%2B%202(m%20%2B%201)%20-%201%24%20%24%3D%20m%5E2%20%2B%202(m%2B1)%20-%201%24%20%24%3D%20m%5E2%20%2B%202m%20%2B%201%20%3D%20(m%2B1)%5E2%24%2C%20i.e.%20statement%20true%20for%20%24m%2B1%24%20given%20%24m%24%20true.%20By%20induction%20the%20statement%20true%20for%20all%20natural%20%24n%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%2014%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Let%20a%20sequence%20%24%5Clbrace%20x_n%20%5Crbrace%24%20of%20numbers%20be%20defined%20recursively%20by%20%24x_1%20%3D%200%24%20and%20%24x_%7Bn%2B1%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7Bx_n%2B1%7D%7B2%7D%24.%20Prove%20by%20induction%20that%20%24x_n%20%5Cle%20x_%7Bn%2B1%7D%24%20for%20all%20%24n%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BN%7D%24.%20Would%20this%20conclusion%20change%20if%20we%20set%20%24x_1%20%3D%202%24**%3F%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%240%20%3D%20x_1%20%5Cle%20x_2%20%3D%201%2F2%24%20true.%20Now%20suppose%20%24x_m%20%5Cle%20x_%7Bm%2B1%7D%24%2C%20then%20%24x_%7Bm%2B2%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7Bx_%7Bm%2B1%7D%2B1%7D%7B2%7D%20%5Cge%20%5Cfrac%7Bx_%7Bm%7D%2B1%7D%7B2%7D%20%3D%20x_%7Bm%2B1%7D%24%2C%20i.e.%20statement%20true%20for%20%24m%2B1%24%20given%20%24m%24%20true.%20By%20induction%20the%20statement%20true%20for%20all%20natural%20%24n%24.%20Now%20%242%20%3D%20x_1%20%5Cle%20x_2%20%3D%201.5%24%20not%20true.%20Thus%20the%20conclusion%20does%20not%20hold.%20Notice%20that%20however%20the%20conclusion%20holds%20with%20%24%5Cge%24%20with%20the%20similar%20logic.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%2016%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Use%20induction%20in%20the%20form%20stated%20in%20the%20preceding%20exercise%20to%20prove%20that%20%24n%5E2%20%3C%202%5En%24%20for%20all%20%24n%20%5Cge%205%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%2425%20%3D%205%5E2%20%3C%202%5E5%20%3D%2032%24%20true.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Now%20suppose%20%24m%5E2%20%3C%202%5Em%24%2C%20then%20%24(m%2B1)%5E2%20%3D%20m%5E2%20%2B%202m%20%2B%201%20%3C%202%5Em%20%2B%202m%20%2B%201%24%20(here%20by%20induction%20%242n%20%2B%201%20%3C%202%5En%24%20for%20all%20%24n%20%5Cge%205%24%20as%3A%20%242%20%5Ccdot%205%20%2B%201%20%3D%2011%20%3C%2032%24%20true%2C%20if%20%242m%20%2B%201%20%3C%202%5Em%24%20true%20then%20%242(m%2B1)%20%2B%201%20%3D%202m%2B1%20%2B%202%20%3C%202%5Em%20%2B%202%5E1%20%3C%202%5Em%20%2B%202%5Em%20%3D%202%5E%7Bm%2B1%7D%24%20thus%20statement%20holds%20for%20all%20%24n%20%5Cge%205%24)%20%24%3C%202%5Em%20%2B%202%5Em%20%3D%202%5E%7Bm%20%2B%201%7D%24%2C%20i.e.%20statement%20true%20for%20%24m%2B1%24%20given%20%24m%24%20true.%20By%20induction%20the%20statement%20true%20for%20all%20%24n%20%5Cge%205%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%2017%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Prove%20the%20identity%20%24%5Cbegin%7Bpmatrix%7D%20n%20%5C%5C%20k-1%20%5Cend%7Bpmatrix%7D%20%2B%20%5Cbegin%7Bpmatrix%7D%20n%20%5C%5C%20k%20%5Cend%7Bpmatrix%7D%20%3D%20%5Cbegin%7Bpmatrix%7D%20n%20%2B%201%20%5C%5C%20k%20%5Cend%7Bpmatrix%7D%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%24%5Cbegin%7Bpmatrix%7D%20n%20%2B%201%20%5C%5C%20k%20%5Cend%7Bpmatrix%7D%20%5Coverset%7B%5Ctext%7Bdef%7D%7D%7B%3D%7D%20%5Cfrac%7B(n%20%2B%201)!%7D%7Bk!(n%20%2B%201%20-%20k)!%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B(n)!(n%20%2B%201)%7D%7Bk!(n%20%2B%201%20-%20k)!%7D%24%20%24%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B(n)!(n%20%2B%201%20%2B%20k%20-%20k)%7D%7Bk!(n%20%2B%201%20-%20k)!%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B(n)!(n%20%2B%201%20-%20k)%20%2B%20(n!)k%7D%7Bk!(n%20%2B%201%20-%20k)!%7D%24%20%24%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B(n)!(n%20%2B%201%20-%20k)%7D%7Bk!(n%20%2B%201%20-%20k)!%7D%20%2B%20%5Cfrac%7B(n)!k%7D%7Bk!(n%20%2B%201%20-%20k)!%7D%24%20%24%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B(n)!(n%20%2B%201%20-%20k)%7D%7Bk!(n%20-%20k)!(n%20%2B%201%20-%20k)%7D%20%2B%20%5Cfrac%7B(n)!k%7D%7B(k%20-%201)!(n%20-%20k%20%2B%201)!k%7D%24%20%24%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B(n)!%7D%7Bk!(n%20-%20k)!%7D%20%2B%20%5Cfrac%7B(n)!%7D%7B(k%20-%201)!(n%20-%20k%20%2B%201)!%7D%24%20%24%5Coverset%7B%5Ctext%7Bdef%7D%7D%7B%3D%7D%20%5Cbegin%7Bpmatrix%7D%20n%20%5C%5C%20k%20%5Cend%7Bpmatrix%7D%20%2B%20%5Cbegin%7Bpmatrix%7D%20n%20%5C%5C%20k-1%20%5Cend%7Bpmatrix%7D%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%2019%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Prove%20the%20well%20ordering%20principle%20for%20the%20natural%20numbers%3A%20each%20non-empty%20subset%20%24S%24%20of%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BN%7D%24%20contains%20a%20smallest%20element**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Let%20%24S%24%20be%20a%20non-empty%20subset%20of%20the%20natural.%20Assume%20there%20is%20no%20least%20element%20in%20%24S%24.%20Since%20%241%24%20is%20the%20least%20natural%20number%2C%20%241%20%5Cnotin%20S%24%2C%20thus%20%241%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BN%7D%20-%20S%24.%20Suppose%20now%20%241%2C%202%2C%20%5Cdots%2C%20m%20%5Cnotin%20S%24%2C%20then%20%24m%20%2B%201%24%20is%20smaller%20than%20anything%20else%20in%20the%20naturals%2C%20thus%20%24m%20%2B%201%24%20not%20in%20%24S%24%2C%20%24m%20%2B%201%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BN%7D%20-%20S%24.%20By%20strong%20induction%2C%20%24n%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BN%7D%20-%20S%2C%20%5Cforall%20n%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BN%7D%24%2C%20in%20other%20words%2C%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BN%7D%20%3D%20%5Cmathbb%7BN%7D%20-%20S%24%2C%20thus%20%24S%20%3D%20%5Cvarnothing%24%2C%20which%20is%20a%20contradiction.%20Thus%20there%20is%20a%20least%20element%20in%20%24S%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%20Section%201.3%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%208%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Assuming%20%24x%2C%20y%2C%20z%24%20are%20elements%20of%20a%20field.%20%24x%20y%3D0%24%20implies%20%24x%20%3D%200%24%20or%20%24y%20%3D%200%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%24x%20y%20%3D%200%24%2C%20if%20%24x%20%3D%200%24%20or%20%24y%20%3D%200%24%20or%20both%20then%20we%20are%20done.%20If%20%24x%20%5Cne%200%24%2C%20then%20by%20definition%20%24%5Cexists%20x%5E%7B-1%7D%24%20such%20that%20%24x%5E%7B-1%7Dx%20y%20%3D%20x%5E%7B-1%7D0%20%5Cimplies%201%20y%20%3D%200%20%5Cimplies%20y%20%3D%200%24.%20Similarly%20if%20%24y%20%5Cne%200%24%20then%20%24x%20%3D%200%24.%20Thus%20%24x%20%3D%200%24%20or%20%24y%20%3D%200%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%2011%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Assuming%20%24x%2C%20y%2C%20z%24%20are%20elements%20of%20an%20ordered%20field.%20%240%20%3C%20x%20%3C%20y%24%20implies%20%24y%5E%7B-1%7D%20%3C%20x%5E%7B-1%7D%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20First%20we%20need%20show%20that%20%24x%20%3E%200%20%5Cimplies%20x%5E%7B-1%7D%20%3E%200%24%3A%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Suppose%20not%2C%20then%20%24-x%5E%7B-1%7D%20%3E%200%24%2C%20then%20%24x%20(-x%5E%7B-1%7D)%20%3E%200%24%2C%20well%20the%20left%20side%20%24%3D%20-1%20(x%5E%7B-1%7D%20x)%20%3D%20-1%20%5Ccdot%201%20%3D%20-1%24%20thus%20%24-1%20%3E%200%24%20which%20is%20a%20contradiction%20thus%20%24x%5E%7B-1%7D%20%3E%200%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Thus%20%240%20%3C%20x%20%3C%20y%20%5Cimplies%200%20x%5E%7B-1%7D%20%3C%20x%20x%5E%7B-1%7D%20%3C%20y%20x%5E%7B-1%7D%20%5Cimplies%20y%5E%7B-1%7D%200%20x%5E%7B-1%7D%20%3C%20y%5E%7B-1%7D%20x%20x%5E%7B-1%7D%20%3C%20y%5E%7B-1%7D%20y%20x%5E%7B-1%7D%20%5Cimplies%200%20%3C%20y%5E%7B-1%7D%20%3C%20x%5E%7B-1%7D%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%2012%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Prove%20that%20the%20equation%20%24x%5E2%3D%205%24%20has%20no%20rational%20solution**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20By%20Theorem%201.3.9%20the%20solution%20is%20an%20integer.%20Clearly%20%240%5E2%20%3D%200%20%5Cne%205%2C%201%5E2%20%3D%20-1%5E2%20%3D%201%20%5Cne%205%2C%202%5E2%20%3D%20-2%5E2%20%3D%204%20%5Cne%205%2C%203%5E2%20%3D%20-3%5E2%20%3D%209%20%3E%205%24%2C%20and%20for%20%24n%24%20with%20%24%7C%20n%20%7C%20%3E%203%24%2C%20%24n%5E2%20%3E%203%5E2%20%3E%205%24.%20At%20this%20point%20we%20have%20checked%20all%20possible%20solutions%20and%20they%20all%20fail%2C%20thus%20there%20is%20no%20solution%20in%20the%20rational%20field.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%2013%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Generalize%20Theorem%201.3.9%20by%20proving%20that%20every%20rational%20solution%20of%20a%20polynomial%20equation%20%24x%5En%2B%20a_%7Bn-1%7Dx%5E%7Bn-1%7D%20%2B%20%5Cdots%20%2B%20a_1x%20%2B%20a_0%3D%200%24%2C%20with%20integer%20coefficients%20%24a_k%24%2C%20is%20an%20integer%20solution**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Let%20%24r%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7Bx%7D%7By%7D%24%20is%20a%20rational%20solution%20with%20%24x%2C%20y%24%20no%20common%20divisor.%20Also%20take%20%24a_0'%20%3D%20-%20a_0%24.%20We%20can%20rewrite%20the%20equation%20as%20%24%5Cfrac%7Bx%7D%7By%7D%5En%2B%20a_%7Bn-1%7D%20%5Cfrac%7Bx%7D%7By%7D%5E%7Bn-1%7D%20%2B%20%5Cdots%20%2B%20a_1%20%5Cfrac%7Bx%7D%7By%7D%20%3D%20a_0'%24%2C%20thus%20we%20have%2C%20multiply%20%24y%5En%24%20both%20sides%2C%20%24x%5En%20%2B%20a_%7Bn-1%7Dx%5E%7Bn-1%7Dy%20%2B%20%5Cdots%20%2B%20a_1%20x%20y%5E%7Bn-1%7D%20%3D%20a_0'%20y%5En%24%20which%20implies%20%24y%24%20divides%20%24x%5En%20%2B%20a_%7Bn-1%7Dx%5E%7Bn-1%7Dy%20%2B%20%5Cdots%20%2B%20a_1%20x%20y%5E%7Bn-1%7D%20%3D%20x%5En%20%2B%20y(a_%7Bn-1%7Dx%5E%7Bn-1%7D%20%2B%20%5Cdots%20%2B%20a_1%20x%20y%5E%7Bn-2%7D)%20%5Cequiv%20x%5En%24%20mod%20%24y%24%20thus%20%24y%24%20divides%20%24x%5En%24.%20Then%20similar%20with%20the%20proof%20of%20theorem%201.3.9%2C%20this%20could%20only%20happen%2C%20under%20the%20assumption%20that%20%24x%2C%20y%24%20has%20no%20common%20divisor%2C%20if%20%24y%20%3D%201%24%2C%20i.e.%20%24r%20%3D%20x%24%20is%20an%20integer.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%2015%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Use%20the%20result%20of%20the%20preceding%20exercise%20to%20prove%20that%20if%20a%20prime%20%24p%24%20divides%20the%20product%20%24n%20m%24%20of%20two%20positive%20integers%2C%20then%20it%20divides%20%24n%24%20or%20it%20divides%20%24m%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Suppose%20a%20prime%20%24p%24%20divides%20the%20product%20%24n%20m%24%20of%20two%20positive%20integers.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20If%20%24p%24%20does%20not%20divide%20%24n%24%2C%20since%20%24p%24%20prime%2C%20%24p%2C%20n%24%20are%20relatively%20prime.%20By%20previous%20exercise%2C%20%24%5Cexists%20a%2C%20b%24%20such%20that%20%24a%20p%20%2B%20b%20n%20%3D%201%24%2C%20thus%20%24a%20p%20m%20%2B%20b%20n%20m%20%3D%20m%24%2C%20by%20construction%20we%20have%20that%20there%20exists%20a%20%24k%24%20such%20that%20%24k%20p%20%3D%20n%20m%24%2C%20thus%20%24a%20p%20m%20%2B%20b%20k%20p%20%3D%20m%20%5Cimplies%20p(a%20m%20%2B%20b%20k)%20%3D%20m%24%2C%20which%20implies%20that%20%24p%24%20divides%20%24m%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20With%20the%20same%20argument%2C%20if%20%24p%24%20does%20not%20divide%20%24m%24%2C%20it%20divides%20%24n%24.%20Thus%20we%20conclude%20%24p%24%20divides%20%24n%24%20or%20it%20divides%20%24m%24.%0A%20%20%20%20%22%22%22)%0A%20%20%20%20return%0A%0A%0A%40app.cell%0Adef%20_(mo)%3A%0A%20%20%20%20mo.md(r%22%22%22%0A%20%20%20%20%23%20Fall%20Semester%20Homework%204%0A%20%20%20%20%22%22%22)%0A%20%20%20%20return%0A%0A%0A%40app.cell%0Adef%20_(mo)%3A%0A%20%20%20%20mo.md(r%22%22%22%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%20Section%201.4%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%201%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**For%20each%20of%20the%20following%20sets%2C%20describe%20the%20set%20of%20all%20upper%20bounds%20for%20the%20set**%3A%0A%0A%20%20%20%201.%20**the%20set%20of%20odd%20integers**%3B%0A%20%20%20%202.%20%24%5Clbrace%201%20-%201%2Fn%3A%20n%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BN%7D%20%5Crbrace%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%203.%20%24%5Clbrace%20r%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BQ%7D%20%3A%20r%5E3%20%3C%208%20%5Crbrace%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%204.%20%24%5Clbrace%20%5Csin(x)%3A%20x%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%20%5Crbrace%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%201.%20This%20set%20is%20not%20bounded%20as%20for%20any%20%24n%20%3D%202k%2B1%2C%20k%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BN%7D%24%20be%20an%20integer%2C%20%24n%2B2%24%20is%20an%20odd%20integer%20greater%20than%20%24n%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%202.%20Since%20%24n%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BN%7D%24%2C%20%24n%20%3E%200%24%2C%20and%20by%20previous%20homework%20we%20have%20%24n%5E%7B-1%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bn%7D%20%3E%200%24%2C%20thus%20%241%20-%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bn%7D%20%3C%201%24%20for%20all%20%24n%24%2C%20thus%20clearly%20%24M%24%20is%20an%20upper%20bound%20for%20the%20set%20for%20any%20%24M%20%5Cin%20%5Clbrace%20M%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%20%7C%20M%20%5Cge%201%20%5Crbrace%24.%0A%20%20%20%20%09If%20%24M'%20%3C%201%24%2C%20we%20can%20write%20%24M'%20%3D%201%20-%20%5Cvarepsilon%24%20for%20some%20%24%5Cvarepsilon%20%3E%200%24%2C%20which%20implies%20there%20exists%20some%20%24n%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BN%7D%24%20such%20that%20%241%2F%20%5Cvarepsilon%20%3C%20n%2C%201%2Fn%20%3C%20%5Cvarepsilon%24%2C%20thus%20%24M'%20%3D%201%20-%20%5Cvarepsilon%20%3C%201%20-%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bn%7D%24%20for%20such%20%24n%24%2C%20in%20other%20word%2C%20%24M'%24%20is%20not%20a%20upper%20bound%20of%20the%20original%20set.%0A%20%20%20%20%09Thus%20the%20set%20of%20all%20upper%20bound%20for%20this%20set%20is%20indeed%20%24%5Clbrace%20M%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%20%7C%20M%20%5Cge%201%20%5Crbrace%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%203.%20Clearly%20the%20set%20of%20all%20upper%20bounds%20contains%20%24%5Clbrace%20r%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%20%3A%20r%5E3%20%5Cge%208%20%5Crbrace%20%3D%20%5Clbrace%20r%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%20%3A%20r%20%5Cge%202%20%5Crbrace%24.%0A%20%20%20%20%09If%20we%20have%20%24M_0%24%20such%20that%20%24M_0%20%3C%202%24%2C%20by%20following%20exercise%20we%20have%20there%20exists%20a%20rational%20%24M_0%20%3C%20M'%20%3C%202%24%2C%20take%20%24M''%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7BM'%20%2B%202%7D%7B2%7D%24%20then%20%24M''%5E3%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7BM'%5E3%2B%206%20M'%5E2%2B%2012%20M'%2B%208%7D%7B8%7D%20%3C%20%5Cfrac%7B8%20%2B%206%20%5Ccdot%204%20%2B%2012%20%5Ccdot%202%20%2B%208%7D%7B8%7D%20%3D%208%24%2C%20since%20%24(%5Cmathbb%7BQ%7D%2C%20%2B%20%2C%20%5Ccdot)%24%20is%20a%20field%20%24M''%24%20is%20a%20rational.%20%24M''%20%3E%20M_0%24%20thus%20we%20have%20such%20%24M_0%24%20is%20not%20an%20upper%20bound%20of%20the%20original%20set.%20In%20other%20word%2C%20the%20set%20of%20all%20upper%20bounds%20is%20%24%5Clbrace%20r%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%20%3A%20r%20%5Cge%202%20%5Crbrace%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%204.%20From%20previous%20study%20we%20know%20sine%20has%20range%20%24%5B-1%2C%201%5D%24%20in%20with%20real%20variables%2C%20thus%20its%20set%20of%20all%20upper%20bounds%20is%20%24%5Clbrace%20x%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%20%7C%20x%20%5Cge%201%20%5Crbrace%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%207%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Prove%20that%20if%20%24x%20%3C%20y%24%20are%20two%20real%20numbers%2C%20then%20there%20is%20a%20rational%20number%20%24r%24%20with%20%24x%20%3C%20r%20%3C%20y%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%24x%20%3C%20y%20%5Cimplies%20y%20-%20x%20%3E%200%24%2C%20take%20%24%5Cvarepsilon%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7By%20-%20x%7D%7B2%7D%24%2C%20then%20%24y%20-%20x%20%3E%20%5Cvarepsilon%20%3E%200%24%2C%20thus%20there%20exists%20%24n%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BN%7D%24%20such%20that%20%24n%20%3E%201%2F%20%5Cvarepsilon%2C%20%5Cvarepsilon%20%3E%201%2Fn%20%3E%200%24%2C%20thus%20%24y%20-%20x%20%3E%201%2Fn%20%3E%200%20%5Cimplies%20n(y%20-%20x)%20%3D%20ny%20-%20nx%20%3E%201%24%2C%20thus%20there%20exists%20%24m%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D%24%20such%20that%20%24ny%20%3E%20m%20%3E%20nx%20%5Cimplies%20y%3E%20%5Cfrac%7Bm%7D%7Bn%7D%20%3E%20x%24%2C%20by%20definition%20%24%5Cfrac%7Bm%7D%7Bn%7D%24%20is%20a%20rational%2C%20take%20this%20%24%5Cfrac%7Bm%7D%7Bn%7D%20%3D%20r%24%20and%20we%20are%20done.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%208%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Prove%20that%20if%20%24x%24%20is%20irrational%20and%20%24r%24%20is%20a%20non-zero%20rational%20number%2C%20then%20%24x%2Br%24%20and%20%24rx%24%20are%20also%20irrational**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20For%20any%20%24q%2C%20r%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BQ%7D%24%20we%20can%20write%20%24q%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7Bm%7D%7Bn%7D%2C%20r%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7Bm'%7D%7Bn'%7D%24%2C%20thus%20%24q%20-%20r%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7Bmn'-m'%20n%7D%7Bn'%20n%7D%24%20is%20a%20rational%2C%20thus%20we%20have%20the%20statement%20that%20'if%20%24x%20%2B%20r%24%20and%20%24r%24%20are%20rational%2C%20then%20%24x%24%20is%20rational'%2C%20take%20the%20negation%20we%20have%20if%20%24x%24%20is%20irrational%20and%20%24r%24%20is%20rational%20then%20%24x%20%2B%20r%24%20is%20irrational.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Similarly%20under%20the%20additional%20requirement%20that%20%24m'%20%5Cne%200%24%2C%20%24r%5E%7B-1%7D%24%20exists%20and%20%24qr%5E%7B-1%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7Bmn'%7D%7Bnm'%7D%24%20is%20rational%2C%20we%20have%20the%20statement%20that%20'if%20%24xr%24%20and%20%24r%20%5Cne%200%24%20are%20rational%2C%20then%20%24x%24%20is%20rational'%2C%20take%20the%20negation%20we%20have%20if%20%24x%24%20is%20irrational%20and%20%24r%20%5Cne%200%24%20is%20rational%20then%20%24xr%24%20is%20irrational.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%209%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**We%20know%20that%20%24%5Csqrt%7B2%7D%24%20is%20irrational.%20Use%20this%20fact%20and%20the%20previous%20exercise%20to%20prove%20that%20if%20%24r%20%3C%20s%24%20are%20rational%20numbers%2C%20then%20there%20is%20an%20irrational%20number%20x%20with%20%24r%20%3C%20x%20%3C%20s%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Clearly%20%240%20%3C%20%5Cfrac%7B%5Csqrt%7B2%7D%7D%7B2%7D%20%3C%201%24.%20Since%20%24r%20%3C%20s%20%5Cimplies%20s%20-%20r%20%3E%200%24%20we%20have%20%240%20%3C%20%5Cfrac%7B%5Csqrt%7B2%7D%7D%7B2%7D(s%20-%20r)%20%3C%20(s%20-%20r)%24%2C%20add%20%24r%24%20we%20have%20%24r%20%3C%20r%20%2B%20%5Cfrac%7B%5Csqrt%7B2%7D%7D%7B2%7D(s%20-%20r)%20%3C%20s%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20By%20previous%20exercise%20we%20have%20%24r%20%2B%20%5Cfrac%7B%5Csqrt%7B2%7D%7D%7B2%7D(s%20-%20r)%24%20is%20a%20result%20of%20multiplication%20and%20addition%20of%20rational%20numbers%20and%20a%20irrational%20number%20thus%20is%20irrational%2C%20take%20this%20as%20our%20%24x%24%20and%20we%20are%20done.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%20Section%201.5%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%202%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Find%20the%20sup%20and%20inf%20of%20the%20following%20sets.%20Tell%20whether%20each%20set%20has%20a%20maximum%20or%20a%20minimum**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%201.%20%24(1%2C%208%5D%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%202.%20%24%5Clbrace%20%5Cfrac%7Bn%2B2%7D%7Bn%5E2%2B1%7D%20%5Crbrace%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%203.%20%24%5Clbrace%20%5Cfrac%7Bn%7D%7Bm%7D%20%7C%20n%2C%20m%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D%2C%20n%5E2%20%3C%205m%5E2%20%5Crbrace%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%201.%20Clearly%20%24%5Cinf%7BS%7D%20%3D%201%20%5Cnotin%20S%24%20and%20%24%5Csup%5Climits%7BS%7D%20%3D%208%20%5Cin%20S%24.%20%24S%24%20has%20a%20maximum%20but%20not%20a%20minimum%3B%0A%20%20%20%202.%20%24S%20%3D%20%5Clbrace%20%5Cfrac%7B3%7D%7B2%7D%2C%20%5Cfrac%7B4%7D%7B5%7D%2C%20%5Cfrac%7B5%7D%7B9%7D%2C%20%5Cdots%20%5Crbrace%24%20by%20a%20simple%20induction%20step%20we%20see%20%24S%24%20got%20the%20largest%20element%20at%20%24n%20%3D%201%24%2C%20in%20other%20words%2C%20%24%5Csup%5Climits%7BS%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B3%7D%7B2%7D%20%5Cin%20S%24.%0A%20%20%20%20%09Clearly%20%24%5Cfrac%7Bn%2B2%7D%7Bn%5E2%2B1%7D%20%3E%200%24%20and%20claim%20that%20%24%5Cinf%7BS%7D%20%3D%200%20%5Cnotin%20S%24.%20Indeed%2C%20if%20%24m%20%3E%200%24%20is%20a%20lower%20bound%2C%20then%20%24%5Cexists%20n%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BN%7D%24%20such%20that%20%24n%20%3E%20%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7Bm%7D%2B1%2C%20m%3E%20%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7Bn-1%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B2n%2B2%7D%7Bn%5E2%2B%201%7D%3E%20%5Cfrac%7Bn%2B2%7D%7Bn%5E2%2B1%7D%24%20which%20is%20a%20contradiction.%20%24S%24%20has%20a%20maximum%20but%20not%20a%20minimum%3B%0A%20%20%20%203.%20Claim%20that%20%24%5Cinf%7BS%7D%20%3D%20-%20%5Csqrt%7B5%7D%20%5Cnotin%20S%2C%20%5Csup%5Climits%7BS%7D%20%3D%20%5Csqrt%7B5%7D%20%5Cnotin%20S%24.%20Suppose%20%24M%20%3C%20%5Csqrt%7B5%7D%24%20is%20an%20upper%20bound%2C%20by%20previous%20exercise%20there%20exist%20rational%20%24M%20%3C%20M'%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7Bn%7D%7Bm%7D%20%3C%20%5Csqrt%7B5%7D%24%2C%20this%20%24n%2C%20m%24%20do%20satisfy%20the%20condition%20that%20%24n%5E2%20%3C%205%20m%5E2%24%2C%20thus%20%24M%24%20is%20not%20an%20upper%20bound.%20Similar%20with%20the%20lower%20bound.%0A%20%20%20%20%09%24S%24%20has%20neither%20a%20maximum%20nor%20a%20minimum.%20For%20any%20rational%20%240%20%3C%20%5Cfrac%7Bn%7D%7Bm%7D%20%3C%20%5Csqrt%7B5%7D%24%2C%20there%20exists%20rational%20%24%5Cfrac%7Bn%7D%7Bm%7D%20%3C%20%5Cfrac%7Bn'%7D%7Bm'%7D%20%3C%20%5Csqrt%7B5%7D%24%2C%20and%20it%20is%20easy%20to%20see%20%24%5Cfrac%7Bn'%7D%7Bm'%7D%24%20is%20also%20in%20the%20set.%20Similar%20with%20the%20minimum.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%206%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Let%20%24A%24%20and%20%24B%24%20be%20non-empty%20subsets%20of%20%24R%24.%20Then%20%24%5Csup%5Climits%7BA%20-%20B%7D%20%3D%20%5Csup%5Climits%7BA%7D%20-%20%5Cinf%7BB%7D%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%24%5Csup%5Climits%7BA%20-%20B%7D%20%3D%20%5Csup%5Climits%7BA%20%2B%20(-%20B)%7D%20%3D%20%5Csup%5Climits%7BA%7D%20%2B%20%5Csup%5Climits%7B-B%7D%20%3D%20%5Csup%5Climits%7BA%7D%20-%20%5Cinf%7BB%7D%24%20by%20the%20previous%20part%20of%20the%20theorem.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%2010%20-%2013%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Let%20%24f%24%20and%20%24g%24%20be%20functions%20defined%20on%20a%20set%20containing%20%24A%24%20as%20a%20subset%2C%20and%20let%20%24c%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%24%20be%20a%20positive%20constant.%20Then**%3A%0A%0A%20%20%20%201.%20%24%5Csup%5Climits_A%7Bcf%7D%20%3D%20c%20%5Csup%5Climits_A%7Bf%7D%24%20and%20%24%5Cinf%5Climits_A%7Bcf%7D%20%3D%20c%20%5Cinf%5Climits_A%7Bf%7D%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%202.%20%24%5Csup%5Climits_A%7B-f%7D%20%3D%20-%20%5Cinf%5Climits_A%7Bf%7D%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%203.%20%24%5Csup%5Climits_A%7B%5Clbrace%20f%20%2B%20g%20%5Crbrace%7D%20%5Cle%20%5Csup%5Climits_A%7Bf%7D%20%2B%20%5Csup%5Climits_A%7Bg%7D%24%20and%20%24%5Cinf%5Climits_A%7Bf%7D%20%2B%20%5Cinf%5Climits_A%7Bg%7D%20%5Cle%20%5Cinf%5Climits_A%7B%5Clbrace%20f%20%2B%20g%20%5Crbrace%7D%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%204.%20%24%5Csup%5Climits%7B%20%5Clbrace%20f(x)%20-%20f(y)%20%7C%20x%2C%20y%20%5Cin%20A%20%5Crbrace%7D%20%3D%20%5Csup%5Climits_A%7Bf%7D%20-%20%5Cinf%5Climits_A%7Bf%7D%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%201.%20%24%5Csup%5Climits_A%7Bcf%7D%20%3D%20%5Csup%5Climits%7B%20%5Clbrace%20cf(x)%20%7C%20x%20%5Cin%20A%20%5Crbrace%7D%20%3D%20c%20%5Csup%5Climits%7B%20%5Clbrace%20f(x)%20%7C%20x%20%5Cin%20A%20%5Crbrace%7D%20%3D%20c%20%5Csup%5Climits_A%7Bf%7D%24.%20Similar%20with%20%24%5Cinf%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%202.%20%24%5Csup%5Climits_A%7B-f%7D%20%3D%20%5Csup%5Climits%7B%20%5Clbrace%20-f(x)%20%7C%20x%20%5Cin%20A%20%5Crbrace%7D%20%3D%20-%20%5Cinf%7B%20%5Clbrace%20f(x)%20%7C%20x%20%5Cin%20A%20%5Crbrace%7D%20%3D%20-%20%5Cinf%5Climits_A%7Bf%7D%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%203.%20We%20have%3A%0A%20%20%20%20%091.%20%24%5Csup%5Climits_A%7B%5Clbrace%20f%20%2B%20g%20%5Crbrace%7D%20%3D%20%5Csup%5Climits%7B%20%5Clbrace%20f(x)%20%2B%20g(y)%20%7C%20x%2C%20y%20%5Cin%20A%20%5Crbrace%7D%24%20%24%5Cle%5E%7B%5Ctext%7Bby%20Theorem%201.5.7%20(e)%7D%7D%20%5Csup%5Climits%7B%20%5Clbrace%20f(x)%20%2B%20g(x)%20%7C%20x%20%5Cin%20A%20%5Crbrace%7D%20%3D%20%5Csup%5Climits_A%7Bf%7D%20%2B%20%5Csup%5Climits_A%7Bg%7D%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%20%092.%20%24%5Cinf%5Climits_A%7B%5Clbrace%20f%20%2B%20g%20%5Crbrace%7D%20%3D%20%5Cinf%7B%20%5Clbrace%20f(x)%20%2B%20g(y)%20%7C%20x%2C%20y%20%5Cin%20A%20%5Crbrace%7D%24%20%24%5Cge%20%5Cinf%7B%20%5Clbrace%20f(x)%20%2B%20g(x)%20%7C%20x%20%5Cin%20A%20%5Crbrace%7D%20%3D%20%5Cinf%5Climits_A%7Bf%7D%20%2B%20%5Cinf%5Climits_A%7Bg%7D%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%204.%20%24%5Csup%5Climits%7B%20%5Clbrace%20f(x)%20-%20f(y)%20%7C%20x%2C%20y%20%5Cin%20A%20%5Crbrace%7D%20%3D%20%5Csup%5Climits%7B%20%5Clbrace%20f(x)%20%7C%20x%20%5Cin%20A%20%5Crbrace%7D%20%2B%20%5Csup%5Climits%7B%20%5Clbrace%20-%20f(x)%20%7C%20x%20%5Cin%20A%20%5Crbrace%7D%24%20%24%3D%20%5Csup%5Climits%7B%20%5Clbrace%20f(x)%20%7C%20x%20%5Cin%20A%20%5Crbrace%7D%20-%20%5Cinf%7B%20%5Clbrace%20f(x)%20%7C%20x%20%5Cin%20A%20%5Crbrace%7D%20%3D%20%5Csup%5Climits_A%7Bf%7D%20-%20%5Cinf%5Climits_A%7Bf%7D%24.%0A%20%20%20%20%22%22%22)%0A%20%20%20%20return%0A%0A%0A%40app.cell%0Adef%20_(mo)%3A%0A%20%20%20%20mo.md(r%22%22%22%0A%20%20%20%20%23%20Fall%20Semester%20Homework%205%0A%20%20%20%20%22%22%22)%0A%20%20%20%20return%0A%0A%0A%40app.cell%0Adef%20_(mo)%3A%0A%20%20%20%20mo.md(r%22%22%22%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%20Section%202.3%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%204%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Prove%20that%20%24%5Clim%5Climits%20%5Cfrac%7B%5Csin%20n%7D%7Bn%7D%20%3D%200%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20We%20know%20sine%20is%20bounded%20by%20%24-1%24%20and%20%241%24%20on%20the%20real%20line%2C%20thus%20%24-1%2Fn%20%5Cle%20%5Cfrac%7B%5Csin%20n%7D%7Bn%7D%20%5Cle%201%2Fn%24.%20Clearly%20%24%5Clim%5Climits%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bn%7D%20%3D%200%24%20and%20%24%5Clim%5Climits%20-%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bn%7D%20%3D%200%24%2C%20by%20Squeeze%20Theorem%20%24%5Clim%5Climits%20%5Cfrac%7B%5Csin%20n%7D%7Bn%7D%20%3D%200%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%205%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Let%20%24%5Clbrace%20a_n%20%5Crbrace%24%20be%20a%20sequence%20of%20real%20numbers%20such%20that%20%24%5Clim%5Climits%20a_n%20%3D%200%24%2C%20and%20let%20%24%5Clbrace%20b_n%20%5Crbrace%24%20be%20a%20bounded%20sequence.%20Then%20%24%5Clim%5Climits%20a_n%20b_n%20%3D%200%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Say%20%24b_n%24%20is%20bounded%20above%20by%20%24U%24%20and%20bounded%20below%20by%20%24L%24%2C%20take%20%24B%20%3D%20%5Cmax(%7C%20L%20%7C%20%2C%20%7C%20U%20%7C)%24%20then%20we%20have%20%24%7C%20b_n%20%7C%20%5Cle%20B%24.%20Then%20by%20definition%20of%20sequence%20limit%2C%20for%20any%20%24%5Cvarepsilon%20%3E%200%24%2C%20exists%20%24N%24%20such%20that%20%24%7C%20a_n%20%7C%20%5Cle%20%5Cvarepsilon%2FB%24%20for%20all%20%24n%20%3E%20N%24%2C%20thus%20%24%7C%20a_n%20b_n%20%7C%20%3D%20%7C%20a_n%20%5C%7C%20b_n%20%7C%20%5Cle%20%7C%20a_n%20%7C%20B%20%5Cle%20%5Cvarepsilon%24.%20By%20definition%20%24a_n%20b_n%24%20has%20limit%20%240%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%208%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Prove%20that%20if%20%24%5Clbrace%20b_n%20%5Crbrace%24%20is%20a%20sequence%20of%20positive%20terms%20and%20%24b_n%20%5Crightarrow%20b%20%3E%200%24%2C%20then%20there%20is%20a%20number%20%24m%20%3E%200%24%20such%20that%20%24b_n%20%5Cge%20m%24%20for%20all%20%24n%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20We%20will%20prove%20by%20giving%20such%20an%20%24m%24.%20Take%20%24m'%20%3D%20b%2F2%20%3E%200%24%20and%20%24%5Cvarepsilon%20%3D%20b%2F3%20%3E%200%24.%20By%20definition%20of%20sequence%20limit%2C%20there%20exists%20%24N%24%20such%20that%20%24%7C%20b_n%20-%20b%20%7C%20%3C%20b%2F3%24%20for%20all%20%24n%20%3E%20N%24%2C%20since%20%24b_n%24%20positive%2C%20in%20other%20word%20%242b%2F3%20%3C%20b_n%20%3C%204b%2F3%24%20for%20all%20%24n%20%3E%20N%24%2C%20thus%20%24m'%20%3D%20b%2F2%20%3C%202b%2F3%20%3C%20b_n%24%20for%20all%20%24n%20%3E%20N%24.%20Now%20consider%20%24%5Clbrace%20b_1%2C%20b_2%2C%20%5Cdots%2C%20b_%7BN-1%7D%20%5Crbrace%24.%20This%20set%20is%20finite%20thus%20we%20can%20find%20the%20smallest%20element%2C%20say%20it%20is%20%24b_l%24%2C%20clearly%20%24b_l%20%3E%200%24.%20Take%20%24m%20%3D%20%5Cmin(m'%2C%20b_l)%24%20then%20and%20we%20have%20got%20the%20%24m%24%20we%20desired.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%2011%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**For%20each%20natural%20number%20%24n%24%2C%20let%20%24b_n%20%3D%20n%5E%7B1%2Fn%7D%20-%201%24.%20Then%20%24b_n%24%20is%20positive%20and%20%24n%20%3D%20(1%20%2B%20b_n)%5En%24.%20Use%20the%20Binomial%20Theorem%20to%20prove%20that%20%24n%20%5Cge%20%5Cfrac%7Bn(n%20-%201)%7D%7B2%7Db_n%5E2%24%20and%2C%20hence%2C%20that%20%24b_n%20%5Cle%20%5Csqrt%7B%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7Bn%20-%201%7D%7D%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20By%20the%20Binomial%20Theorem%20%24n%20%3D%20(1%20%2B%20b_n)%5En%24%20%24%3D%20%5Cbegin%7Bpmatrix%7D%20n%20%5C%5C%200%20%5Cend%7Bpmatrix%7D%20b_n%5E0%20%2B%20%5Cbegin%7Bpmatrix%7D%20n%20%5C%5C%201%20%5Cend%7Bpmatrix%7D%20b_n%5E1%20%2B%20%5Cbegin%7Bpmatrix%7D%20n%20%5C%5C%202%20%5Cend%7Bpmatrix%7D%20b_n%5E2%20%2B%20%5Cdots%20%2B%20%5Cbegin%7Bpmatrix%7D%20n%20%5C%5C%20n%20%5Cend%7Bpmatrix%7D%20b_n%5En%24%20%24%3D%20%5Cbegin%7Bpmatrix%7D%20n%20%5C%5C%200%20%5Cend%7Bpmatrix%7D%20b_n%5E0%20%2B%20%5Cbegin%7Bpmatrix%7D%20n%20%5C%5C%201%20%5Cend%7Bpmatrix%7D%20b_n%5E1%20%2B%20%5Cfrac%7Bn%20(n%20-%201)%7D%7B2%7D%20b_n%5E2%20%2B%20%5Cdots%20%2B%20%5Cbegin%7Bpmatrix%7D%20n%20%5C%5C%20n%20%5Cend%7Bpmatrix%7D%20b_n%5En%20%5Cge%20%5Cfrac%7Bn%20(n%20-%201)%7D%7B2%7D%20b_n%5E2%24%20because%20clearly%20the%20other%20terms%20are%20all%20non-negative.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Then%20%24%5Cfrac%7Bn%20(n%20-%201)%7D%7B2%7D%20b_n%5E2%20%5Cle%20n%20%5Cimplies%20%5Cfrac%7Bn%20-%201%7D%7B2%7D%20b_n%5E2%20%5Cle%201%20%5Cimplies%20b_n%5E2%20%5Cle%20%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7Bn%20-%201%7D%20%5Cimplies%20b_n%20%5Cle%20%5Csqrt%7B%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7Bn%20-%201%7D%7D%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%2012%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Prove%20that%20%24%5Clim%5Climits%20n%5E%7B1%2Fn%7D%20%3D%201%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Take%20%24b_n%24%20as%20the%20above%20exercise%20stated.%20Then%20for%20any%20%24%5Cvarepsilon%20%3E%200%24%2C%20%24%7C%20b_N%20%7C%20%3D%20b_N%20%5Cle%20%5Csqrt%7B%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7BN-1%7D%7D%24%2C%20take%20%24N%24%20such%20that%20%24%5Csqrt%7B%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7BN-1%7D%7D%20%3C%20%5Cvarepsilon%24%2C%20i.e.%20%24%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7B%5Cvarepsilon%5E2%7D%2B1%20%3C%20N%24%20then%20for%20all%20%24n%20%3E%20N%24%2C%20%24%7C%20b_n%20%7C%20%3C%20%5Cvarepsilon%24%2C%20i.e.%20%24%5Clim%5Climits%20b_n%20%3D%200%24.%20Thus%20%24%5Clim%5Climits(b_n%20%2B%201)%20%3D%200%20%2B%201%20%3D%201%20%5Cimplies%20%5Clim%5Climits%20n%5E%7B1%2Fn%7D%20%3D%201%24.%0A%20%20%20%20%22%22%22)%0A%20%20%20%20return%0A%0A%0A%40app.cell%0Adef%20_(mo)%3A%0A%20%20%20%20mo.md(r%22%22%22%0A%20%20%20%20%23%20Fall%20Semester%20Homework%206%0A%20%20%20%20%22%22%22)%0A%20%20%20%20return%0A%0A%0A%40app.cell%0Adef%20_(mo)%3A%0A%20%20%20%20mo.md(r%22%22%22%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%20Section%202.4%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%201%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Tell%20which%20of%20the%20following%20sequences%20are%20non-increasing%2C%20non-decreasing%2C%20bounded%3F%20Justify%20your%20answers**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%201.%20%24%5Clbrace%20n%5E2%20%5Crbrace%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%202.%20%24%5Clbrace%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B%5Csqrt%7Bn%7D%7D%20%5Crbrace%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%203.%20%24%5Clbrace%20%5Cfrac%7B-1%5En%7D%7Bn%7D%20%5Crbrace%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%204.%20%24%5Clbrace%20%5Cfrac%7Bn%7D%7B2%5En%7D%20%5Crbrace%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%205.%20%24%5Clbrace%20%5Cfrac%7Bn%7D%7Bn%2B1%7D%20%5Crbrace%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%201.%20For%20each%20%24n%24%2C%20%24(n%2B1)%5E2%20%3E%20(n)(n%2B1)%20%3E%20n%5E2%24%20thus%20it%20is%20(strictly)%20increasing.%20It%20is%20unbounded%20as%20for%20any%20%24N%24%2C%20pick%20%24n%20%3D%20N%24%20then%20%24n%5E2%20%3E%20N%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%202.%20For%20each%20%24n%24%2C%20%24%5Csqrt%7Bn%20%2B%201%7D%20%3E%20%5Csqrt%7Bn%7D%24%20thus%20%24%5Csqrt%7Bn%7D%24%20strictly%20increasing%20and%20thus%20%24%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B%5Csqrt%7Bn%7D%7D%24%20(strictly)%20decreasing.%20For%20any%20%24N%24%2C%20pick%20%24n%20%3D%20N%5E2%20%2B%201%24%20then%20%24%5Csqrt%7Bn%7D%20%3E%20N%24%2C%20thus%20%24%5Clim%5Climits%20%5Csqrt%7Bn%7D%20%5Crightarrow%20%5Cinfty%24%2C%20thus%20%24%5Clim%5Climits%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B%5Csqrt%7Bn%7D%7D%20%5Crightarrow%200%24%3B%20since%20it%20converges%2C%20it%20is%20bounded%3B%0A%20%20%20%203.%20This%20sequence%20is%20neither%20non-decreasing%20nor%20non-increasing%2C%20as%20it%20is%20easy%20to%20see%20that%20for%20any%20even%20%24n%24%2C%20%24%5Cfrac%7B-1%5E%7Bn-1%7D%7D%7Bn-1%7D%24%20is%20negative%2C%20%24%5Cfrac%7B-1%5En%7D%7Bn%7D%24%20itself%20is%20positive%20(increasing)%2C%20yet%20%24%5Cfrac%7B-1%5E%7Bn%2B1%7D%7D%7Bn%2B1%7D%24%20is%20again%20negative%20(decreasing).%20By%20Squeeze%20Theorem%20this%20sequence%20converges%20to%20%240%24%2C%20thus%20it%20is%20bounded%3B%0A%20%20%20%204.%20%24%5Cfrac%7Bn%2B1%7D%7B2%5E%7Bn%2B1%7D%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7Bn%2B1%7D%7B2%5E%7Bn%7D%7D%20*%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7Bn%2F2%20%2B%201%2F2%7D%7B2%5E%7Bn%7D%7D%20%5Cle%20%5Cfrac%7Bn%7D%7B2%5E%7Bn%7D%7D%24%20thus%20this%20sequence%20is%20non-increasing.%20Note%20that%20other%20than%20%24n%20%3D%201%24%2C%20the%20sequence%20is%20indeed%20strictly%20decreasing.%20It%20is%20bounded%3A%20it%20is%20non-increasing%20thus%20bounded%20above%20by%20the%20first%20term%20%241%2F2%24%3B%20it%20is%20bounded%20below%20because%20all%20terms%20are%20positive%3B%0A%20%20%20%205.%20%24%5Cfrac%7Bn%2B1%7D%7Bn%2B2%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B(n%2B1)(n%2B1)%2F(n%2B2)%7D%7Bn%2B1%7D%24%2C%20by%20Euclidean%20division%2C%20%24%3D%20%5Cfrac%7Bn%20%2B%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bn%2B2%7D%7D%7Bn%2B1%7D%20%3E%20%5Cfrac%7Bn%7D%7Bn%2B1%7D%24%20thus%20it%20is%20(strictly)%20increasing.%20It%20is%20bounded%3A%20it%20is%20non-decreasing%20thus%20bounded%20below%20by%20the%20first%20term%20%241%2F2%24%3B%20it%20is%20bounded%20above%20because%20%241%20%3E%20%5Cfrac%7Bn%7D%7Bn%20%2B%201%7D%24%20for%20any%20%24n%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%204%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Let%20%24%5Clbrace%20d_n%20%5Crbrace%24%20be%20a%20sequence%20of%20%240%24%20and%20%241%24%20and%20define%20a%20sequence%20of%20numbers%20%24%5Clbrace%20a_n%20%5Crbrace%24%20by%20%24a_n%20%3D%20d_12%5E%7B-1%7D%20%2B%20%5Cdots%20%2B%20d_n2%5E%7B-n%7D%24.%20Prove%20that%20this%20sequence%20converges%20to%20a%20number%20between%20%240%24%20and%20%241%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%24a_n%24%20is%20monotone%3A%20for%20any%20%24n%24%2C%20%24a_%7Bn%2B1%7D%20%3D%20a_%7Bn%7D%20%2B%20d_%7Bn%20%2B%201%7D2%5E%7B-n-1%7D%20%5Cge%20a_%7Bn%7D%24%3B%20%24a_n%24%20is%20bounded%3A%20for%20any%20%24n%24%2C%20%240%20%3D%200%20%5Ccdot%202%5E%7B-1%7D%20%2B%20%5Cdots%20%2B%200%20%5Ccdot%202%5E%7B-n%7D%24%20%24%5Cle%20d_12%5E%7B-1%7D%20%2B%20%5Cdots%20%2B%20d_n2%5E%7B-n%7D%24%20%24%5Cle%201%20%5Ccdot%202%5E%7B-1%7D%20%2B%20%5Cdots%20%2B%201%20%5Ccdot%202%5E%7B-n%7D%24%20%24%3C%201%24.%20Therefor%20%24a_n%24%20converges.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20By%20the%20above%20argument%20we%20see%20%240%20%5Cle%20a_n%20%3C%201%24%20for%20all%20%24n%24%2C%20take%20%24b_n%20%5Cequiv%200%24%20and%20%24b_n%20%5Cequiv%201%24%2C%20by%20Theorem%202.3.8.%2C%20%24a_n%24%20converges%20to%20a%20number%20between%20%240%24%20and%20%241%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%208%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Prove%20that%20%24%5Clim%5Climits%20%5Cfrac%7Bn%5E5%20%2B%203n%5E3%20%2B%202%7D%7Bn%5E4%20-%20n%20%2B%201%7D%20%3D%20%5Cinfty%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20For%20any%20%24n%24%2C%20%24%5Cfrac%7Bn%5E5%20%2B%203n%5E3%20%2B%202%7D%7Bn%5E4%20-%20n%20%2B%201%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7Bn(n%5E4%20-%20n%20%2B%201)%20%2B%203n%5E3%20%2Bn%5E2-n%2B2%7D%7Bn%5E4%20-%20n%20%2B%201%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B3n%5E3%20%2Bn%5E2-n%2B2%7D%7Bn%5E4%20-%20n%20%2B%201%7D%20%2B%20n%24.%20It%20is%20clear%20that%20for%20any%20%24n%20%5Cge%201%2C%203n%5E3%20%2Bn%5E2-n%2B2%20%3E%200%24%20and%20%24n%5E4%20-%20n%20%2B%201%20%3E%200%24%2C%20thus%20%24%5Cfrac%7Bn%5E5%20%2B%203n%5E3%20%2B%202%7D%7Bn%5E4%20-%20n%20%2B%201%7D%20%3E%20n%24.%20Since%20%24n%24%20is%20unbounded%2C%20%24%5Cfrac%7Bn%5E5%20%2B%203n%5E3%20%2B%202%7D%7Bn%5E4%20-%20n%20%2B%201%7D%24%20is%20unbounded%20as%20well.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%2014%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Suppose%20%24%5Clbrace%20a_n%20%5Crbrace%24%20and%20%24%5Clbrace%20b_n%20%5Crbrace%24%20are%20non-decreasing%20sequences%20that%20are%20interlaced%20in%20the%20sense%20that%20each%20term%20of%20the%20sequence%20%24%5Clbrace%20a_n%20%5Crbrace%24%20is%20less%20than%20or%20equal%20to%20some%20term%20of%20the%20sequence%20%24%5Clbrace%20b_n%20%5Crbrace%24%20and%20vice-versa.%20Prove%20that%20%24%5Clim%5Climits%20a_n%20%3D%20%5Clim%5Climits%20b_n%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20First%2C%20since%20%24a_n%2C%20b_n%24%20are%20monotone%2C%20the%20limits%20do%20exist.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Now%2C%20suppose%20%24%5Clim%5Climits%20a_n%20%3C%20%5Clim%5Climits%20b_n%24.%20Choose%20%24%5Cvarepsilon%24%20such%20that%20%24%5Clim%5Climits%20a_n%20%2B%20%5Cvarepsilon%20%3C%20%5Clim%5Climits%20b_n%20-%20%5Cvarepsilon%24%20(we%20can%20do%20that%2C%20even%20if%20%24%5Clim%5Climits%20b_n%24%20is%20infinity).%20Then%20by%20definition%20of%20limit%2C%20there%20exists%20%24N_a%24%20such%20that%20%24%7C%20a_n%20-%20%5Clim%5Climits%20a_n%20%7C%20%3C%20%5Cvarepsilon%24%20for%20all%20%24n%20%3E%20N_a%24%20and%20%24N_b%24%20such%20that%20%24%7C%20b_n%20-%20%5Clim%5Climits%20b_n%20%7C%20%3C%20%5Cvarepsilon%24%20for%20all%20%24n%20%3E%20N_b%24.%20Take%20%24N%20%3D%20%5Cmax%7B(N_a%2C%20N_b)%7D%24%2C%20consider%20the%20term%20%24b_%7BN%2B1%7D%24%3A%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%24b_%7BN%2B1%7D%20%3E%20%5Clim%5Climits%20b_n%20-%20%5Cvarepsilon%20%3E%20%5Clim%5Climits%20a_n%20%2B%20%5Cvarepsilon%24%20thus%20it%20is%20greater%20than%20%24a_n%24%20for%20any%20%24n%20%3E%20N%24%3B%20since%20%24a_n%24%20is%20non-decreasing%2C%20%24a_N%20%5Cge%20a_n%24%20for%20any%20%24n%20%5Cle%20N%24%2C%20thus%20%24b_%7BN%2B1%7D%20%3E%20a_n%24%20for%20all%20%24n%24%2C%20which%20contradict%20the%20assumption%20that%20there%20exists%20some%20%24a_m%24%20such%20that%20%24b_n%24%20is%20less%20than%20or%20equal%20to%20it.%20Thus%20%24%5Clim%5Climits%20a_n%20%5Cge%20%5Clim%5Climits%20b_n%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Similarly%20we%20have%20%24%5Clim%5Climits%20a_n%20%5Cle%20%5Clim%5Climits%20b_n%24%20thus%20they%20are%20equal.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%20Section%202.5%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%201%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Give%20an%20example%20of%20a%20nested%20sequence%20of%20bounded%20open%20intervals%20that%20does%20not%20have%20a%20point%20in%20its%20intersection**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%24(0%2C%201)%20%5Csupseteq%20(0%2C%201%2F2)%20%5Csupseteq%20(0%2C%201%2F3)%20%5Csupseteq%20%5Cdots%24%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Any%20negative%20number%20or%20%240%24%20is%20clearly%20not%20in%20the%20intersection.%20For%20any%20positive%20number%20%24a%24%2C%20by%20convergence%20of%20%24%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bn%7D%24%2C%20there%20exists%20%24n%24%20such%20that%20%241%2Fn%20%3C%20a%24%2C%20thus%20%24a%24%20is%20not%20contained%20in%20%24(0%2C%201%2Fn)%24%20thus%20it%20is%20not%20in%20the%20intersection.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%206%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**For%20each%20of%20the%20following%20sequences%20%24%5Clbrace%20a_n%20%5Crbrace%24%2C%20find%20a%20subsequence%20which%20converges.%20Justify%20your%20answer**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%201.%20%24a_n%20%3D%20(-1)%5En%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%202.%20%24a_n%20%3D%20%5Csin(n%20%5Cpi%2F4)%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%203.%20%24a_n%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7Bn%7D%7B2%5Ek%7D%20-%201%24%20with%20%24k%24%20an%20integer%20chosen%20so%20that%20%242%5Ek%20%5Cle%20n%20%3C%202%5E%7Bk%2B1%7D%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%201.%20Let%20%24n_k%20%3D%201%2C%203%2C%205%2C%20%5Cdots%24%20then%20%24a_%7Bn_k%7D%20%3D%20-1%2C%20-1%2C%20-1%2C%20%5Cdots%24%20is%20constant%20thus%20converges%3B%0A%20%20%20%202.%20Let%20%24n_k%20%3D%204%2C%208%2C%2012%2C%20%5Cdots%24%20then%20%24a_%7Bn_k%7D%20%3D%200%2C%200%2C%200%2C%20%5Cdots%24%20is%20constant%20thus%20converges%3B%0A%20%20%20%203.%20Let%20%24n_k%20%3D%201%2C%202%2C%204%2C%208%2C%2016%2C%20%5Cdots%24%20then%20by%20construction%20%24a_%7Bn_k%7D%20%3D%201%2F1%20-%201%2C%202%2F2%20-%201%2C%204%2F4%20-%201%2C%208%2F8%20-%201%2C%2016%2F16%20-%201%2C%20%5Cdots%24%20is%20constant%20thus%20converges.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%207%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**For%20each%20of%20the%20following%20sequences%2C%20determine%20how%20many%20different%20limits%20of%20subsequences%20there%20are.%20Justify%20your%20answer**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%201.%20%24%5Clbrace%201%20%2B%20-1%5En%20%5Crbrace%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%202.%20%24%5Clbrace%20%5Ccos(n%20%5Cpi%20%2F%203)%20%5Crbrace%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%203.%20%241%2C%201%2F2%2C%201%2C%201%2F2%2C%201%2F3%2C%20%5Cdots%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%201.%20This%20sequence%20can%20achieve%20only%20two%20values%20%240%24%20or%20%242%24%2C%20each%20may%20be%20achieved%20for%20infinitely%20many%20times%2C%20thus%20they%20are%20the%20(only)%20two%20different%20limits%20of%20subsequences.%0A%20%20%20%20%09For%20any%20value%20other%20than%20%240%2C%202%24%2C%20WLOG%20say%20%24a%20%3C%200%24%2C%20then%20there%20exists%20%24%5Cvarepsilon%20%3E%200%24%20such%20that%20%24a%20%2B%20%5Cvarepsilon%20%3C%200%24%20thus%20no%20term%20in%20the%20sequence%20is%20in%20%24(a%20-%20%5Cvarepsilon%2C%20a%2B%20%5Cvarepsilon)%24%20thus%20%24a%24%20cannot%20be%20a%20limit%3B%0A%20%20%20%202.%20Similar%20as%20above%2C%20this%20sequence%20achieves%20only%20three%20values%20%240.5%2C%20-0.5%2C%20-1%24%2C%20each%20may%20be%20achieved%20for%20infinitely%20many%20times%2C%20and%20thus%20they%20are%20the%20only%20three%20different%20limits%20of%20subsequences%3B%0A%20%20%20%203.%20There%20are%20infinitely%20many%20different%20limits%20of%20subsequences%3A%0A%20%20%20%20%09Take%20%24n_k%20%3D%201%2C%203%2C%206%2C%2010%2C%20%5Cdots%24%20then%20%24a_%7Bn_k%7D%20%5Cequiv%201%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%20%09Take%20%24n_k%20%3D%202%2C%204%2C%207%2C%2011%2C%20%5Cdots%24%20then%20%24a_%7Bn_k%7D%20%5Cequiv%201%2F2%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%20%09%24%5Cdots%24%0A%20%20%20%20%09Thus%20we%20can%20find%20a%20subsequence%20with%20limit%20%241%2Fn%24%20for%20any%20%24n%24%2C%20i.e.%20there%20are%20infinitely%20many%20different%20limits.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%2012%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Given%20a%20series%20%24%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bk%20%3D%201%7D%5E%7B%5Cinfty%7D%20a_k%24%2C%20set%20%24s_n%20%3D%20%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bk%20%3D%201%7D%5E%7Bn%7D%20a_k%24%20and%20%24t_n%20%3D%20%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bk%20%3D%201%7D%5E%7Bn%7D%20%7C%20a_k%20%7C%24.%20Prove%20that%20%24%5Clbrace%20s_n%20%5Crbrace%24%20converges%20if%20%24%5Clbrace%20t_n%20%5Crbrace%24%20is%20bounded**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20By%20construction%20%24t_n%24%20is%20monotone%20non-decreasing%2C%20since%20it%20is%20also%20bounded%2C%20it%20converges.%20Thus%20it%20is%20Cauchy.%20In%20other%20word%2C%20for%20any%20%24%5Cvarepsilon%20%3E%200%24%20there%20exists%20%24N%24%20such%20that%20for%20all%20%24n%2C%20m%20%3E%20N%24%2C%20WLOG%20say%20%24n%20%3E%20m%24%2C%20we%20have%20%24%5Cvarepsilon%20%3E%20%7C%20t_n%20-%20t_m%20%7C%20%3D%20%7C%20%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bk%20%3D%201%7D%5E%7Bn%7D%20%7C%20a_k%20%7C%20-%20%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bk%20%3D%201%7D%5E%7Bm%7D%20%7C%20a_k%20%5C%7C%20%3D%20%5C%7C%20a_%7Bn%2B1%7D%20%7C%20%2B%20%7C%20a_%7Bn%2B2%7D%20%7C%20%2B%20%5Cdots%20%2B%20%7C%20a_m%20%5C%7C%24%20%24%5Cge%20%7C%20a_%7Bn%2B1%7D%20%2B%20a_%7Bn%2B2%7D%20%2B%20%5Cdots%20%2B%20a_m%20%7C%20%3D%20%7C%20s_n%20-%20s_m%20%7C%24.%20Thus%20%24s_n%24%20is%20Cauchy%2C%20thus%20it%20converges.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%20Section%202.6%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%201%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Find%20%24%5Climsup%7Ba_n%7D%24%20and%20%24%5Climinf%7Ba_n%7D%24%20for%20the%20following%20sequences**%3A%0A%0A%20%20%20%201.%20%24a_n%20%3D%20-1%5En%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%202.%20%24a_n%20%3D%20(%5Cfrac%7B-1%7D%7Bn%7D)%5En%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%203.%20%24a_n%20%3D%20%5Csin(n%20%5Cpi%2F3)%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%201.%20This%20sequence%20achieves%20only%20two%20values%20%24%5Cpm%201%24%2C%20and%20we%20have%20%24%5Cinf%5Climits_%7Bn%20%5Cge%20k%7Da_n%20%5Cequiv%20-1%24%20and%20%24%5Csup%5Climits_%7Bn%20%5Cge%20k%7Da_n%20%5Cequiv%201%24%2C%20thus%20%24%5Climsup%7Ba_n%7D%20%3D%201%24%20and%20%24%5Climinf%7Ba_n%7D%20%3D%20-1%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%202.%20We%20have%20%24-(%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bn%7D)%5En%20%5Cle%20a_n%20%5Cle%20(%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bn%7D)%5En%24%20thus%20by%20Squeeze%20Theorem%20%24a_n%20%5Crightarrow%200%24%2C%20and%20thus%20%24%5Climsup%7Ba_n%7D%20%3D%20%5Climinf%7Ba_n%7D%20%3D%200%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%203.%20Similar%20with%20the%20first%20part%2C%20this%20sequence%20achieves%20only%20%24%5Cfrac%7B%5Csqrt%7B3%7D%7D%7B2%7D%2C%200%2C%20-%20%5Cfrac%7B%5Csqrt%7B3%7D%7D%7B2%7D%24%20thus%20%24%5Cinf%5Climits_%7Bn%20%5Cge%20k%7Da_n%20%5Cequiv%20-%20%5Cfrac%7B%5Csqrt%7B3%7D%7D%7B2%7D%24%20and%20%24%5Csup%5Climits_%7Bn%20%5Cge%20k%7Da_n%20%5Cequiv%20%5Cfrac%7B%5Csqrt%7B3%7D%7D%7B2%7D%24%2C%20thus%20%24%5Climsup%7Ba_n%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B%5Csqrt%7B3%7D%7D%7B2%7D%24%20and%20%24%5Climinf%7Ba_n%7D%20%3D%20-%20%5Cfrac%7B%5Csqrt%7B3%7D%7D%7B2%7D%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%204%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**If%20%24%5Climsup%7Ba_n%7D%24%20and%20%24%5Climsup%7Bb_n%7D%24%20are%20finite%2C%20prove%20that%20%24%5Climsup%7Ba_n%20%2B%20b_n%7D%20%5Cle%20%5Climsup%7Ba_n%7D%20%2B%20%5Climsup%7Bb_n%7D%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Consider%20the%20inequality%20%24%5Csup%5Climits_%7Bn%20%5Cge%20k%7Da_n%20%2B%20%5Csup%5Climits_%7Bn%20%5Cge%20k%7Db_n%20%5Cge%20a_l%20%2B%20b_l%24%20for%20any%20%24l%20%3E%20k%24%2C%20thus%20by%20definition%20%24%5Csup%5Climits_%7Bn%20%5Cge%20k%7Da_n%20%2B%20%5Csup%5Climits_%7Bn%20%5Cge%20k%7Db_n%24%20is%20an%20upper%20bound%20for%20%24a_n%20%2B%20b_n%24%20thus%20we%20have%3A%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%24%5Csup%5Climits_%7Bn%20%5Cge%20k%7Da_n%20%2B%20%5Csup%5Climits_%7Bn%20%5Cge%20k%7Db_n%20%5Cge%20%5Csup%5Climits_%7Bn%20%5Cge%20k%7D(a_n%20%2B%20b_n)%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Now%20take%20limit%20each%20side%2C%20we%20have%20%24%5Climsup%7Ba_n%20%2B%20b_n%7D%20%5Cle%20%5Climsup%7Ba_n%7D%20%2B%20%5Climsup%7Bb_n%7D%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%205%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**If%20%24%5Climsup%7Ba_n%7D%24%20is%20finite%2C%20prove%20that%20%24%5Climinf%7B-a_n%7D%20%3D%20-%20%5Climsup%7Ba_n%7D%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Similarly%2C%20we%20have%20learnt%20before%20that%20%24%5Cinf%5Climits_%7Bn%20%5Cge%20k%7D-a_n%20%3D%20-%20%5Csup%5Climits_%7Bn%20%5Cge%20k%7Da_n%24%2C%20take%20limit%20each%20side%20we%20have%20%24%5Climinf%7B-a_n%7D%20%3D%20-%20%5Climsup%7Ba_n%7D%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%208%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**If%20%24%5Clbrace%20a_n%20%5Crbrace%24%20and%20%24%5Clbrace%20b_n%20%5Crbrace%24%20are%20non-negative%20sequences%20and%20%24%5Clbrace%20b_n%20%5Crbrace%24%20converges%2C%20prove%20that%20%24%5Climsup%7Ba_n%20b_n%7D%20%3D%20(%5Climsup%7Ba_n%7D)(%5Clim%5Climits%7Bb_n%7D)%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Consider%20the%20inequality%20%24%5Csup%5Climits_%7Bn%20%5Cge%20k%7Da_n%20%5Csup%5Climits_%7Bn%20%5Cge%20k%7Db_n%20%5Cge%20a_l%20b_l%24%20for%20any%20%24l%20%3E%20k%24%2C%20thus%20%24%5Csup%5Climits_%7Bn%20%5Cge%20k%7Da_n%20b_n%20%5Cle%20%5Csup%5Climits_%7Bn%20%5Cge%20k%7Da_n%20%5Csup%5Climits_%7Bn%20%5Cge%20k%7Db_n%24.%20Take%20limit%20each%20side%20we%20have%20%24%5Climsup%5Climits_%7Bn%20%5Cge%20k%7Da_n%20b_n%20%5Cle%20%5Clim%5Climits(%5Csup%5Climits_%7Bn%20%5Cge%20k%7Da_n%20%5Csup%5Climits_%7Bn%20%5Cge%20k%7Db_n)%20%3D%20(%5Climsup%5Climits_%7Bn%20%5Cge%20k%7Da_n)%20(%5Climsup%5Climits_%7Bn%20%5Cge%20k%7Db_n)%24.%20Since%20%24b_n%24%20converges%2C%20%24%5Climsup%5Climits_%7Bn%20%5Cge%20k%7Db_n%20%3D%20%5Clim%5Climits%7Bb_n%7D%24%2C%20thus%20we%20have%20%24%5Climsup%7Ba_n%20b_n%7D%20%3D%20(%5Climsup%7Ba_n%7D)(%5Clim%5Climits%7Bb_n%7D)%24.%0A%20%20%20%20%22%22%22)%0A%20%20%20%20return%0A%0A%0A%40app.cell%0Adef%20_(mo)%3A%0A%20%20%20%20mo.md(r%22%22%22%0A%20%20%20%20%23%20Fall%20Semester%20Homework%207%0A%20%20%20%20%22%22%22)%0A%20%20%20%20return%0A%0A%0A%40app.cell%0Adef%20_(mo)%3A%0A%20%20%20%20mo.md(r%22%22%22%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%20Section%203.1%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%205%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Show%20that%20the%20function%20%24f(x)%20%3D%20%7C%20x%20%7C%24%20is%20continuous%20on%20all%20of%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20For%20any%20%24x%2C%20x'%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%24%2C%20we%20have%20%24%5C%7C%20x%20%7C%20-%20%7C%20x'%20%5C%7C%20%5Cle%20%7C%20x%20-%20x'%20%7C%24%2C%20thus%20simply%20take%20%24%5Cdelta%20%3D%20%5Cvarepsilon%24%2C%20we%20have%20%24%7C%20x%20-%20x'%20%7C%20%3C%20%5Cdelta%20%5Cimplies%20%7C%20f(x)%20-%20f(x')%20%7C%20%5Cle%20%7C%20x%20-%20x'%20%7C%20%3C%20%5Cdelta%20%3D%20%5Cvarepsilon%24%2C%20which%20implies%20continuity%20by%20definition.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%209%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Consider%20the%20function%20%24f(x)%20%3D%20%5Cbegin%7Bcases%7D%201%20%5Ctext%7B%2C%20if%20%7Dx%20%5Cge%200%20%5C%5C%20-1%20%5Ctext%7B%2C%20if%20%7Dx%20%3C%200%20%5Cend%7Bcases%7D%24%2C%20is%20this%20function%20continuous%20if%20its%20domain%20is%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%24%3F%20Is%20it%20continuous%20if%20its%20domain%20is%20cut%20down%20to%20%24%5Clbrace%20x%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%20%7C%20x%20%5Cge%200%20%5Crbrace%24%3F%20How%20about%20if%20its%20domain%20is%20%24%5Clbrace%20x%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%20%7C%20x%20%5Cle%200%20%5Crbrace%24**%3F%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%201.%20Consider%20%24x'%20%3D%200%24%20and%20%24%5Cvarepsilon%20%3D%201%2F2%24.%20For%20any%20%24%5Cdelta%20%3E%200%24%2C%20%24%5Clbrace%20x%20%5C%7C%20x%20-%20x'%20%7C%20%3C%20%5Cdelta%20%5Crbrace%20%3D%20(x'%20-%20%5Cdelta%2C%20x'%20%2B%20%5Cdelta)%20%3D%20(-%20%5Cdelta%2C%20%5Cdelta)%24%2C%20then%20%24-%20%5Cdelta%2F2%24%20is%20clearly%20in%20this%20interval%20and%20it%20is%20a%20negative%20real%20number%2C%20by%20construction%20%24f(-%20%5Cdelta%2F2)%20%3D%20-1%24%20thus%20%24%7C%20f(-%20%5Cdelta%2F2)%20-%20f(x')%20%7C%20%3D%201%20%3E%201%2F2%20%3D%20%5Cvarepsilon%24.%20In%20other%20word%2C%20we%20have%20an%20%24%5Cvarepsilon%24%20such%20that%20for%20any%20%24%5Cdelta%24%2C%20%24%7C%20x%20-%20x'%20%7C%20%3C%20%5Cdelta%24%20does%20not%20imply%20that%20%24%7C%20f(x)%20-%20f(x')%20%7C%20%3C%20%5Cvarepsilon%24%20Thus%20%24f%24%20is%20not%20continuous%20at%20%240%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%202.%20%24f%20%7C_%7B%5Clbrace%20x%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%20%7C%20x%20%5Cge%200%20%5Crbrace%7D%24%20is%20by%20construction%20a%20constant%20function%2C%20thus%20it%20is%20clearly%20continuous%3B%0A%20%20%20%203.%20%24f%20%7C_%7B%5Clbrace%20x%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%20%7C%20x%20%5Cle%200%20%5Crbrace%7D%24%20is%20not%20continuous%20at%20%240%24%20by%20the%20same%20argument%20with%20(i).%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%2011%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Prove%20that%20the%20function%20%24f(x)%20%3D%20%5Cbegin%7Bcases%7D%20%5Csin(1%2Fx)%20%5Ctext%7B%2C%20if%20%7Dx%20%5Cne%200%20%5C%5C%200%20%5Ctext%7B%2C%20if%20%7Dx%20%3D%200%20%5Cend%7Bcases%7D%24%20is%20not%20continuous%20at%20%240%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20First%20recall%20that%20%24%5Csin(y)%20%3D%201%24%20at%20%24y%20%3D%20%5Cdots%2C%20%5Cfrac%7B%5Cpi%7D%7B2%7D%2C%20%5Cfrac%7B5%20%5Cpi%7D%7B2%7D%2C%20%5Cdots%24%2C%20i.e.%20%24y%24%20is%20of%20the%20form%20%24%5Cfrac%7B(1%20%2B%204n)%20%5Cpi%7D%7B2%7D%2C%20n%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D%24%20thus%20%24%5Csin(1%2Fx)%20%3D%201%24%20at%20%24x%20%3D%20%5Cdots%2C%20%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7B%5Cpi%7D%2C%20%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7B5%20%5Cpi%7D%2C%20%5Cdots%24%2C%20i.e.%20%24x%24%20is%20of%20the%20form%20%24%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7B(1%20%2B%204n)%20%5Cpi%7D%2C%20n%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Now%20consider%20%24x'%20%3D%200%24%20and%20%24%5Cvarepsilon%20%3D%201%2F2%24.%20For%20any%20fixed%20%24%5Cdelta%20%3E%200%24%2C%20by%20taking%20large%20enough%20%24n_0%24%2C%20clearly%20we%20have%20some%20%24x%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7B(1%20%2B%204n_0)%20%5Cpi%7D%20%3C%20%5Cdelta%24%2C%20but%20then%20%24%7C%20x%20-%20x'%20%7C%20%3D%20x%20-%200%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7B(1%20%2B%204n_0)%20%5Cpi%7D%20%3C%20%5Cdelta%24%20with%20%24%7C%20f(x)%20-%20f(x')%20%7C%20%3D%201%20%5Cge%20%5Cvarepsilon%24.%20Thus%20%24f%24%20is%20not%20continuous%20at%20%240%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%2012%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Prove%20that%20the%20function%20%24f(x)%20%3D%20%5Cbegin%7Bcases%7D%20x%20%5Csin(1%2Fx)%20%5Ctext%7B%2C%20if%20%7Dx%20%5Cne%200%20%5C%5C%200%20%5Ctext%7B%2C%20if%20%7Dx%20%3D%200%20%5Cend%7Bcases%7D%24%20is%20continuous%20at%20%240%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Consider%20%24x'%20%3D%200%24%2C%20then%20%24%7C%20f(x)%20-%20f(x')%20%7C%20%3D%20%7C%20x%20%5Csin(1%2Fx)%20%7C%20%5Cle%20%7C%20x%20%7C%24%20since%20%24%5Csin(1%2Fx)%24%20is%20bounded%20by%20%24-1%24%20and%20%241%24.%20Thus%20simply%20take%20%24%5Cdelta%20%3D%20%5Cvarepsilon%24%20then%20we%20have%20%24%7C%20x%20-%200%20%7C%20%3C%20%5Cdelta%20%5Cimplies%20%7C%20f(x)%20-%20f(0)%20%7C%20%5Cle%20%7C%20x%20%7C%20%3C%20%5Cdelta%20%3D%20%5Cvarepsilon%24.%20By%20definition%20we%20have%20%24f%24%20continuous%20at%20%240%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%20Section%203.2%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%202%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Prove%20that%20if%20%24f%24%20is%20a%20continuous%20function%20on%20a%20closed%20bounded%20interval%20%24I%24%20and%20if%20%24f(x)%24%20is%20never%20%240%24%20for%20%24x%20%5Cin%20I%24%2C%20then%20there%20is%20a%20number%20%24m%20%3E%200%24%20such%20that%20%24f(x)%20%5Cge%20m%24%20for%20all%20%24x%20%5Cin%20I%24%20or%20%24f(x)%20%5Cle%20-m%24%20for%20all%20%24x%20%5Cin%20I%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Suppose%20that%20%24%5Cexists%20x_0%2C%20x_1%20%5Cin%20I%24%20such%20that%20%24f(x_0)%20%3C%200%20%3C%20f(x_1)%24%2C%20then%20by%20IVT%20%24f%24%20must%20achieve%20%240%24%20in%20%24I%24%2C%20which%20contradict%20our%20construction.%20Thus%20%24%5Cforall%20x%20%5Cin%20f(x)%2C%20f(x)%20%3C%200%24%20or%20%24f(x)%20%3E%200%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20If%20%24f(x)%20%3C%200%24%20for%20all%20%24x%24%2C%20by%20EVT%2C%20%24f%24%20achieves%20its%20maximum%20in%20%24I%24%2C%20i.e.%20%24f(x)%20%5Cle%20M%24%20for%20some%20%24M%24%2C%20notice%20this%20%24M%24%20must%20be%20strictly%20negative%20(because%20it%20is%20achievable)%20thus%20if%20we%20take%20%24m%20%3D%20-M%20%3E%200%24%2C%20then%20%24f(x)%20%5Cle%20-m%24%20for%20all%20%24x%20%5Cin%20I%24%3B%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Similarly%20if%20%24f(x)%20%3E%200%24%20for%20all%20%24x%24%2C%20take%20%24m%24%20as%20its%20minimum%20then%20we%20have%20%24f(x)%20%5Cge%20m%24%20for%20all%20%24x%20%5Cin%20I%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%204%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Find%20an%20example%20of%20a%20function%20which%20is%20continuous%20on%20a%20bounded%20interval%20%24I%24%20but%20is%20not%20bounded.%20Then%20find%20an%20example%20of%20a%20function%20which%20is%20continuous%20and%20bounded%20on%20a%20bounded%20interval%20%24I%24%2C%20but%20does%20not%20have%20a%20maximum%20value**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%201.%20%24f%3A%20(-%20%5Cpi%2F2%2C%20%5Cpi%2F2)%20%5Crightarrow%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%24%20given%20by%20%24x%20%5Cmapsto%20%5Ctan(x)%24%20is%20clearly%20continuous%2C%20%24(-%20%5Cpi%2F2%2C%20%5Cpi%2F2)%24%20is%20bounded%2C%20but%20its%20range%20is%20not%20bounded%3B%0A%20%20%20%202.%20Then%20consider%20%24f%3A%20(-1%2C%201)%24%20(it%20could%20be%20any%20open%20interval%20in%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%24)%20%24%5Crightarrow%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%24%20given%20by%20%24x%20%5Cmapsto%20%5Carctan%7Bx%7D%24%20then%20%24f%24%20is%20strictly%20increasing%20thus%20its%20maximum%20is%20never%20achieved%2C%20but%20%24f%24%20is%20continuous%20and%20bounded%20(by%20%24-%20%5Cpi%2F2%2C%20%5Cpi%2F2%24)%20on%20the%20given%20bounded%20domain.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%205%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Find%20an%20example%20of%20a%20function%20which%20is%20continuous%20on%20a%20closed%20interval%20%24I%24%20but%20is%20not%20bounded.%20Then%20find%20an%20example%20of%20a%20function%20which%20is%20continuous%20and%20bounded%20on%20a%20closed%20interval%20%24I%24%2C%20but%20does%20not%20have%20a%20maximum%20value**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%201.%20Notice%20that%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%24%20itself%20is%20closed%20on%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%24%2C%20so%20the%20identity%20map%20from%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%24%20to%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%24%20is%20an%20unbounded%20continuous%20function%20on%20a%20closed%20interval%3B%0A%20%20%20%202.%20The%20above%20example%20%24f%3A%20(-1%2C%201)%20%5Crightarrow%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%24%20given%20by%20%24x%20%5Cmapsto%20%5Carctan%7Bx%7D%24%20would%20still%20work%2C%20if%20we%20simply%20extend%20%24f%24%20to%20the%20entire%20real%20line.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%207%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Show%20that%20if%20%24f%24%20and%20%24g%24%20are%20continuous%20functions%20on%20the%20interval%20%24%5Ba%2C%20b%5D%24%20such%20that%20%24f(a)%20%3C%20g(a)%24%20and%20%24g(b)%20%3C%20f(b)%24%20then%20there%20is%20a%20number%20%24c%20%5Cin%20(a%2C%20b)%24%20such%20that%20%24f(c)%20%3D%20g(c)%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Define%20%24F%24%20be%20a%20function%20on%20the%20interval%20%24%5Ba%2C%20b%5D%24%20given%20by%20%24F(a)%20%3D%20f(a)%20-%20g(a)%24%2C%20then%20%24F%24%20is%20constructed%20by%20two%20continuous%20functions%20with%20minus%20operation%20thus%20is%20continuous.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20We%20have%20%24f(a)%20%3C%20g(a)%20%5Cimplies%20F(a)%20%3D%20f(a)%20-%20g(a)%20%3C%200%24%20and%20similarly%20%24F(b)%20%3D%20f(b)%20-%20g(b)%20%3E%200%24%2C%20by%20IVT%20we%20conclude%20that%20%24F%24%20achieves%20%240%24%20on%20%24(a%2C%20b)%24%2C%20in%20other%20word%2C%20there%20is%20a%20number%20%24c%20%5Cin%20(a%2C%20b)%24%20such%20that%20%24f(c)%20%3D%20g(c)%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%208%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Let%20%24f%24%20be%20a%20continuous%20function%20from%20%24%5B0%2C%201%5D%24%20to%20%24%5B0%2C%201%5D%24.%20Prove%20there%20is%20a%20point%20%24c%20%5Cin%20%5B0%2C%201%5D%24%20such%20that%20%24f(c)%20%3D%20c%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Define%20%24F%24%20be%20a%20function%20on%20%24%5B0%2C%201%5D%24%20by%20%24F(a)%20%3D%20f(a)%20-%20a%24%2C%20then%20%24F%24%20is%20constructed%20by%20two%20continuous%20functions%20with%20minus%20operation%20thus%20is%20continuous.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20If%20%24f(0)%20%3D%200%24%20or%20%24f(1)%20%3D%201%24%20then%20we%20are%20done.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Otherwise%2C%20since%20the%20codomain%20of%20%24f%24%20is%20%24%5B0%2C%201%5D%24%2C%20we%20have%20%24f(0)%20%3E%200%24%2C%20%24f(1)%20%3C%201%24%2C%20thus%20%24F(0)%20%3D%20f(0)%20-%200%20%3E%200%24%20and%20%24F(1)%20%3D%20f(1)%20-%201%20%3C%200%24%2C%20again%20by%20IVT%20we%20conclude%20that%20%24F%24%20achieves%20%240%24%20and%20thus%20%24f%24%20has%20a%20fixed%20point.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%209%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Use%20the%20IVT%20to%20prove%20that%2C%20if%20%24n%24%20is%20a%20natural%20number%2C%20then%20every%20positive%20number%20%24a%24%20has%20a%20positive%20%24n%24-th%20root**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20For%20each%20given%20%24n%24%20consider%20the%20function%20%24f%3A%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D_%7B%5Cge%200%7D%20%5Cimplies%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%24%20given%20by%20%24x%20%5Cmapsto%20x%5En%24.%20Clearly%20%24f(0)%20%3D%200%24%2C%20thus%20%24f(0)%20%3C%20a%24%20for%20any%20positive%20%24a%24.%20Now%20take%20%24x%20%3D%20%5Cmax%7B(1%2C%20a)%7D%24%2C%20then%20if%20%24a%20%5Cle%201%24%20then%20%24f(x)%20%3D%201%5En%20%3D%201%20%5Cge%20a%24%2C%20if%20%24a%20%3E%201%24%20then%20%24f(x)%20%3D%20a%5En%20%5Cge%20a%24%20for%20all%20natural%20%24n%24.%20In%20either%20case%2C%20we%20have%20%24f(0)%20%3C%20a%20%5Cle%20f(x)%24%2C%20thus%20%24a%24%20is%20a%20value%20that%20%24f%24%20achieves%20by%20IVT%2C%20in%20other%20word%2C%20there%20exists%20%24a'%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D_%7B%5Cge%200%7D%24%20such%20that%20%24a'%5En%20%3D%20a%24%2C%20where%20%24a'%24%20could%20be%20considered%20as%20a%20positive%20%24n%24-th%20root%20of%20this%20arbitrary%20positive%20%24a%24.%0A%20%20%20%20%22%22%22)%0A%20%20%20%20return%0A%0A%0A%40app.cell%0Adef%20_(mo)%3A%0A%20%20%20%20mo.md(r%22%22%22%0A%20%20%20%20%23%20Fall%20Semester%20Homework%208%0A%20%20%20%20%22%22%22)%0A%20%20%20%20return%0A%0A%0A%40app.cell%0Adef%20_(mo)%3A%0A%20%20%20%20mo.md(r%22%22%22%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%20Section%203.3%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%201%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Is%20the%20function%20%24f(x)%20%3D%20x%5E2%24%20uniformly%20continuous%20on%20%24(0%2C1)%24%3F%20Justify%20your%20answer**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%20If%20we%20extend%20the%20domain%20to%20%24%5B0%2C%201%5D%24%2C%20%24f%24%20is%20still%20well%20defined.%20Notice%20that%20%24f%24%20(being%20a%20product%20of%20inclusion%20maps)%20is%20continuous%20on%20%24%5B0%2C%201%5D%24%2C%20a%20closed%20and%20bounded%20interval%2C%20thus%20%24f%24%20is%20uniformly%20continuous%20on%20%24%5B0%2C%201%5D%24%2C%20thus%20it%20is%20clearly%20also%20uniformly%20continuous%20on%20a%20subset%20%24(0%2C%201)%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%202%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Is%20the%20function%20%24f(x)%20%3D%201%2Fx%5E2%24%20uniformly%20continuous%20on%20%24(0%2C1)%24%3F%20Justify%20your%20answer**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Let%20%24%5Cvarepsilon%20%3D%201%24%2C%20for%20any%20%24%5Cdelta%20%3E%200%24%2C%20take%20%24n%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BN%7D%24%20such%20that%20%24%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bn%7D%20%3C%20%5Cdelta%24%2C%20then%20if%20we%20take%20%24x_1%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bn%7D%2C%20x_2%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7Bn%7D%24%2C%20then%20%24%7C%20x_1%20-%20x_2%20%7C%20%3C%20%5Cdelta%24%2C%20while%20%24%7C%20f(x_1)%20-%20f(x_2)%20%7C%20%3D%20%7C%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bn%7D%7D%20-%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7Bn%7D%7D%20%7C%20%3D%20%7C%20n%20-%20%5Cfrac%7Bn%7D%7B2%7D%20%7C%20%3D%20%7C%20%5Cfrac%7Bn%7D%7B2%7D%20%7C%24%2C%20since%20%24n%24%20can%20be%20taken%20arbitrarily%20large%2C%20this%20value%20is%20clearly%20large%20than%20%24%5Cvarepsilon%24.%20By%20definition%2C%20%24f%24%20is%20not%20uniformly%20continuous%20on%20%24(0%2C%201)%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%203%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Is%20the%20function%20%24f(x)%20%3D%20x%5E2%24%20uniformly%20continuous%20on%20%24(0%2C%20%5Cinfty)%24%3F%20Justify%20your%20answer**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Let%20%24%5Cvarepsilon%20%3D%201%24%2C%20for%20any%20%24%5Cdelta%20%3E%200%24%2C%20take%20%24n%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BN%7D%24%20such%20that%20%24%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bn%7D%20%3C%20%5Cdelta%24%2C%20then%20if%20we%20take%20%24x_1%20%3D%20n%2C%20x_2%20%3D%20n%20%2B%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bn%7D%24%2C%20then%20%24%7C%20x_1%20-%20x_2%20%7C%20%3C%20%5Cdelta%24%2C%20while%20%24%7C%20f(x_1)%20-%20f(x_2)%20%7C%20%3D%20%7C%20n%5E2%20-%20n%5E2%20-%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bn%5E2%7D%20-%202%20%7C%20%3D%202%20%2B%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bn%5E2%7D%20%3E%201%20%3D%20%5Cvarepsilon%24.%20By%20definition%2C%20%24f%24%20is%20not%20uniformly%20continuous%20on%20%24(0%2C%20%5Cinfty)%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%204%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Using%20only%20the%20%24%5Cvarepsilon%20-%20%5Cdelta%24%20definition%20of%20uniform%20continuity%2C%20prove%20that%20the%20function%20%24f(x)%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7Bx%7D%7Bx%20%2B%201%7D%24%20is%20uniformly%20continuous%20on%20%24%5B0%2C%20%5Cinfty)%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Let%20%24x%20%5Cne%20y%20%5Cin%20%5B0%2C%20%5Cinfty)%24%20be%20two%20arbitrary%20points%2C%20then%20%24%7C%20f(x)%20-%20f(y)%20%7C%20%3D%20%7C%20%5Cfrac%7Bx%7D%7Bx%2B1%7D%20-%20%5Cfrac%7By%7D%7By%2B1%7D%20%7C%20%3D%20%7C%20%5Cfrac%7Bx(y%2B1)%20-%20y(x%2B1)%7D%7B(x%2B1)(y%2B1)%7D%20%7C%20%3D%20%7C%20%5Cfrac%7Bx%20-%20y%7D%7B(x%2B1)(y%2B1)%7D%20%7C%20%5Cle%20%7C%20x%20-%20y%20%7C%24.%20Thus%20simply%20let%20%24%5Cdelta%20%3D%20%5Cvarepsilon%24%2C%20then%20%24%7C%20x%20-%20y%20%7C%20%3C%20%5Cdelta%20%5Cimplies%20%7C%20f(x)%20-%20f(y)%20%7C%20%5Cle%20%7C%20x%20-%20y%20%7C%20%3C%20%5Cvarepsilon%24%2C%20for%20any%20%24%5Cvarepsilon%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%205%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Show%20that%20%24%5Csqrt%7Bx%7D%24%20is%20uniformly%20continuous%20on%20%24%5B0%2C%201%5D%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20We%20know%20from%20previous%20materials%20that%20%24%5Csqrt%7Bx%7D%24%20is%20continuous%20on%20%24%5B0%2C%201%5D%24%2C%20since%20%24%5B0%2C%201%5D%24%20is%20closed%20and%20bounded%2C%20%24f%24%20is%20also%20uniformly%20continuous%20on%20it.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%208%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Let%20%24f%24%20be%20a%20function%20defined%20on%20an%20interval%20%24I%24%20and%20suppose%20that%20there%20are%20positive%20constants%20%24K%24%20and%20%24r%24%20such%20that%20%24%7C%20f(x)%20-%20f(y)%20%7C%20%5Cle%20K%20%7C%20x%20-%20y%20%7C%5Er%24%20for%20all%20%24x%2C%20y%20%5Cin%20I%24.%20Prove%20that%20%24f%24%20is%20uniformly%20continuous**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Since%20%24K%24%20and%20%24r%24%20are%20fixed%2C%20then%20for%20any%20%24%5Cvarepsilon%24%2C%20take%20%24%5Cdelta%20%3D%20%5Csqrt%5Br%5D%7B%5Cfrac%7B%5Cvarepsilon%7D%7BK%7D%7D%24%2C%20then%20%24%7C%20f(x)%20-%20f(y)%20%7C%20%5Cle%20K%20%7C%20x%20-%20y%20%7C%5Er%20%3C%20K%20(%5Csqrt%5Br%5D%7B%5Cfrac%7B%5Cvarepsilon%7D%7BK%7D%7D)%5Er%20%3D%20%5Cvarepsilon%24.%20By%20definition%20%24f%24%20is%20uniformly%20continuous.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%209%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Is%20the%20function%20%24f(x)%20%3D%20%5Csin(1%2Fx)%24%20continuous%20on%20%24(0%2C%201)%24%3F%20Is%20it%20uniformly%20continuous%20on%20%24(0%2C%201)%24%3F%20Justify%20your%20answer**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%24f%24%20is%20a%20composition%20of%20the%20sine%20function%20and%20a%20function%20of%20the%20form%20%24x%5Er%24%2C%20thus%20on%20their%20natural%20domain%2C%20%24f%24%20is%20continuous.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20For%20previous%20homework%20we%20have%20%24%5Csin(1%2Fx)%20%3D%201%24%20at%20%24x%20%3D%20%5Cdots%2C%20%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7B%5Cpi%7D%2C%20%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7B5%20%5Cpi%7D%2C%20%5Cdots%24%2C%20i.e.%20%24x%24%20is%20of%20the%20form%20%24%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7B(4n%20%2B%201)%20%5Cpi%7D%2C%20n%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D%24.%20Similarly%20we%20have%20%24%5Csin(1%2Fx)%20%3D%20-1%24%20at%20%24x%24%20with%20the%20form%20%24%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7B(4n%20-%201)%20%5Cpi%7D%2C%20n%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D%24%20or%20%24%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7B(4n%20%2B%203)%20%5Cpi%7D%2C%20n%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20For%20any%20%24%5Cdelta%24%2C%20clearly%20if%20we%20take%20sufficiently%20large%20%24n%24%20then%20we%20would%20have%20%24%7C%20%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7B(4n%20-%201)%20%5Cpi%7D%20-%20%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7B(4n%20%2B%201)%20%5Cpi%7D%20%7C%20%3C%20%5Cdelta%24%2C%20but%20the%20distance%20of%20their%20images%20is%20a%20constant%20%242%24.%20Thus%20%24f%24%20is%20not%20uniformly%20continuous%20on%20%24(0%2C%201)%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%2010%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Is%20the%20function%20%24f(x)%20%3D%20x%20%5Csin(1%2Fx)%24%20uniformly%20continuous%20on%20%24(0%2C%201)%24%3F%20Justify%20your%20answer**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%20We%20proved%20in%20the%20last%20homework%20that%20if%20we%20define%20%24f(0)%20%3D%200%24%20then%20the%20extension%20of%20%24f%24%20on%20%24%5B0%2C%201%5D%24%20is%20continuous%20(the%20case%20at%20%241%24%20is%20natural)%2C%20thus%20%24f%24%20is%20uniformly%20continuous%20on%20%24(0%2C%201)%24.%0A%20%20%20%20%22%22%22)%0A%20%20%20%20return%0A%0A%0A%40app.cell%0Adef%20_(mo)%3A%0A%20%20%20%20mo.md(r%22%22%22%0A%20%20%20%20%23%20Spring%20Semester%20Homework%201%0A%20%20%20%20%22%22%22)%0A%20%20%20%20return%0A%0A%0A%40app.cell%0Adef%20_(mo)%3A%0A%20%20%20%20mo.md(r%22%22%22%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%20Section%204.4%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%202%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Prove%20that%20%24%7C%20%5Csin(x)%20-%20x%20%7C%20%5Cle%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B6%7D%7C%20x%20%7C%5E3%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Let%20%24g(x)%20%3D%20%5Csin(x)%20-%20x%24%20and%20%24f(x)%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B6%7Dx%5E3%24.%20Easy%20to%20verify%20that%20%24g(0)%20%3D%20f(0)%20%3D%200%24%20and%20that%20%24f(x)%20%5Cne%200%24%20whenever%20%24x%20%5Cne%200%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20By%20Mean%20Value%20Theorem%20we%20have%20for%20%24x%20%3E%200%24%2C%20there%20exists%20%240%20%3C%20c%20%3C%20x%24%20with%20%24%5Cfrac%7B%5Csin(x)%20-%20x%7D%7B%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B6%7Dx%5E3%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7Bg(x)%20-%20g(0)%7D%7Bf(x)%20-%20f(0)%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7Bg'(c)%7D%7Bf'(c)%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B%5Ccos(c)%20-%201%7D%7B%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7Dc%5E2%7D%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Now%20notice%20that%20if%20we%20take%20the%20numerator%20and%20denominator%20as%20the%20new%20%24g%24%20and%20%24f%24%20then%20again%20we%20have%20%24g(0)%20%3D%20f(0)%20%3D%200%24%20and%20%24f(x)%20%5Cne%200%24%20whenever%20%24x%20%5Cne%200%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20So%20we%20can%20apply%20Mean%20Value%20Theorem%20again%2C%20actually%20twice%2C%20to%20get%20that%3A%0A%0A%20%20%20%201.%20There%20exists%20%240%20%3C%20c_1%20%3C%20c%24%20such%20that%20%24%5Cfrac%7B%5Csin(x)%20-%20x%7D%7B%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B6%7Dx%5E3%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B%5Ccos(c)%20-%201%7D%7B%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7Dc%5E2%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B-%5Csin(c_1)%7D%7Bc_1%7D%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%202.%20There%20exists%20%240%20%3C%20c_2%20%3C%20c_1%24%20such%20that%20%24%5Cfrac%7B%5Csin(x)%20-%20x%7D%7B%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B6%7Dx%5E3%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B%5Ccos(c)%20-%201%7D%7B%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7Dc%5E2%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B-%5Csin(c_1)%7D%7Bc_1%7D%20%3D%20-%5Ccos(c_2)%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Similar%20result%20with%20a%20minus%20sign%20can%20be%20reached%20for%20%24x%20%3C%200%24%2C%20thus%20we%20conclude%20that%20%24%5Cfrac%7B%7C%20%5Csin(x)%20-%20x%20%7C%7D%7B%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B6%7D%7C%20x%20%7C%5E3%7D%20%3D%20%7C%20%5Ccos(c_2)%20%7C%20%5Cle%201%24%20for%20all%20%24x%20%5Cne%200%24%20thus%20%24%7C%20%5Csin(x)%20-%20x%20%7C%20%5Cle%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B6%7D%7C%20x%20%7C%5E3%24%20for%20all%20%24x%24%20(at%20%240%24%20it%20is%20clear%20that%20left%20hand%20side%20equals%20right%20hand%20side).%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%204%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**If%20%24f%24%20is%20a%20function%20which%20is%20differentiable%20on%20an%20open%20interval%20%24I%24%20containing%20%240%24%20and%20%24f(0)%20%3D%200%24%2C%20then%20prove%20that%20there%20is%20a%20%24c%24%20between%20%240%24%20and%20%24x%24%20at%20which%20%24f(x)%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7Bf'(c)x%5En%7D%7Bc%5E%7Bn-1%7Dn%7D%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Let%20%24g(x)%20%3D%20x%5En%24%2C%20notice%20that%20%24g(0)%20%3D%200%24%20and%20%24g(x)%20%5Cne%200%24%20whenever%20%24x%20%5Cne%200%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Apply%20Mean%20Value%20Theorem%20we%20have%20that%20for%20%24x%20%3E%200%24%2C%20there%20exists%20%240%20%3C%20c%20%3C%20x%24%20with%20%24%5Cfrac%7Bf(x)%20-%20f(0)%7D%7Bg(x)%20-%20g(0)%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7Bf'(c)%7D%7Bg'(c)%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7Bf'(c)%7D%7Bn%20c%5E%7Bn%20-%201%7D%7D%24%20%24%5Cimplies%20f(x)%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7Bf'(c)x%5En%7D%7Bc%5E%7Bn-1%7Dn%7D%24.%20Same%20result%20holds%20with%20a%20negative%20%24x%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%205%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Use%20the%20previous%20exercise%20and%20induction%20to%20prove%20that%20if%20%24f%24%20is%20%24n%24-times%20differentiable%20on%20an%20open%20interval%20%24I%24%20containing%20%240%24%20and%20if%20the%20%24k%24-th%20derivative%20%24f%5E%7B(k)%7D%24%20of%20%24f%24%20is%20%240%24%20at%20%240%24%20for%20%24k%20%3D%200%2C%201%2C%20%5Cdots%2C%20n-1%24%20then%20there%20is%20a%20%24c%24%20between%20%240%24%20and%20%24x%24%20at%20which%20%24f(x)%20%3D%20f%5E%7B(n)%7D(c)%5Cfrac%7Bx%5En%7D%7Bn!%7D%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20We%20just%20proved%20the%20case%20where%20%24n%20%3D%201%24%2C%20for%20%24n%20%3E%201%24%3A%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Again%20take%20%24g(x)%20%3D%20x%5En%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Apply%20Mean%20Value%20Theorem%20we%20have%20that%20for%20%24x%20%3E%200%24%2C%20there%20exists%20%240%20%3C%20c%20%3C%20x%24%20with%20%24%5Cfrac%7Bf(x)%20-%20f(0)%7D%7Bg(x)%20-%20g(0)%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7Bf'(c)%7D%7Bg'(c)%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7Bf'(c)%7D%7Bn%20c%5E%7Bn%20-%201%7D%7D%24.%20As%20functions%20of%20%24c%24%2C%20%24f'(0)%20%3D%200%24%20and%20%24n0%5E%7Bn-1%7D%20%3D%200%24%2C%20so%20we%20can%20apply%20Mean%20Value%20Theorem%20again%20to%20get%20that%20there%20exists%20%240%20%3C%20c_1%20%3C%20c%24%20with%20%24%5Cfrac%7Bf(x)%20-%20f(0)%7D%7Bg(x)%20-%20g(0)%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7Bf'(c)%7D%7Bg'(c)%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7Bf'(c)%7D%7Bn%20c%5E%7Bn%20-%201%7D%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7Bf''(c_1)%7D%7Bn%20(n%20-%201)c_1%5E%7Bn%20-%202%7D%7D%24.%20By%20assumption%20we%20can%20actually%20continuing%20to%20apply%20Mean%20Value%20Theorem%20to%20get%20%24%5Cfrac%7Bf(x)%20-%20f(0)%7D%7Bg(x)%20-%20g(0)%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7Bf'(c)%7D%7Bg'(c)%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7Bf'(c)%7D%7Bn%20c%5E%7Bn%20-%201%7D%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7Bf''(c_1)%7D%7Bn%20(n%20-%201)c_1%5E%7Bn%20-%202%7D%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7Bf%5E%7B(3)%7D(c_2)%7D%7Bn%20(n%20-%201)%20(n%20-%202)c_2%5E%7Bn%20-%203%7D%7D%20%3D%20%5Cdots%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7Bf%5E%7B(n-1)%7D(c_%7Bn-2%7D)%7D%7Bn%20(n%20-%201)%20%5Cdots%202%20c_%7Bn-2%7D%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7Bf%5E%7B(n)%7D(c_%7Bn-1%7D)%7D%7Bn!c_%7Bn-1%7D%7D%24%20for%20some%20%240%3Cc_%7Bn-1%7D%3C%5Cdots%3Cc_1%3Cc%24.%20Name%20this%20%24c_%7Bn-1%7D%24%20as%20%24c%24%20and%20we%20get%20the%20desired%20result.%20Same%20result%20holds%20for%20negative%20%24x%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%206%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%24%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bx%5Cto%5Cinfty%7D%5Cfrac%7B%5Cln%7Bx%7D%7D%7Bx%5Er%7D%24%20**where%20%24r%20%3E%200%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%24%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bx%20%5Cto%20%5Cinfty%7D%5Cln%7Bx%7D%20%3D%20%5Cinfty%24%20and%20%24%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bx%20%5Cto%20%5Cinfty%7Dx%5Er%20%3D%20%5Cinfty%24%2C%20meanwhile%20%24%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bx%5Cto%5Cinfty%7D%5Cfrac%7B(%5Cln%7Bx%7D)'%7D%7B(x%5Er)'%7D%20%3D%20%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bx%5Cto%5Cinfty%7D%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Brx%5Er%7D%20%3D%200%24%20exists%2C%20thus%20by%20L'H%C3%B4pital's%20Rule%20the%20original%20limit%20is%20also%20%240%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%207%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%24%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bx%20%5Cto%200%7D%20x%5Cln%20x%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Left%20limit%20does%20not%20exist%20as%20%24%5Cln%24%20is%20undefined%20with%20negative%20values.%20For%20the%20right%20limit%2C%20%24%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bx%20%5Cto%200%7D%20x%5Cln%20x%20%3D%20%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bx%20%5Cto%200%7D%20%5Cfrac%7B%5Cln%20x%7D%7B1%2Fx%7D%24.%20Both%20numerator%20and%20denominator%20have%20limit%20infinity.%20Take%20derivatives%20for%20numerator%20and%20denominator%20and%20the%20result%20limit%20%24%3D%20%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bx%20%5Cto%200%7D%20-x%24%20and%20this%20limit%20clearly%20exists%20and%20equals%20%240%24.%20Thus%20by%20L'H%C3%B4pital's%20Rule%20the%20original%20(right)%20limit%20is%20also%20%240%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%208%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%24%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bx%20%5Cto%200%7D%5Cfrac%7B%5Csin(x)-x%7D%7Bx%5E3%7D%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%20This%20limit%20has%20the%20form%20%240%2F0%24%2C%20by%20L'H%C3%B4pital's%20Rule%20%24%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bx%20%5Cto%200%7D%5Cfrac%7B%5Csin(x)-x%7D%7Bx%5E3%7D%20%3D%20%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bx%20%5Cto%200%7D%5Cfrac%7B%5Ccos(x)-1%7D%7B3x%5E2%7D%20%3D%20%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bx%20%5Cto%200%7D%5Cfrac%7B-%5Csin(x)%7D%7B6x%7D%20%3D%20%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bx%20%5Cto%200%7D%5Cfrac%7B-%5Ccos(x)%7D%7B6%7D%20%3D%20-1%2F6%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%209%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%24%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bx%5Cto%200%7D%5Cfrac%7B1%2B%5Ccos(x)%7D%7Bx%5E2%7D%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%20This%20limit%20has%20the%20form%20%24c%2F0%24%20and%20clearly%20has%20the%20result%20%24%3D%20%5Cinfty%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20(Maybe%20the%20author%20meant%20%241%20-%20%5Ccos(x)%24%20here%3F%20Then%20by%20L'H%C3%B4pital's%20Rule%20%24%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bx%5Cto%200%7D%5Cfrac%7B1-%5Ccos(x)%7D%7Bx%5E2%7D%20%3D%20%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bx%5Cto%200%7D%5Cfrac%7B%5Csin(x)%7D%7B2x%7D%20%3D%20%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bx%5Cto%200%7D%5Cfrac%7B%5Ccos(x)%7D%7B2%7D%20%3D%201%2F2%24.)%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%2010%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%24%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bx%5Cto%200%7Dx%5Ex%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%20The%20left%20side%20limit%20does%20not%20exist%20as%20for%20negative%20rational%20%24x%24%20with%20odd%20denominator%20%24x%5Ex%24%20is%20undefined%20on%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%24.%20For%20the%20right%20limit%20%24%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bx%5Cto%200%2B%7Dx%5Ex%20%3D%20%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bx%5Cto%200%2B%7D%5Cexp%7B%5Cln%7Bx%5Ex%7D%7D%20%3D%20%5Cexp%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bx%5Cto%200%2B%7Dx%5Cln%7Bx%7D%20%3D%20%5Cexp%7B0%7D%20%3D%201%24%20by%20previous%20exercise.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%2012%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%24%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bx%20%5Cto%20%5Cinfty%7D(%5Csqrt%7Bx%2B1%7D%20-%20%5Csqrt%7Bx%7D)%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Claim%20the%20limit%20is%20%240%24%3A%0A%0A%20%20%20%20For%20any%20%24%5Cvarepsilon0%24%2C%20we%20have%20%24%7C%20%5Csqrt%7Bx%2B1%7D%20-%20%5Csqrt%7Bx%7D%20%7C%20%3D%20%7C%20(%5Csqrt%20%7Bx%2B1%7D%20-%20%5Csqrt%7Bx%7D)%20%5Cfrac%7B%5Csqrt%7Bx%2B1%7D%20%2B%20%5Csqrt%7Bx%7D%7D%7B%5Csqrt%7Bx%2B1%7D%20%2B%20%5Csqrt%7Bx%7D%7D%20%7C%20%3D%20%7C%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B%5Csqrt%7Bx%2B1%7D%20%2B%20%5Csqrt%7Bx%7D%7D%20%7C%20%3C%20%7C%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%5Csqrt%7Bx%2B1%7D%7D%20%7C%20%3C%20%5Cvarepsilon%24%20whenever%20%24m%20%3C%20x%24%20for%20larger%20enough%20%24m%24.%20By%20definition%20the%20original%20limit%20is%20%240%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%2014%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Let%20%24f%24%20be%20a%20differentiable%20function%20on%20%24(0%2C%20%5Cinfty)%24.%20Prove%20that%20if%20%24%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bx%5Cto%5Cinfty%7Df(x)%20%3D%20%5Cinfty%24%20and%20%24%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bx%5Cto%20%5Cinfty%7Df'(x)%20%3D%20L%24%20then%20%24%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bx%5Cto%5Cinfty%7D%5Cfrac%7Be%5E%7Bf(x)%7D%7D%7B%5Cint_0%5Ex%20e%5E%7Bf(t)%7Ddt%7D%20%3D%20L%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Since%20%24%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bx%5Cto%5Cinfty%7Df(x)%20%3D%20%5Cinfty%24%2C%20we%20have%20%24%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bx%5Cto%5Cinfty%7De%5E%7Bf(x)%7D%20%3D%20%5Cinfty%24%2C%20and%20observe%20that%20the%20area%20below%20%24e%5E%7Bf(t)%7D%24%20from%20%240%24%20to%20%24x%24%20goes%20to%20infinity%20as%20%24x%24%20goes%20(I%20cannot%20see%20a%20way%20to%20explicitly%20write%20it%E2%80%A6).%20If%20we%20take%20derivatives%20for%20both%20numerator%20and%20denominator%20we%20have%20%24(e%5E%7Bf(x)%7D)'%20%3D%20f'(x)e%5E%7Bf(x)%7D%24%20and%20%24(%5Cint_0%5Ex%20e%5E%7Bf(t)%7Ddt)'%20%3D%20e%5E%7Bf(x)%7D%24%20by%20Fundamental%20Theorem%20of%20Calculus.%20It%20is%20easy%20to%20see%20that%20now%20we%20can%20apply%20L'H%C3%B4pital's%20Rule%20and%20thus%20the%20original%20limit%20equals%20%24%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bx%5Cto%20%5Cinfty%7Df'(x)%20%3D%20L%24.%0A%20%20%20%20%22%22%22)%0A%20%20%20%20return%0A%0A%0A%40app.cell%0Adef%20_(mo)%3A%0A%20%20%20%20mo.md(r%22%22%22%0A%20%20%20%20%23%20Spring%20Semester%20Homework%202%0A%20%20%20%20%22%22%22)%0A%20%20%20%20return%0A%0A%0A%40app.cell%0Adef%20_(mo)%3A%0A%20%20%20%20mo.md(r%22%22%22%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%20Section%205.1%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%202%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Prove%20that%20%24%5Cint_0%5E1xdx%24%20exists%20by%20computing%20%24U(f%2CP_n)%24%20and%20%24L(f%2CP_n)%24%20for%20the%20function%20%24f(x)%20%3D%20x%24%20and%20a%20partition%20%24P_n%24%20of%20%24%5B0%2C1%5D%24%20into%20%24n%24%20equal%20sub-intervals.%20Then%20show%20that%20condition%205.1.7%20of%20Theorem%205.1.8%20is%20satisfied.%20Calculate%20the%20integral%20by%20taking%20the%20limit%20of%20the%20upper%20sums**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%24f(x)%20%3D%20x%24%20is%20a%20simple%20non-decreasing%20function%20so%20%24m%24%20and%20%24M%24%20in%20the%20calculation%20of%20%24L%24%20and%20%24U%24%20are%20easy.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20We%20have%20(for%20a%20certain%20%24n%24)%3A%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%24U(f%2CP_n)%20%3D%20%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bi%3D0%7D%5E%7Bn-1%7D%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bn%7D%5Cfrac%7Bi%2B1%7D%7Bn%7D%24%20and%20%24L(f%2CP_n)%20%3D%20%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bi%3D0%7D%5E%7Bn-1%7D%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bn%7D%5Cfrac%7Bi%7D%7Bn%7D%24.%20Thus%20%24U%20-%20L%20%3D%20%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bi%3D0%7D%5E%7Bn-1%7D%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bn%5E2%7D%3C%201%2Fn%24%2C%20and%20clearly%20for%20any%20%24%5Cvarepsilon%24%20one%20can%20choose%20large%20enough%20%24n%24%20so%20that%20%24U-L%3C1%2Fn%20%3C%20%5Cvarepsilon%24%2C%20thus%20the%20Riemann%20integral%20exists.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20With%20exactly%20the%20same%20argument%2C%20with%20the%20same%20sequence%20of%20partition%2C%20we%20have%20%24%5Clim%5Climits(U-L)%20%3D%20%5Clim%5Climits%7B1%2Fn%7D%20%3D0%24%2C%20thus%20the%205.1.7%20condition%20is%20satisfied.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20And%20we%20can%20use%20the%20summation%20formula%20to%20calculate%20%24%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bn%5Cto%20%5Cinfty%7DU(f%2C%20P_n)%24%20%24%3D%20%5Clim%5Climits%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bn%5E2%7D%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bi%3D0%7D%5E%7Bn-1%7Di%2B1%24%20%24%3D%20%5Clim%5Climits%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bn%5E2%7D%5Cfrac%7B(1%2Bn)n%7D%7B2%7D%24%20which%20is%20clearly%20%241%2F2%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%203%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Prove%20by%20induction%20that%20%24%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bk%3D1%7D%5Enk%5E2%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7Bn(n%2B1)(2n%2B1)%7D%7B6%7D%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Statement%20is%20clearly%20true%20for%20%24n%20%3D%201%24.%20If%20it%20is%20true%20for%20%24n%24%2C%20then%20%24%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bk%3D1%7D%5E%7Bn%2B1%7Dk%5E2%20%3D%20%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bk%3D1%7D%5E%7Bn%7Dk%5E2%20%2B%20(n%2B1)%5E2%24%20%24%3D%20%5Cfrac%7Bn(n%2B1)(2n%2B1)%7D%7B6%7D%20%2B%20(n%2B1)%5E2%24%20%24%3D%20%5Cfrac%7Bn(n%2B1)(2n%2B1)%20%2B%206(n%2B1)%5E2%7D%7B6%7D%24.%20Now%20it%20is%20easy%20to%20verify%20that%20%24n(n%2B1)(2n%2B1)%20%2B%206(n%2B1)%5E2%24%20%24%3D%202n%5E3%20%2B%209n%5E2%20%2B%2013n%2B6%24%20%24%3D%20(n%2B1)(n%2B2)(2n%2B3)%24%2C%20thus%20the%20statement%20holds%20for%20%24n%2B1%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%204%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Prove%20that%20%24%5Cint_0%5Eax%5E2dx%20%3D%20a%5E3%2F3%24%20by%20expressing%20this%20integral%20as%20a%20limit%20of%20Riemann%20sums%20and%20find%20the%20limit**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%24%5Cint_0%5Eax%5E2dx%20%3D%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bn%5Cto%20%5Cinfty%7D%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bm%3D1%7D%5E%7Bn%7D%5Cfrac%7Ba%7D%7Bn%7D(%5Cfrac%7Bma%7D%7Bn%7D)%5E2%20%3D%20%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bn%5Cto%20%5Cinfty%7D%5Cfrac%7Ba%5E3%7D%7Bn%5E3%7D%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bm%3D1%7D%5E%7Bn%7Dm%5E2%24%2C%20now%20by%20above%20exercise%20we%20have%20%24%3D%20%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bn%5Cto%20%5Cinfty%7D%5Cfrac%7Ba%5E3%7D%7Bn%5E3%7D%5Cfrac%7Bn(n%2B1)(2n%2B1)%7D%7B6%7D%24%2C%20it%20clearly%20has%20the%20limit%20%24a%5E3%2F3%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%205%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Let%20%24f%24%20be%20the%20function%20on%20%24%5B0%2C1%5D%24%20which%20is%20%240%24%20at%20every%20rational%20number%20and%20is%20%241%24%20at%20every%20irrational%20number.%20Is%20this%20function%20integrable%20on%20%24%5B0%2C1%5D%24%3F%20Prove%20that%20your%20answer%20is%20correct%20by%20using%20the%20definition%20of%20the%20integral**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20No.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20A%20fact%20from%20last%20semester%20that%20we%20need%3A%20any%20interval%20on%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%24%20contains%20both%20rational%20and%20irrational%20numbers.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20This%20means%20that%20the%20lower%20sum%20%24L%20%3D%20%5Csum%20m_i(x_%7Bi%2B1%7D%20-%20x_i)%24%20is%20always%20%240%24%20because%20each%20%24m_i%24%20is%20zero%2C%20while%20that%20the%20upper%20sum%20is%20always%20%241%24%2C%20whichever%20partition%20we%20take.%20Thus%20they%20never%20equal%20and%20%24f%24%20is%20not%20integrable.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%208%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Suppose%20%24m%24%20and%20%24M%24%20are%20lower%20and%20upper%20bounds%20for%20%24f%24%20on%20%24%5Ba%2C%20b%5D%24%3B%20that%20is%2C%20%24m%20%5Cle%20f(x)%20%5Cle%20M%2C%20%5Cforall%20x%20%5Cin%20%5Ba%2C%20b%5D%24.%20Prove%20that%20%24m(b-a)%24%20%24%5Cle%20%5Cunderline%7B%5Cint_a%5Eb%7Df(x)dx%24%20%24%5Cle%20%5Coverline%7B%5Cint_a%5Eb%7Df(x)dx%24%20%24%5Cle%20M(b-a)%24.%20What%20conclusion%20about%20%24%5Cint_a%5Ebf(x)dx%24%20do%20you%20draw%20from%20this%20if%20the%20integral%20exists**%3F%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%24%5Coverline%7B%5Cint_a%5Eb%7Df(x)dx%24%20%24%5Coverset%7B%5Ctext%7Bdef%7D%7D%7B%3D%7D%20%5Cinf%7BU(f%2CP)%7D%5Cle%20U(f%2CP)%24%20%24%5Coverset%7B%5Ctext%7Bdef%7D%7D%7B%3D%7D%5Csum%5Climits_iM_i(x_%7Bi%2B1%7D-x_%7Bi-1%7D)%24%20%24%5Cle%5Csum%5Climits_iM(x_%7Bi%2B1%7D-x_%7Bi-1%7D)%3DM(b-a)%24%2C%20similar%20for%20the%20lower%20side.%20Also%20naturally%20we%20have%20%24L(f%2CP)%20%5Cle%20U(f%2CP)%24%20for%20any%20%24P%24%20and%20thus%20%24%5Cunderline%7B%5Cint_a%5Eb%7Df(x)dx%20%5Cle%20%5Coverline%7B%5Cint_a%5Eb%7Df(x)dx%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Join%20everything%20together%20we%20have%20%24m(b-a)%24%20%24%5Cle%20%5Cunderline%7B%5Cint_a%5Eb%7Df(x)dx%24%20%24%5Cle%20%5Coverline%7B%5Cint_a%5Eb%7Df(x)dx%24%20%24%5Cle%20M(b-a)%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20We%20can%20conclude%20that%20%24m(b-a)%24%20%24%5Cle%20%5Cint_a%5Ebf(x)dx%24%20%24%5Cle%20M(b-a)%24%20if%20it%20exists%2C%20because%20it%20is%20defined%20to%20be%20equal%20to%20the%20upper%20and%20lower%20integral%2C%20if%20it%20exists.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%20Section%205.2%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%206%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Prove%20that%20%241%20%5Cle%20%5Cint_%7B-1%7D%5E1%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B1%2Bx%5E%7B2n%7D%7Ddx%20%5Cle%202%24%20for%20all%20%24n%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BN%7D%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20On%20%24%5B-1%2C1%5D%24%2C%20%24%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B1%2Bx%5E%7B2n%7D%7D%24%20is%20clearly%20bounded%20above%20by%20%24M%3D%201%24%20(%24x%5E%7B2n%7D%24%20always%20positive)%20and%20bounded%20below%20by%20%24m%20%3D%201%2F2%24%20(%24x%5E%7B2n%7D%24%20always%20less%20than%20%241%24).%20By%20above%20exercise%20the%20integral%20is%20bounded%20by%20%24m(b-a)%20%3D%201%24%20and%20%24M(b-a)%20%3D%202%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%209%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Prove%20that%20if%20%24f%24%20is%20integrable%20on%20%24%5Ba%2Cb%5D%24%2C%20so%20is%20%24f%5E2%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Let%20%24P_n%24%20be%20Archimedean%20over%20%24f%24%2C%20then%20%24%5Clim%5Climits%7BU(f%5E2%2CP_n)%20-%20L(f%5E2%2CP_n)%7D%20%3D%20%5Clim%5Climits%7B%5Csum%5Climits_i(M_i%5E%7Bf%5E2%7D-m_i%5E%7Bf%5E2%7D)(x_%7Bi%2B1%7D-x_i)%7D%24%20%24%3D%20%5Clim%5Climits%7B%5Csum%5Climits_i(M_i%5E2-m_i%5E2)(x_%7Bi%2B1%7D-x_i)%7D%24%20%24%3D%20%5Clim%5Climits%7B%5Csum%5Climits_i(M_i%20%2B%20m_i)(M_i-m_i)(x_%7Bi%2B1%7D-x_i)%7D%24%20(%24*%24)%2C%20let%20%24M%5E%7B*%7D%24%20be%20%24%5Csup%5Climits%7Bf(x)%7D%20%2B%201%24%2C%20then%20(%24*%24)%20%24%3C%202M%5E%7B*%7D%20%5Clim%5Climits%7B%5Csum%5Climits_i(M_i%20-%20m_i)(x_%7Bi%2B1%7D-x_i)%7D%24%2C%20but%20since%20%242M%5E%7B*%7D%24%20is%20fixed%2C%20this%20value%20goes%20to%20%240%24%20as%20%24n%20%5Cto%20%5Cinfty%24%2C%20i.e.%20%24%5Clim%5Climits%7BU(f%5E2%2CP_n)%20-%20L(f%5E2%2CP_n)%7D%20%3D%200%24%2C%20thus%20%24f%5E2%24%20is%20integrable.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%2010%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Prove%20that%20if%20%24f%24%20and%20%24g%24%20are%20integrable%20on%20%24%5Ba%2Cb%5D%24%2C%20so%20is%20%24fg%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Assuming%20we%20know%20that%20if%20%24f%24%20and%20%24g%24%20are%20integrable%20on%20%24%5Ba%2Cb%5D%24%2C%20so%20are%20%24f%2Bg%24%20(and%20%24f-g%24)%2C%20which%20is%20proved%20during%20class%2C%20and%20%24f%5E2%24%2C%20which%20is%20proved%20above.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Now%20%24fg%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D((f%2Bg)%5E2%20-%20f%5E2%20-%20g%5E2)%24%2C%20by%20above%20statement%2C%20%24fg%24%20is%20integrable%20(easy%20to%20see%20%24cf%24%20is%20integrable%20if%20%24f%24%20is%2C%20because%20clearly%20%24c%5Csum%5Climits(M_i-m_i)%5Cto%200%24).%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%20Section%205.3%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%204%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Find%20%24%5Cfrac%7Bd%7D%7Bdx%7D%5Cint_%7B1%2Fx%7D%5Exe%5E%7B-t%5E2%7Ddt%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%24e%5E%7B-t%5E2%7D%24%20is%20clearly%20continuous%20and%20thus%20Riemann%20integrable.%20Thus%20by%20Theorem%205.3.3%20let%20%24F(x)%20%3D%20%5Cint_%7B1%2Fx%7D%5Exe%5E%7B-t%5E2%7Ddt%20%3D%20%5Cint_%7B0%7D%5Exe%5E%7B-t%5E2%7Ddt%20-%20%5Cint_0%5E%7B1%2Fx%7De%5E%7B-t%5E2%7Ddt%24%2C%20**the%20derivative%20of%20the**%20first%20part%20simply%20equals%20%24e%5E%7B-x%5E2%7D%24%20and%20for%20the%20second%20part%20we%20differentiate%20%24F(1%2Fx)%24%20which%20is%20%24-x%5E%7B-2%7DF'(1%2Fx)%3D-x%5E%7B-2%7De%5E%7B-1%2Fx%5E2%7D%24.%20Together%20we%20have%20%24%5Cfrac%7Bd%7D%7Bdx%7D%5Cint_%7B1%2Fx%7D%5Exe%5E%7B-t%5E2%7Ddt%20%3D%20e%5E%7B-x%5E2%7D%20%2B%20x%5E%7B-2%7De%5E%7B-1%2Fx%5E2%7D%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%205%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**If%20%24f(x)%20%3D%20-1%2Fx%24%20then%20%24f'(x)%20%3D%201%2Fx%5E2%24.%20Thus%2C%20Theorem%205.3.1%20seems%20to%20imply%20that%20%24%5Cint_%7B-1%7D%5E11%2Fx%5E2dx%20%3D%20f(1)%20-%20f(-1)%20%3D%20-1-1%20%3D%20-2%24.%20However%2C%20%241%2Fx%5E2%24%20is%20a%20positive%20function%2C%20and%20so%20its%20integral%20over%20%24%5B-1%2C%201%5D%24%20should%20be%20positive%2C%20what%20is%20wrong**%3F%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%24f'%24%20is%20not%20even%20integrable%20(bounded)%20on%20%24%5B-1%2C%201%5D%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%209%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Prove%20that%20if%20%24f%24%20is%20integrable%20on%20%24%5Ba%2Cb%5D%24%20and%20%24c%20%5Cin%20%5Ba%2C%20b%5D%24%20then%20changing%20the%20value%20of%20%24f%24%20at%20%24c%24%20does%20not%20change%20the%20fact%20that%20%24f%24%20is%20integrable%20or%20the%20value%20of%20its%20integral%20on%20%24%5Ba%2C%20b%5D%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Suppose%20%24f(c)%20%3D%20y%24%20and%20say%20the%20new%20%24%5Ctilde%7Bf(c)%7D%20%3D%20z%24.%20Let%20%24m%24%20denote%20the%20difference%20%24m%20%3D%20%7Cz%20-%20y%7C%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Say%20%24P_n%24%20is%20Archimedean%20for%20%24f%24%20and%20fix%20any%20%24%5Cvarepsilon%20%3E%200%24%3A%20add%20%24%5Clbrace%20c%20-%20%5Cvarepsilon%2F2m%2C%20c%20%2B%20%5Cvarepsilon%2F2m%5Crbrace%24%20into%20each%20partition%20%24P_i%24's%20and%20the%20new%20sequence%20of%20partitions%20(let's%20call%20it%20%24%5Ctilde%7BP_n%7D%24)%20is%20still%20Archimedean%20for%20%24f%24%20by%20the%20Refinement%20Lemma.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20We%20have%3A%20%24%7C%20U(%5Ctilde%7Bf%7D%2C%20%5Ctilde%7BP_n%7D)%20-%20L(%5Ctilde%7Bf%7D%2C%20%5Ctilde%7BP_n%7D)%20%7C%24%20%24%3D%20%7C%20U(%5Ctilde%7Bf%7D%2C%20%5Ctilde%7BP_n%7D)%20%2BU(f%2C%5Ctilde%7BP_n%7D)%20-U(f%2C%5Ctilde%7BP_n%7D)%20%2B%20L(f%2C%5Ctilde%7BP_n%7D)%20-%20L(f%2C%5Ctilde%7BP_n%7D)-%20L(%5Ctilde%7Bf%7D%2C%20%5Ctilde%7BP_n%7D)%20%7C%24%20%24%5Cle%20%7C%20U(%5Ctilde%7Bf%7D%2C%20%5Ctilde%7BP_n%7D)%20-U(f%2C%5Ctilde%7BP_n%7D)%7C%24%20%24%2B%7C%20U(f%2C%5Ctilde%7BP_n%7D)%20-%20L(f%2C%5Ctilde%7BP_n%7D)%7C%24%20%24%2B%7C%20L(f%2C%5Ctilde%7BP_n%7D)-%20L(%5Ctilde%7Bf%7D%2C%20%5Ctilde%7BP_n%7D)%20%7C%24%20(%24*%24).%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Now%3A%0A%0A%20%20%20%201.%20The%20first%20term%20is%20less%20than%20or%20equal%20to%20%24%5Cvarepsilon%24%3A%20the%20only%20difference%20of%20upper%20sum%20of%20%24f%24%20and%20%24%5Ctilde%7Bf%7D%24%20is%20at%20%24c%24%20and%20the%20difference%20is%20%24m%24%2C%20but%20the%20'rectangle'%20there%20has%20width%20%24%5Cvarepsilon%2Fm%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%202.%20The%20second%20term%20is%20less%20than%20%24%5Cvarepsilon%24%2C%20by%20the%20integrability%20of%20%24f%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%203.%20The%20third%20term%20is%20less%20than%20or%20equal%20to%20%24%5Cvarepsilon%24%20for%20the%20same%20reason%20with%20the%20first%20term.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20So%20(%24*%24)%20%24%3C%203%5Cvarepsilon%20%5Cto%200%24%20so%20%24%5Ctilde%7Bf%7D%24%20is%20integrable.%20Also%20by%20above%20we%20have%20%24%7C%20U(%5Ctilde%7Bf%7D%2C%20%5Ctilde%7BP_n%7D)%20-U(f%2C%5Ctilde%7BP_n%7D)%7C%20%5Cto%200%24%20so%20the%20integral%20does%20not%20change%20value.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%2010%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**The%20function%20%24f(x)%20%3D%20x%2F%7C%20x%20%7C%24%20has%20derivative%20%240%24%20everywhere%20but%20at%20%24x%20%3D%200%24.%20Its%20derivative%20%24f'(x)%20%3D%200%24%20is%20integrable%20on%20%24%5B-1%2C%201%5D%24%20and%20has%20integral%20%240%24.%20However%20%24f(1)-f(-1)%20%3D%202%24.%20This%20seems%20to%20contradict%20Theorem%205.3.1.%20Explain%20why%20it%20does%20not**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Theorem%205.3.1%20requires%20%24f%24%20to%20be%20continuous%20on%20%24%5Ba%2Cb%5D%24%20and%20differentiable%20on%20%24(a%2Cb)%24%2C%20neither%20conditions%20is%20met%2C%20so%20I%20do%20not%20see%20why%20we%20can%20even%20apply%20the%20theorem%20here.%0A%20%20%20%20%22%22%22)%0A%20%20%20%20return%0A%0A%0A%40app.cell%0Adef%20_(mo)%3A%0A%20%20%20%20mo.md(r%22%22%22%0A%20%20%20%20%23%20Spring%20Semester%20Homework%203%0A%20%20%20%20%22%22%22)%0A%20%20%20%20return%0A%0A%0A%40app.cell%0Adef%20_(mo)%3A%0A%20%20%20%20mo.md(r%22%22%22%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%20Section%205.4%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%205%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Using%20Definition%205.4.8%20and%20the%20properties%20of%20%24%5Cexp%24%20prove%20the%20laws%20of%20exponents%20%24a%5E%7Bx%2By%7D%20%3D%20a%5Exa%5Ey%24%20and%20%24a%5E%7Bxy%7D%20%3D%20(a%5Ex)%5Ey%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%24a%5E%7Bx%2By%7D%20%5Coverset%7B%5Ctext%7Bdef%7D%7D%7B%3D%7D%20%5Cexp%7B((x%2By)%5Cln%7Ba%7D)%7D%20%3D%20%5Cexp%7B(x%5Cln%7Ba%7D%20%2B%20y%5Cln%7Ba%7D)%7D%24%20%24%3D%5Cexp%7B(x%5Cln%7Ba%7D)%7D%5Cexp%7B(y%5Cln%7Ba%7D)%7D%20%5Coverset%7B%5Ctext%7Bdef%7D%7D%7B%3D%7D%20a%5Exa%5Ey%24%3B%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%24a%5E%7Bxy%7D%20%5Coverset%7B%5Ctext%7Bdef%7D%7D%7B%3D%7D%20%5Cexp%7B(xy%5Cln(a))%7D%20%3D%20%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bn%20%5Cto%20%5Cinfty%7D%5Cexp%7B(xy_n%5Cln(a))%7D%20%3D%24%2C%20with%20rational%20%24y_n%20%5Cto%20y%24%2C%20by%20continuity%20of%20%24%5Cexp%24%2C%20%24%3D%20%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bn%20%5Cto%20%5Cinfty%7D(%5Cexp%7B(x%5Cln(a))%7D)%5E%7By_n%7D%24%20%24%5Coverset%7B%5Ctext%7Bdef%7D%7D%7B%3D%7D%20%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bn%20%5Cto%20%5Cinfty%7D%20(a%5Ex)%5E%7By_n%7D%20%3D%20(a%5Ex)%5Ey%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%206%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Compute%20the%20derivative%20of%20%24a%5Ex%24%20for%20each%20%24a%20%3E%200%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%24%5Cfrac%7Bda(x)%7D%7Bdx%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7Bd(%5Cexp%7B(x%5Cln(a)%7D))%7D%7Bdx%7D%24%20by%20chain%20rule%20%24%3D%5Cln(a)%20%5Cexp%7B(x%20%5Cln%7Ba%7D)%7D%20%3D%20%5Cln%7Ba%7D%20%5Ccdot%20a%5Ex%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%208%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**If%20%24f%2C%20g%24%20are%20integrable%20then%20%24fg%24%20is%20integrable**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%24f%2C%20g%24%20are%20integrable%20then%20the%20sets%20of%20discontinuity%20%24D_f%24%20and%20%24D_g%24%20are%20negligible%2C%20claim%20that%20%24D_%7Bfg%7D%20%5Csubseteq%20D_f%20%5Ccup%20D_g%24%3A%20suppose%20not%2C%20then%20there%20exists%20a%20point%20%24p%24%20with%20%24fg%24%20not%20continuous%20at%20%24p%24%20but%20%24f%24%20and%20%24g%24%20are%20continuous%20at%20%24p%24%2C%20this%20cannot%20be%20true.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Now%20another%20claim%2C%20finite%20union%20of%20negligible%20sets%20are%20negligible%3A%20say%20we%20have%20two%20negligible%20sets%20%24A%2C%20B%24.%20By%20definition%20we%20can%20choose%20the%20coverings%20%24%5Ccup%20I_%7BA_i%7D%24%20and%20%24%5Ccup%20I_%7BB_i%7D%24%20with%20each%20sum%20of%20volume%20less%20than%20%24%5Cvarepsilon%2F2%24%2C%20thus%20their%20union's%20sum%20of%20volume%20is%20less%20than%20%24%5Cvarepsilon%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Thus%20%24D_f%20%5Ccup%20D_g%24%20and%20thus%20%24D_%7Bfg%7D%24%20is%20negligible%2C%20and%20thus%20%24fg%24%20is%20integrable.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%20Section%206.1%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%204%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Determine%20whether%20the%20series%20converges%3A%20%24%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bk%20%3D%201%7D%5E%7B%5Cinfty%7D%20%5Cfrac%7Bk%5E2-3k%2B1%7D%7B3k%5E2%2Bk-2%7D%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%20The%20series%20diverges%20as%20%24%5Cfrac%7Bk%5E2-3k%2B1%7D%7B3k%5E2%2Bk-2%7D%20%5Cto%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B3%7D%20%5Cne%200%24%20when%20taking%20%24k%20%5Cto%20%5Cinfty%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%206%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Determine%20whether%20the%20series%20converges%3A%20%24%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bk%3D1%7D%5E%7B%5Cinfty%7D%5Cfrac%7Bk%7D%7Bk%5E2-k%2B2%7D%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Easy%20to%20verify%20that%20%24k%5E2-k%2B2%20%5Cle%202k%5E2%24%20for%20all%20natural%20%24k%24%2C%20thus%20%24%5Cfrac%7Bk%7D%7Bk%5E2-k%2B2%7D%20%5Cge%20%5Cfrac%7Bk%7D%7B2k%5E2%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2k%7D%24%2C%20by%20comparison%20test%2C%20if%20%24%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bk%3D1%7D%5E%7B%5Cinfty%7D%5Cfrac%7Bk%7D%7Bk%5E2-k%2B2%7D%24%20converges%20then%20so%20does%20%24%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bk%3D1%7D%5E%7B%5Cinfty%7D%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bk%7D%24%2C%20which%20is%20not%20true%2C%20so%20%24%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bk%3D1%7D%5E%7B%5Cinfty%7D%5Cfrac%7Bk%7D%7Bk%5E2-k%2B2%7D%24%20does%20not%20converge.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%208%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Determine%20whether%20the%20series%20converges%20absolutely%3A%20%24%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bk%20%3D%201%7D%5E%7B%5Cinfty%7D%5Cfrac%7B-1%5E%7Bk%2B1%7D%7D%7B%5Csqrt%7Bk%7D%7D%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Taking%20term-wise%20absolute%20value%20the%20series%20becomes%20%24%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bk%3D1%7D%5E%7B%5Cinfty%7D%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B%5Csqrt%7Bk%7D%7D%20%3D%20%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bk%3D1%7D%5E%7B%5Cinfty%7D%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bk%5E%7B1%2F2%7D%7D%24%2C%20which%20diverges%20as%20%241%2F2%20%3C%201%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%2011%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Prove%20the%20following%20weak%20version%20of%20the%20comparison%20test%20using%20Theorem%206.1.8%3A%20If%20%24a_1%2Ba_2%2B%5Cdots%20%2B%20a_k%2B%5Cdots%24%20and%20%24b_1%2B%5Cdots%2Bb_k%2B%5Cdots%24%20are%20series%20of%20non-negative%20terms%20with%20%24a_k%20%5Cle%20b_k%24%20for%20all%20%24k%24%2C%20then%20if%20%24b_1%2B%5Cdots%2Bb_k%2B%5Cdots%24%20converges%2C%20so%20does%20%24a_1%2B%5Cdots%2Ba_k%2B%5Cdots%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20By%20Theorem%206.1.8%2C%20if%20%24%5Csum%20b_k%24%20converges%20then%20%24%5Clbrace%20s_%7Bb_n%7D%20%5Crbrace%24%20is%20bounded%20above.%20Say%20%24M%24%20is%20a%20bound%2C%20thus%20%24s_%7Bb_n%7D%20%3D%20b_1%20%2B%20%5Cdots%20%2B%20b_n%20%5Cle%20M%24%20for%20any%20%24n%24%2C%20but%20then%20%24a_1%20%2B%20%5Cdots%20%2B%20a_n%20%5Cle%20b_1%20%2B%20%5Cdots%20%2B%20b_n%20%5Cle%20M%24%2C%20thus%20%24M%24%20is%20also%20a%20bound%20for%20%24%5Clbrace%20s_%7Ba_n%7D%20%5Crbrace%24%2C%20since%20Theorem%206.1.8%20is%20an%20if%20and%20only%20if%20statement%2C%20this%20implies%20that%20%24%5Csum%20a_k%24%20converges.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%2012%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Consider%20the%20decimal%20expansion%20%24.d_1d_2%5Cdots%24%20of%20a%20real%20number%20between%20%240%24%20and%20%241%24%2C%20where%20%24d_k%24%20is%20a%20sequence%20of%20integers%20between%20%240%24%20and%20%249%24.%20This%20decimal%20expansion%20represents%20the%20sum%20of%20a%20certain%20infinite%20series%2C%20what%20series%20is%20it%20and%20why%20does%20it%20converge**%3F%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%24.d_1d_2%5Cdots%24%20can%20be%20written%20as%20%240.d_1%20%2B%200.0d_2%2B%20%5Cdots%20%3D%20d_110%5E%7B-1%7D%2Bd_210%5E%7B-2%7D%2B%5Cdots%24%20%24%3D%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bn%3D1%7D%5E%7B%5Cinfty%7D%5Cfrac%7Bd_n%7D%7B10%5En%7D%24%2C%20this%20is%20a%20power%20series.%20Now%20since%20%24d_k%24%20is%20between%20%240%24%20and%20%249%24%20we%20have%20%24%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bn%3D1%7D%5E%7B%5Cinfty%7D%5Cfrac%7Bd_n%7D%7B10%5En%7D%20%5Cle%20%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bn%3D1%7D%5E%7B%5Cinfty%7D%5Cfrac%7B9%7D%7B10%5En%7D%20%3D%209%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bn%3D1%7D%5E%7B%5Cinfty%7D0.1%5En%24%2C%20which%20is%20a%20convergent%20geometric%20series%20(to%20%241%24)%2C%20by%20comparison%20test%20the%20original%20decimal%20expansion%20is%20convergent.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%2013%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Show%20that%20every%20real%20number%20in%20the%20interval%20%24%5B0%2C1%5D%24%20has%20a%20decimal%20expansion%20as%20described%20in%20the%20previous%20exercise**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Let's%20call%20the%20real%20number%20%24r%24%2C%20say%20%24r%20%5Cne%201%24%20for%20the%20moment.%20Split%20%24%5B0%2C1)%24%20to%20ten%20intervals%20%24%5B0%2C%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B10%7D)%2C%5B%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B10%7D%2C%20%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7B10%7D)%2C%20%5Cdots%2C%20%5B%5Cfrac%7B9%7D%7B10%7D%2C%201)%24.%20Clearly%20%24r%24%20lies%20inside%20exactly%20one%20of%20the%20interval%2C%20say%20%24r%20%5Cin%20%5B%5Cfrac%7Bk%7D%7B10%7D%2C%20%5Cfrac%7Bk%2B1%7D%7B10%7D)%24%2C%20name%20%24d_1%20%3D%20k%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Similarly%2C%20split%20%24%5B%5Cfrac%7Bd_1%7D%7B10%7D%2C%20%5Cfrac%7Bd_1%2B1%7D%7B10%7D)%24%20to%20ten%20intervals%20%24%5B%5Cfrac%7Bd_1%7D%7B10%7D%2C%20%5Cfrac%7Bd_1%7D%7B10%7D%2B%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B100%7D)%2C%20%5Cdots%2C%20%5B%5Cfrac%7Bd_1%7D%7B10%7D%2B%5Cfrac%7B9%7D%7B100%7D%2C%20%5Cfrac%7Bd_1%2B1%7D%7B10%7D)%24%2C%20this%20induces%20unique%20%24d_2%24.%20Repeat%20this%20process%20to%20get%20unique%20%24%5Clbrace%20d_k%20%5Crbrace%24%2C%20then%20by%20construction%20we%20have%20%24.d_1d_2%5Cdots%20%3D%20%5Clim%5Climits%20%5Cfrac%7Bd_1%7D%7B10%7D%2B%5Cfrac%7Bd_2%7D%7B100%7D%2B%5Cdots%20%3D%20r%24%20(because%20the%20error%20term%20is%20%24%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B10%5Ek%7D%20%5Cto%200%24)%20so%20%24.d_1d_2d_3%5Cdots%24%20works%20as%20the%20decimal%20expansion%20of%20%24r%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Now%2C%20if%20%24r%20%3D%201%24%2C%20if%20we%20allow%20%241%20%3D%201.000%5Cdots%24%20then%20we%20are%20done.%20Otherwise%2C%20claim%20that%20%24r%20%3D%200.999%5Cdots%24%2C%20%24d_k%20%3D%209%24%20for%20all%20%24k%24%2C%20is%20the%20decimal%20expansion%20of%20%241%24%3A%0A%0A%20%20%20%20If%20not%2C%20since%20%24r'%20%3D%200.999%5Cdots%24%20clearly%20locates%20on%20the%20real%20line%2C%20it%20is%20a%20real%20number%2C%20observe%20that%20we%20have%20%240%20%5Cle%20r'%20%5Cle%201%24%20(there%20is%20no%20way%20it%20is%20greater%20than%20%241%24%20or%20be%20negative).%20If%20%24r'%20%5Cne%201%20%3D%20r%24%2C%20then%20there%20exists%20some%20other%20real%20number%20with%20%24r'%20%3C%20r%5E%7B*%7D%20%3C%20r%24%2C%20so%20we%20have%20%24r%5E%7B*%7D%20%5Cin%20%5B0%2C%201)%24%2C%20thus%20it%20has%20a%20decimal%20expansion%20as%20constructed%20above%2C%20but%20by%20the%20construction%2C%20each%20decimal%20of%20%24r%5E%7B*%7D%24%20is%20bounded%20above%20by%20%249%24%20thus%20%24r%5E%7B*%7D%24%20is%20bounded%20above%20by%20%24r'%24%2C%20so%20we%20have%20%24r'%20%3C%20r%5E%7B*%7D%20%5Cle%20r'%24%20which%20is%20a%20contradiction.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%20Section%206.2%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%201%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Determine%20whether%20the%20series%20converges%3A%20%24%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bk%20%3D%202%7D%5E%7B%5Cinfty%7D%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bk%20%5Cln%7Bk%7D%7D%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%20By%20integral%20test%20the%20series%20converges%20if%20and%20only%20if%20%24%5Cint_2%5E%7B%5Cinfty%7D%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bk%20%5Cln%7Bk%7D%7Ddk%20%3D%20%5Cln(%5Cln(k))%7C_2%5E%7B%5Cinfty%7D%24%20converges.%20Which%20is%20not%20true%20as%20%24%5Cln(%5Cln(2))%24%20is%20a%20fixed%20real%20number%20but%20%24%5Cln(%5Cln(k))%24%20goes%20to%20infinity%20as%20%24k%20%5Cto%20%5Cinfty%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%205%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Determine%20whether%20the%20series%20converges%3A%20%24%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bk%3D1%7D%5E%7B%5Cinfty%7D%5Cfrac%7Bk%7D%7B(3%2B-1%5E%7Bk%7D)%5Ek%7D%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%24%5Climsup%20%7C%20%5Cfrac%7Bk%7D%7B(3%2B-1%5E%7Bk%7D)%5Ek%7D%20%7C%5E%7B1%2Fk%7D%24%20%24%3D%20%5Climsup%20%5Cfrac%7Bk%7D%7B(3%2B-1%5E%7Bk%7D)%5Ek%7D%5E%7B1%2Fk%7D%24%20%24%3D%20%5Clim%5Climits%20%5Cfrac%7Bk%5E%7B1%2Fk%7D%7D%7B2%7D%20%3D%201%2F2%20%3C%201%24%20thus%20by%20root%20test%20the%20series%20converges.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%208%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Determine%20whether%20the%20series%20converges%3A%20%24%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bk%3D1%7D%5E%7B%5Cinfty%7Dke%5E%7B-%5Csqrt%7Bk%7D%7D%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Consider%20the%20sequence%20%24k%5E3e%5E%7B-%5Csqrt%7Bk%7D%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7Bk%5E3%7D%7Be%5E%7B%5Csqrt%7Bk%7D%7D%7D%24%2C%20taking%20%24k%20%5Cto%20%5Cinfty%24%2C%20we%20may%20apply%20L'H%C3%B4pital's%20Rule%20(for%20many%20times%E2%80%A6%20before%20the%20power%20of%20%24k%24%20on%20the%20top%20hits%20%240%24%2C%20each%20turn%20is%20valid%20because%20clearly%20%24ak%5Eb%20%5Cto%20%5Cinfty%24%20for%20positive%20%24a%2Cb%24%20and%20%24e%5E%7B%5Csqrt%7Bk%7D%7D%20%5Cto%20%5Cinfty%24)%20and%20we%20have%20that%20%24%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bk%20%5Cto%20%5Cinfty%7Dk%5E3e%5E%7B-%5Csqrt%7Bk%7D%7D%20%3D%200%24.%20We%20know%20that%20%24%5Csum%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bk%5E2%7D%24%20converges%2C%20thus%20%24%5Csum%20ke%5E%7B-%5Csqrt%7Bk%7D%7D%20%3D%20%5Csum%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bk%5E2%7Dk%5E3e%5E%7B-%5Csqrt%7Bk%7D%7D%24%20(term-wise%20product%20of%20bounded%20sequence%20and%20(absolutely)%20convergent%20series)%20is%20convergent%20by%20the%20following%20exercise.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%2011%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Prove%20that%20if%20%24%5Csum%20a_k%24%20converges%20absolutely%20and%20%24%5Clbrace%20b_k%20%5Crbrace%24%20is%20a%20bounded%20sequence%2C%20then%20%24%5Csum%20a_kb_k%24%20also%20converges%20absolutely**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20WLOG%20say%20%24a_k%2C%20b_k%20%5Cge%200%24%20for%20all%20%24k%24%20(otherwise%20simply%20take%20the%20absolute%20value%2C%20then%20%24%5Csum%20%7C%20a_k%20%7C%24%20by%20construction%20still%20converges%20absolutely%20and%20%24%5Clbrace%20%7C%20b_k%20%7C%20%5Crbrace%24%20is%20bounded).%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Say%20%24%5Clbrace%20b_k%20%5Crbrace%24%20is%20bounded%20by%20%24M%24.%20Denote%20%24s_k%20%3D%20%5Csum%20a_kb_k%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20For%20any%20%240%3Cn%3Cm%24%2C%20%24%7C%20s_m%20-%20s_n%20%7C%20%3D%20%7C%20a_%7Bn%2B1%7Db_%7Bn%2B1%7D%20%2B%20%5Cdots%20%2B%20a_mb_m%20%7C%24%20%24%5Cle%20M%7C%20a_%7Bn%2B1%7D%20%2B%5Cdots%20%2B%20a_m%7C%24.%20Since%20%24%5Csum%20a_k%24%20is%20convergent%2C%20we%20have%20that%20by%20Cauchy%20test%2C%20fixing%20%24%5Cvarepsilon%24%2C%20there%20exists%20%24N%24%20such%20that%20%24%7C%20a_%7Bn%2B1%7D%20%2B%5Cdots%20%2B%20a_m%7C%20%3C%20%5Cvarepsilon%2FM%24%20whenever%20%24n%2Cm%20%3E%20N%24.%20But%20then%20%24%7C%20s_m%20-%20s_n%20%7C%20%3C%20M%5Cvarepsilon%2FM%20%3D%20%5Cvarepsilon%24%2C%20thus%20%24%5Csum%20a_kb_k%24%20converges%20by%20Cauchy%20test.%20Since%20we%20assumed%20that%20all%20terms%20are%20positive%2C%20%24%5Csum%20a_kb_k%24%20is%20automatically%20absolutely%20convergent.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%2012%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Prove%20that%20if%20%24%5Csum%20a_k%24%20and%20%24%5Csum%20b_k%24%20are%20series%20and%20%24a_k%20%3D%20b_k%24%20except%20for%20finitely%20many%20values%20of%20%24k%24%2C%20then%20the%20two%20series%20either%20both%20converge%20or%20diverge**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20By%20assumption%20we%20can%20find%20%24N%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BN%7D%24%20such%20that%20%24a_k%20%3D%20b_k%24%20whenever%20%24k%20%3E%20N%24%2C%20otherwise%20there%20are%20infinitely%20many%20different%20%24a_k%20%5Cne%20b_k%24.%20Now%20%24%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bk%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BN%7D%7Da_k%24%20converges%20if%20and%20only%20if%20%24%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bk%20%3E%20N%7D%20a_k%20%3D%20%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bk%20%3E%20N%7D%20b_k%24%20converges%20if%20and%20only%20if%20%24%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bk%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BN%7D%7Db_k%24%20converges.%20Same%20for%20divergent%20series.%0A%20%20%20%20%22%22%22)%0A%20%20%20%20return%0A%0A%0A%40app.cell%0Adef%20_(mo)%3A%0A%20%20%20%20mo.md(r%22%22%22%0A%20%20%20%20%23%20Spring%20Semester%20Homework%204%0A%20%20%20%20%22%22%22)%0A%20%20%20%20return%0A%0A%0A%40app.cell%0Adef%20_(mo)%3A%0A%20%20%20%20mo.md(r%22%22%22%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%20Section%206.3%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%201%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Determine%20whether%20the%20given%20series%20converges%20absolutely%2C%20converges%20conditionally%2C%20or%20diverges%3A%20%24%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bk%3D1%7D%5E%7B%5Cinfty%7D%5Cfrac%7B(-1)%5Ek%7D%7Bk%5E%7B1%2F3%7D%7D%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%201.%20%24%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bk%20%5Cto%20%5Cinfty%7D%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bk%5E%7B1%2F3%7D%7D%24%20is%20%240%24%2C%20thus%20the%20alternating%20series%20converges%20simply%3B%0A%20%20%20%202.%20%241%2F3%20%3C%201%24%20thus%20we%20have%20%24%5Csum%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bk%5E%7B1%2F3%7D%7D%24%20diverges%2C%20i.e.%20the%20original%20series%20does%20not%20converge%20absolutely.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%203%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Determine%20whether%20the%20given%20series%20converges%20absolutely%2C%20converges%20conditionally%2C%20or%20diverges%3A%20%24%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bk%3D2%7D%5E%7B%5Cinfty%7D%20%5Cfrac%7B(-1)%5Ek%7D%7B%5Cln%7Bk%7D%7D%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%201.%20%24%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bk%20%5Cto%20%5Cinfty%7D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B%5Cln%7Bk%7D%7D%24%20is%20%240%24%2C%20thus%20the%20series%20converges%20simply%3B%0A%20%20%20%202.%20On%20%24(1%2C%5Cinfty)%24%2C%20%24%5Cln%7Bx%7D%24%20is%20bounded%20above%20by%20%24x%24%20because%20%24(x-%5Cln%7Bx%7D)'%20%3D1%20-%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bx%7D%20%3E%200%24%20and%20%24%5Cln%7B1%7D%20%3D%200%20%3C%201%24%3B%20since%20%24%5Csum%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bk%7D%24%20does%20not%20converge%20and%20%24%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bk%7D%20%3C%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B%5Cln%7Bk%7D%7D%24%20for%20all%20%24k%20%5Cge%202%24%2C%20%24%5Csum%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B%5Cln%7Bk%7D%7D%24%20does%20not%20converge%2C%20i.e.%20original%20series%20does%20not%20converge%20absolutely.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%205%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Determine%20whether%20the%20given%20series%20converges%20absolutely%2C%20converges%20conditionally%2C%20or%20diverges%3A%20%24%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bk%3D1%7D%5E%7B%5Cinfty%7D%5Cfrac%7B(-1)%5E%7Bk-1%7D%7D%7Bk%5E%7B2%2B(-1)%5Ek%7D%7D%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%201.%20Again%2C%20passing%20%24k%20%5Cto%20%5Cinfty%24%2C%20%24%5Clim%5Climits%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bk%5E%7B2%2B(-1)%5Ek%7D%7D%24%20is%20%240%24%20thus%20the%20series%20converges%20simply%3B%0A%20%20%20%202.%20Take%20absolute%20value%20and%20the%20series%20becomes%20%24%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B1%7D%20%2B%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%5E3%7D%20%2B%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B3%7D%20%2B%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B4%5E3%7D%20%2B%20%5Cdots%24%2C%20note%20that%20the%20odd%20terms%20constitute%20a%20series%20%241%2F1%20%2B%201%2F3%20%2B%201%2F5%20%2B%20%5Cdots%20%3D%20%5Csum%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2k%2B1%7D%24%2C%20which%20diverges%2C%20thus%20the%20original%20series%20does%20not%20converge%20absolutely.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%206%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Given%20an%20example%20of%20two%20convergent%20series%20%24%5Csum%20a_k%24%2C%20%24%5Csum%20b_k%24%20such%20that%20the%20series%20%24%5Csum%20a_kb_k%24%20diverges**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Take%20%24%5Csum%20a_k%20%3D%20%5Csum%20b_k%20%3D%20%5Csum%20%5Cfrac%7B(-1)%5Ek%7D%7Bk%5E%7B0.1%7D%7D%24%2C%20the%20two%20series%20both%20converges%20(simply)%20since%20%24k%5E%7B0.1%7D%20%5Cto%20%5Cinfty%24%2C%20but%20%24%5Csum%20a_kb_k%24%20cancels%20the%20alternating%20term%20thus%20becomes%20%24%5Csum%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bk%5E%7B0.2%7D%7D%24%20diverges%20as%20%240.2%20%3C%201%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%208%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Approximate%20the%20sum%20of%20the%20alternating%20harmonic%20series%20%241-%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%2B%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B3%7D-%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B4%7D%2B%5Cdots%2B(-1)%5E%7Bn-1%7D%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bn%7D%2B%5Cdots%24%20to%20within%20%24.01%24%20by%20computing%20an%20appropriate%20partial%20sum**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%20We%20know%20that%20for%20such%20alternating%20sums%2C%20%24%7C%20s%20-%20s_n%20%7C%20%5Cle%20a_%7Bn%2B1%7D%24%2C%20thus%20we%20want%20%24%7C%20a_%7Bn%2B1%7D%20%7C%20%5Cle%20.01%24%2C%20i.e.%20%24%7C%20a_%7Bn%2B1%7D%20%7C%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bn%2B1%7D%20%5Cle%20.01%20%5Cimplies%20n%5Cge%2099%24%2C%20computing%20the%20sum%20%24%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bk%3D1%7D%5E%7B99%7D(-1)%5E%7Bk-1%7D%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bk%7D%24%20gives%20%24%5Capprox%20.6982%24%20(notice%20that%20%2499%24%20is%20just%20an%20upper%20bound%20for%20the%20smallest%20%24n%24%2C%20for%20this%20particular%20problem%2C%20summing%20from%20%241%24%20to%20%2450%24%20is%20already%20enough).%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%20Section%206.4%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%201%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Prove%20that%20the%20function%20%24f(x)%20%3D%20%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bk%3D1%7D%5E%7B%5Cinfty%7D%5Cfrac%7Bx%5Ek%7D%7Bk%5E2%7D%24%20is%20continuous%20on%20the%20interval%20%24%5B-1%2C1%5D%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20For%20each%20%24k%24%2C%20%24%5Cfrac%7Bx%5Ek%7D%7Bk%5E2%7D%24%20continuous%20on%20%24%5B-1%2C1%5D%24%20because%20it%20is%20a%20product%20of%20%24k%24-%20%24x%24's%20and%20a%20constant%2C%20namely%20%241%2Fk%5E2%24.%20We%20want%20to%20show%20uniform%20convergence%3A%20notice%20that%20for%20%24%7C%20x%20%7C%20%5Cle%201%24%2C%20we%20have%20%24%7C%20x%5Ek%20%7C%20%5Cle%201%24%20and%20%24%7C%5Cfrac%7Bx%5Ek%7D%7Bk%5E2%7D%7C%20%5Cle%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bk%5E2%7D%24%2C%20take%20%24M_k%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bk%5E2%7D%24%20(whom%20we%20know%20that%20%24%5Csum%201%2Fk%5E2%24%20converges)%20then%20by%20Weierstrass%20M-test%20we%20have%20that%20the%20series%20of%20function%20converges%20uniformly%20to%20%24f%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%202%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Prove%20that%20the%20function%20%24f(x)%20%3D%20%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bk%3D1%7D%5E%7B%5Cinfty%7D%5Cfrac%7B%5Csin(kx)%7D%7B2%5Ek%7D%24%20is%20continuous%20on%20the%20entire%20real%20line**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20The%20idea%20is%20the%20same%3A%20first%2C%20each%20%24%5Cfrac%7B%5Csin(kx)%7D%7B2%5Ek%7D%24%20is%20continuous%20because%20it%20is%20product%20of%20constant%20and%20sine%20function%2C%20which%20is%20continuous%20on%20the%20whole%20line.%20Now%20%24%5Csin(kx)%24%20is%20always%20bounded%20by%20%241%24%2C%20and%20we%20have%20%24%7C%20%5Cfrac%7B%5Csin(kx)%7D%7B2%5Ek%7D%20%7C%20%5Cle%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%5Ek%7D%24%2C%20take%20%24M_k%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%5Ek%7D%24%20and%20notice%20that%20it%20is%20a%20convergent%20geometric%20series%2C%20thus%20by%20Weierstrass%20M-test%2C%20%24f(x)%20%3D%20%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bk%3D1%7D%5E%7B%5Cinfty%7D%5Cfrac%7B%5Csin(kx)%7D%7B2%5Ek%7D%24%20converges%20uniformly%20and%20we%20have%20%24f%24%20is%20continuous.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%205%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Find%20the%20radius%20of%20convergence%20of%20the%20indicated%20power%20series%3A%20%24%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bk%3D0%7D%5E%7B%5Cinfty%7D%20%5Cfrac%7B(-1)%5E%7Bk-1%7D%7D%7Bk%2B1%7D(x%2B2)%5Ek%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%24%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7BR%7D%20%3D%20%5Climsup%7B%7C%20%5Cfrac%7B(-1)%5E%7Bk-1%7D%7D%7Bk%2B1%7D%20%7C%5E%7B1%2Fk%7D%7D%20%3D%20%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bk%20%5Cto%20%5Cinfty%7D%5Csqrt%5Bk%5D%7B%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bk%2B1%7D%7D%20%3D%201%24%2C%20thus%20the%20radius%20of%20convergence%20is%20%241%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%207%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Find%20the%20radius%20of%20convergence%20of%20the%20indicated%20power%20series%3A%20%24%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bk%3D0%7D%5E%7B%5Cinfty%7Dk!(x-5)%5Ek%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%24%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7BR%7D%20%3D%20%5Climsup%7B%7C%20k!%20%7C%5E%7B1%2Fk%7D%7D%20%3D%20%5Clim%5Climits%7B%5Csqrt%5Bk%5D%7Bk!%7D%7D%24.%20Think%20of%20that%20(for%20simplicity%20say%20%24k%24%20even%2C%20but%20it%20does%20not%20really%20matter%20when%20sending%20it%20to%20infinity)%20%24k!%20%3D%201%5Ccdot%202%20%5Ccdot%203%20%5Ccdot%20%5Cdots%20%5Ccdot%20k%20%3E%20(%5Cfrac%7Bk%7D%7B2%7D%2B1)%20%5Ccdot%20(%5Cfrac%7Bk%7D%7B2%7D%2B2)%20%5Ccdot%20%5Cdots%20%5Ccdot%20k%20%3E%20(%5Cfrac%7Bk%7D%7B2%7D%2B1)%5E%7Bk%2F2%7D%24%2C%20in%20words%2C%20because%20half%20of%20the%20terms%20are%20larger%20than%20%24k%2F2%24.%20We%20thus%20have%20%24%5Clim%5Climits%7B%5Csqrt%5Bk%5D%7Bk!%7D%7D%20%3E%20%5Clim%5Climits%7B%5Csqrt%5Bk%5D%7B(k%2F2%20%2B%201)%5E%7Bk%2F2%7D%7D%7D%20%3D%20%5Cinfty%24%2C%20we%20have%20%241%2FR%20%3D%20%5Cinfty%20%5Cimplies%20R%20%3D%200%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%209%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Beginning%20with%20the%20geometric%20series%20which%20converges%20to%20%24%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B1-x%7D%24%20on%20%24(-1%2C1)%24%2C%20find%20power%20series%20which%20converge%20to%20%24%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B1%2Bx%5E2%7D%24%20and%20to%20%24%5Carctan%7Bx%7D%24%20on%20this%20same%20interval**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%20For%20start%20we%20have%20%24%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B1-x%7D%20%3D%20%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bn%3D0%7D%5E%7B%5Cinfty%7Dx%5En%20%3D%201%2Bx%2Bx%5E2%2Bx%5E3%2B%5Cdots%24.%20Notice%20that%20%24x%20%5Cin%20(-1%2C1)%20%5Cimplies%20-x%5E2%20%5Cin%20(-1%2C0%5D%24%20so%20we%20can%20take%20a%20substitution%3A%20%24%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B1%2Bx%5E2%7D%20%3D%20%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bn%3D0%7D%5E%7B%5Cinfty%7D(-x%5E2)%5En%20%3D%201-x%5E2%2Bx%5E4-x%5E6%2B%5Cdots%24.%20The%20radius%20of%20convergence%20of%20this%20power%20series%20is%20clearly%20%241%24%2C%20because%20the%20coefficients%20%24c_k%24%20is%20of%20the%20form%20%24-1%5Ek%24%2C%20denote%20%24f(x)%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B1%2Bx%5E2%7D%20%3D%20%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bn%3D0%7D%5E%7B%5Cinfty%7D(-x%5E2)%5En%20%3D%20%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bn%3D0%7D%5E%7B%5Cinfty%7D(-1)%5Enx%5E%7B2n%7D%24%2C%20we%20have%20that%20%24%5Cint_0%5Ex%20f(x)dx%20%3D%20%5Carctan%7Bx%7D%20%3D%20%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bn%3D0%7D%5E%7B%5Cinfty%7D%5Cfrac%7B(-1)%5En%7D%7B2n%2B1%7Dx%5E%7B2n%2B1%7D%20%3D%20x-%5Cfrac%7Bx%5E3%7D%7B3%7D%2B%5Cfrac%7Bx%5E5%7D%7B5%7D-%5Cdots%24%20on%20%24(-1%2C1)%24.%0A%20%20%20%20%22%22%22)%0A%20%20%20%20return%0A%0A%0A%40app.cell%0Adef%20_(mo)%3A%0A%20%20%20%20mo.md(r%22%22%22%0A%20%20%20%20%23%20Spring%20Semester%20Homework%205%0A%20%20%20%20%22%22%22)%0A%20%20%20%20return%0A%0A%0A%40app.cell%0Adef%20_(mo)%3A%0A%20%20%20%20mo.md(r%22%22%22%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%20Section%207.1%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%207%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**For%20a%20norm%20on%20a%20vector%20space%20%24X%24%20define%20by%20an%20inner%20product%2C%20prove%20that%20the%20parallelogram%20law%3A%20%24%5C%7C%20x%2By%20%5C%7C%5E2%20%2B%20%5C%7C%20xy%5C%7C%5E2%20%3D%202%5C%7C%20x%5C%7C%5E2%20%2B%202%20%5C%7C%20y%20%5C%7C%5E2%24%20holds%20for%20all%20%24x%2C%20y%20%5Cin%20X%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%24%5C%7C%20x%2By%20%5C%7C%5E2%20%2B%20%5C%7C%20xy%5C%7C%5E2%24%20%24%5Coverset%7B%5Ctext%7Bdef%7D%7D%7B%3D%7D%20(x%2By)%20%5Ccdot%20(x%2By)%20%2B%20(x-y)%20%5Ccdot%20(x-y)%24%20expand%20it%20by%207.1.5%20(using%20the%20distributivity%20and%20other%20properties%20of%20inner%20product)%20we%20have%20%24%3D%20x%5Ccdot%20x%20%2B%202x%5Ccdot%20y%20%2B%20y%20%5Ccdot%20y%20%2B%20x%5Ccdot%20x%20-%202x%5Ccdot%20y%20%2B%20y%20%5Ccdot%20y%20%3D%202x%5Ccdot%20x%20%2B%202y%20%5Ccdot%20y%24%20is%20exactly%20the%20right%20hand%20side%20of%20the%20original%20equation.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%208%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Prove%20that%20%24%5C%7C%20%5Ccdot%20%5C%7C_%7B%5Cinfty%7D%24%20is%20a%20norm%20on%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5Ed%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20We%20check%20the%20three%20axioms%3A%0A%0A%20%20%20%201.%20For%20any%20%24x%2C%20y%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5Ed%24%2C%20%24%5C%7C%20x%20%5C%7C_%7B%5Cinfty%7D%20%2B%20%5C%7C%20y%20%5C%7C_%7B%5Cinfty%7D%24%20%24%3D%20%5Cmax%7B%7C%20x_i%20%7C%7D%20%2B%20%5Cmax%7B%7C%20y_i%20%7C%7D%24%20%24%3D%20%7C%20x_I%20%7C%20%2B%20%7C%20y_J%20%7C%24%20for%20some%20%24i%2Cj%24.%20We%20reduce%20the%20problem%20to%20the%20absolute%20value%20(dimension%20%241%24%20case)%2C%20and%20we%20know%20that%20for%20any%20%24x_i%2C%20y_j%24%20we%20have%20%24%7C%20x_i%20%2B%20y_j%20%7C%20%5Cle%20%7C%20x_i%20%7C%20%2B%20%7C%20y_j%20%7C%24%2C%20thus%20%24%7C%20x_I%20%7C%20%2B%20%7C%20y_J%20%7C%20%5Cge%20%7C%20(x%2By)_K%20%7C%20%3D%20%5C%7C%20x%2By%20%5C%7C_%7B%5Cinfty%7D%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%202.%20%24%5C%7C%20ax%20%5C%7C_%7B%5Cinfty%7D%20%3D%20%5Cmax%7B%7C%20ax_i%20%7C%7D%20%3D%20a%5Cmax%7B%7C%20x_i%20%7C%7D%20%3D%20a%20%5C%7C%20x%20%5C%7C_%7B%5Cinfty%7D%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%203.%20If%20%24%5C%7C%20x%20%5C%7C_%7B%5Cinfty%7D%20%3D%200%24%20then%20%24%5Cmax%7B%7C%20x_i%20%7C%7D%20%3D%200%24%2C%20implies%20that%20%240%20%5Cge%20%7C%20x_i%20%7C%24%20for%20all%20%24i%24.%20Since%20%24%7C%20x_i%20%7C%20%5Cge%200%24%20for%20any%20%24i%24%20by%20the%20property%20of%20the%20absolute%20value%2C%20we%20have%20that%20%24x_i%20%3D%200%24%20for%20all%20%24i%24%2C%20i.e.%20%24x%20%3D%200%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%2010%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Prove%20that%20the%20space%20%24C(I)%24%20is%20a%20vector%20space**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20First%20recall%20that%20sum%20of%20two%20continuous%20functions%20is%20continuous%3B%20(point-wise)%20product%20of%20two%20continuous%20functions%20is%20continuous%3B%20constant%20map%20is%20continuous.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Also%20that%20two%20functions%20are%20said%20to%20be%20the%20same%20if%20they%20have%20the%20same%20domain%20and%20codomain%2C%20and%20the%20value-assignments%20are%20the%20same.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20In%20fact%2C%20all%20the%20axioms%20are%20pretty%20much%20directly%20inherited%20from%20the%20fact%20that%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5Ed%24%20itself%20is%20a%20vector%20space%3A%0A%0A%20%20%20%201.%20%24(f%2Bg)%2Bh%20%3D%20f%2B(g%2Bh)%24%20is%20inherited%20from%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5Ed%24%3A%20for%20each%20%24i%20%5Cin%20I%24%2C%20%24(f%2Bg)%2Bh%24%20assign%20%24i%24%20to%20%24(f(i)%20%2B%20g(i))%20%2B%20h(i)%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5Ed%24%2C%20since%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5Ed%24%20is%20a%20vector%20space%2C%20%24(f(i)%20%2B%20g(i))%20%2B%20h(i)%20%3D%20f(i)%20%2B%20(g(i)%20%2B%20h(i))%24%2C%20so%20the%20term-wise%20assignments%20are%20same%2C%20the%20domain%20is%20always%20%24I%24%2C%20and%20sum%20of%20continuous%20function%20is%20continuous%20function%2C%20thus%20%24(f%2Bg)%2Bh%20%3D%20f%2B(g%2Bh)%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%202.%20%24f%2Bg%20%3D%20g%2Bf%24%20same%20by%20above%3B%0A%20%20%20%203.%20%24(0%2Bf)%20%3D%20f%24%20same%20by%20above%3B%0A%20%20%20%204.%20%240f%20%3D%200%24%20and%20%241f%20%3D%20f%24%2C%20they%20are%20inherited%20from%20the%20properties%20of%20multiplication%20in%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5Ed%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%205.%20%24a(bf)%20%3D%20(ab)f%24%20same%20by%20above%3B%0A%20%20%20%206.%20%24(a%2Bb)f%20%3D%20af%2Bbf%24%3A%20%24(a%2Bb)f%24%20assign%20each%20%24i%20%5Cin%20I%24%20to%20%24(a%2Bb)f(i)%20%3D%20af(i)%20%2B%20bf(i)%24%20because%20%24f(i)%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5Ed%24%20is%20a%20vector%20space%3B%0A%20%20%20%207.%20%24a(f%2Bg)%20%3D%20af%2Bag%24%20similar%20by%20above.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%2011%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Prove%20that%20the%20sup%20norm%20is%20really%20a%20norm%20on%20%24C(I)%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20We%20check%20the%20three%20axioms%3A%0A%0A%20%20%20%201.%20%24%5C%7C%20f%20%5C%7C_%7B%5Cinfty%7D%20%2B%20%5C%7C%20g%20%5C%7C_%7B%5Cinfty%7D%24%20%24%5Coverset%7B%5Ctext%7Bdef%7D%7D%7B%3D%7D%20%5Csup%5Climits%7B%7C%20f(x)%20%7C%7D%20%2B%20%5Csup%5Climits%7B%7C%20g(x)%20%7C%7D%24%2C%20again%20we%20reduced%20the%20problem%20to%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%24%20and%20we%20know%20that%20this%20is%20%24%5Cge%20%5Csup%5Climits%7B%7C%20(f%2Bg)(x)%20%7C%7D%24%20%24%3D%20%5C%7C%20f%2Bg%20%5C%7C_%7B%5Cinfty%7D%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%202.%20%24%5C%7C%20af%20%5C%7C_%7B%5Cinfty%7D%20%3D%20%5Csup%5Climits%7B%7C%20af(x)%20%7C%7D%20%3D%20a%5Csup%5Climits%7B%7C%20f(x)%20%7C%7D%20%3D%20a%20%5C%7C%20f%20%5C%7C_%7B%5Cinfty%7D%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%203.%20If%20%24%5C%7C%20f%20%5C%7C_%7B%5Cinfty%7D%20%3D%200%24%20then%20%24%5Csup%5Climits%7B%7C%20f(x)%20%7C%7D%20%3D%200%24%20implies%20%24%7C%20f(x)%20%7C%24%20is%20bounded%20above%20by%20%240%24%2C%20i.e.%20%24%7C%20f(x)%20%7C%20%5Cle%200%24%2C%20but%20it%20is%20also%20greater%20than%20or%20equal%20to%20%240%24%20because%20of%20the%20absolute%20value%2C%20thus%20%24%7C%20f(x)%20%7C%20%5Cequiv%200%20%5Cimplies%20f(x)%20%5Cequiv%200%24%2C%20meaning%20%24f%20%3D%200%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%2012%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Prove%20that%20if%20%24%5Clbrace%20x_k%20%5Crbrace%24%20and%20%24%5Clbrace%20y_k%20%5Crbrace%24%20are%20sequences%20of%20real%20numbers%20such%20that%20%24%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bk%3D1%7D%5E%7B%5Cinfty%7Dx_k%5E2%20%3C%20%5Cinfty%24%20and%20%24%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bk%3D1%7D%5E%7B%5Cinfty%7Dy_k%5E2%20%3C%20%5Cinfty%24%20then%20%24%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bk%20%3D%201%7D%5E%7B%5Cinfty%7D%7C%20x_ky_k%20%7C%20%3C%20%5Cinfty%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20For%20each%20%24k%24%20we%20have%20%240%20%5Cle%20(x_k%20-%20y_k)%5E2%20%3D%20x_k%5E2%20%2B%20y_k%5E2%20-%202x_ky_k%24%20which%20implies%20%24x_ky_k%20%5Cle%20x_k%5E2%20%2B%20y_k%5E2%24%2C%20so%20does%20%24%7C%20x_ky_k%20%7C%20%5Cle%20x_k%5E2%20%2B%20y_k%5E2%24.%20If%20%24%5Csum%20x_k%5E2%24%20and%20%24%5Csum%20y_k%5E2%24%20are%20bounded%2C%20their%20term-wise%20sum%20%24%5Csum%20x_k%5E2%2By_k%5E2%24%20is%20also%20bounded%2C%20thus%20%24%5Csum%20%7C%20x_ky_k%20%7C%24%20is%20bounded%20by%20above%20argument.%20Moreover%2C%20this%20sequence%20is%20naturally%20non-decreasing%2C%20thus%20it%20is%20convergent%20(being%20bounded%20and%20monotone)%2C%20thus%20we%20write%20%24%5Csum%20%7C%20x_ky_k%20%7C%20%3C%20%5Cinfty%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%2013%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Find%20a%20non-zero%20vector%20in%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5E3%24%20which%20is%20orthogonal%20to%20both%20%24(1%2C0%2C2)%24%20and%20%24(3%2C-1%2C1)%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%20We%20want%20a%20%24(a%2Cb%2Cc)%24%20such%20that%20%24a%2B2c%20%3D%200%24%20and%20%243a-b%2Bc%20%3D%200%24.%20The%20solution%20can%20be%20pretty%20arbitrary%2C%20for%20example%2C%20take%20%24a%20%3D%202%24%20and%20%24c%20%3D%20-1%24%20so%20that%20the%20first%20equation%20is%20satisfied%2C%20then%20solve%20for%20%24b%20%3D%205%24%2C%20and%20the%20result%20%24(2%2C5%2C-1)%24%20is%20orthogonal%20to%20both%20vectors.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%20Section%207.2%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%205%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Determine%20whether%20or%20not%20the%20sequence%20converges%20and%20find%20its%20limit%20if%20it%20does%20converge%3A%20%24x_n%20%3D%20(%5Cln%7Bn%2B1%7D%20-%20%5Cln%7Bn%7D%2C%20%5Csin(1%2Fn))%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Rewrite%20%24x_n%20%3D%20(%5Cln%7B(%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bn%7D%2B1)%7D%2C%20%5Csin(1%2Fn))%24%2C%20sending%20%24n%20%5Cto%20%5Cinfty%24%20we%20have%20%24%5Cln%7B(%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bn%7D%2B1)%7D%20%5Cto%20%5Cln%7B1%7D%20%3D%200%24%20and%20%24%5Csin(1%2Fn)%20%5Cto%200%24%20component-wise%2C%20combine%20them%20together%20we%20have%20%24x_n%20%5Cto%20(0%2C0)%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%209%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**If%20%24x_n%20%3D%20(%5Csin(n)%2C%5Ccos(n)%2C1%2B(-1)%5En)%24%2C%20does%20the%20sequence%20%24%5Clbrace%20x_n%20%5Crbrace%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5E3%24%20have%20a%20convergent%20subsequence**%3F%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Yes%2C%20because%20sine%2C%20cosine%20and%20%241%5Cpm%201%24%20are%20all%20bounded.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20To%20actually%20find%20such%20a%20sequence%2C%20notice%20that%20%24n%24%20is%20rational%20but%20%24%5Cpi%24%20is%20not%2C%20thus%20%24%5Csin(n)%20%5Cne%20%5Csin(0)%20%3D%200%24%20and%20%24%5Ccos(n)%20%5Cne%20%5Ccos(0)%20%3D%201%24%20for%20any%20%24n%20%3E%200%24.%20Start%20with%20%24n_0%20%3D%200%24%20(or%20just%20start%20with%20%24n_1%24%2C%20it%20does%20not%20really%20matter)%2C%20now%3A%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Let%20%24n_1%24%20be%20an%20integer%20greater%20than%20%24n_0%24%20with%20the%20property%20that%20%24%7C%20%5Csin(n_1)%20%7C%20%3C%201%2F1%24%20and%20%24%7C%20%5Ccos(n_1)%20-1%20%7C%20%3C%201%2F1%24%3B%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Let%20%24n_2%24%20be%20an%20integer%20greater%20than%20%24n_1%24%20with%20the%20property%20that%20%24%7C%20%5Csin(n_2)%20%7C%20%3C%201%2F2%24%20and%20%24%7C%20%5Ccos(n_2)%20-1%20%7C%20%3C%201%2F2%24%3B%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Continue%20this%20we%20find%20a%20sequence%20%24n_i%24%20such%20that%20%24x_%7Bn_i%7D%24%20with%20limit%20%24(%5Csin(0)%2C%20%5Ccos(0)%2C2)%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%2012%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**If%20for%20%24x%2Cy%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%24%2C%20we%20set%20%24%5Cdelta(x%2Cy)%20%3D0%24%20if%20%24x%20%3D%20y%24%20and%20%24%5Cdelta(x%2Cy)%20%3D%201%24%20if%20%24x%20%5Cne%20y%24%2C%20prove%20that%20the%20result%20is%20a%20metric%20on%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20We%20check%20by%20axioms%3A%0A%0A%20%20%20%201.%20If%20%24x%20%3D%20y%24%20then%20%24%5Cdelta(x%2Cy)%20%3D%200%20%3D%20%5Cdelta(y%2Cx)%24%2C%20if%20%24x%5Cne%20y%24%20then%20%24%5Cdelta(x%2Cy)%20%3D%201%20%3D%20%5Cdelta(y%2Cx)%24%2C%20either%20case%20the%20equality%20holds%3B%0A%20%20%20%202.%20Axiom%20%242%24%20is%20true%20by%20assumption%3B%0A%20%20%20%203.%20If%20%24x%20%3D%20z%24%20then%20%240%20%3D%20%5Cdelta(x%2Cz)%20%5Cle%20%5Cdelta(x%2Cy)%20%2B%20%5Cdelta(y%2Cz)%24%20no%20matter%20if%20%24x%20%3D%20y%24%20or%20not%2C%20%24y%20%3D%20z%24%20or%20not%3B%20if%20%24x%20%5Cne%20z%24%20then%20%241%20%3D%20%5Cdelta(x%2Cz)%24%2C%20if%20%24y%20%3D%20x%24%20then%20%24%5Cdelta(x%2Cy)%20%2B%20%5Cdelta(y%2Cz)%20%3D%200%2B1%20%3D%201%24%2C%20if%20%24y%20%5Cne%20x%24%20but%20%24y%20%3D%20z%24%20(or%20equals%20%24x%24%20but%20not%20%24z%24)%20then%20%24%5Cdelta(x%2Cy)%20%2B%20%5Cdelta(y%2Cz)%20%3D%201%2B0%20%3D%201%24%2C%20if%20%24y%20%5Cne%20x%24%20and%20%24y%20%5Cne%20z%24%20then%20%24%5Cdelta(x%2Cy)%20%2B%20%5Cdelta(y%2Cz)%20%3D%201%2B1%20%3D%202%24%2C%20so%20either%20case%20the%20inequality%20holds.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%2013%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**What%20are%20the%20convergent%20sequences%20in%20the%20metric%20space%20described%20in%20the%20previous%20exercise**%3F%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%20They%20must%20be%20the%20sequences%20that%20are%20'eventually%20constant'%2C%20i.e.%20%24x_n%20%3D%20c%24%20for%20all%20%24n%20%3E%20N%24%20(in%20this%20case%20the%20limit%20is%20clearly%20%24c%24).%20Otherwise%20any%20potential%20limit%20%24x%24%20is%20not%20equal%20to%2C%20thus%20has%20distance%20%241%24%20with%2C%20infinitely%20many%20%24x_n%24's%2C%20thus%20is%20not%20the%20limit%20for%20%24x_n%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%2014%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Let%20%24a%2Cb%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5E2%24%20and%20let%20%24X%24%20be%20the%20set%20of%20all%20smooth%20parameterized%20curves%20joining%20%24a%24%20to%20%24b%24%20in%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5E2%24%20with%20parameter%20interval%20%24%5B0%2C1%5D%24.%20That%20is%2C%20%24X%24%20is%20the%20set%20of%20all%20continuously%20differentiable%20functions%20%24%5Cgamma%3A%5B0%2C1%5D%20%5Cto%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5E2%24%2C%20with%20%24%5Cgamma(0)%20%3D%20a%24%20and%20%24%5Cgamma(1)%20%3D%20b%24.%20Show%20that%20is%20%24%5Cdelta(%5Cgamma_1%2C%5Cgamma_2)%20%3D%20%5Csup%5Climits%7B%5Clbrace%20%5C%7C%20%5Cgamma_1(t)-%5Cgamma_2(t)%20%5C%7C%3A%20t%20%5Cin%20%5B0%2C1%5D%20%5Crbrace%7D%24%20then%20%24%5Cdelta%24%20is%20a%20metric%20on%20%24X%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20We%20check%20the%20three%20axioms%3A%0A%0A%20%20%20%201.%20Use%20the%20fact%20that%20%24%5C%7C%20x%20-%20y%20%5C%7C%20%3D%20%5Csqrt%7B%5Csum%5Climits(x-y)_i%5E2%7D%20%3D%20%5Csqrt%7B(y-x)_i%5E2%7D%20%3D%20%5C%7C%20y%20-%20x%20%5C%7C%24%2C%20we%20can%20see%20that%20by%20assumption%20%24%5Cdelta(%5Cgamma_1%2C%5Cgamma_2)%20%3D%20%5Cdelta(%5Cgamma_2%2C%20%5Cgamma_1)%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%202.%20If%20%24%5Cgamma_1%20%3D%20%5Cgamma_2%24%20then%20the%20supreme%20of%20the%20normal%20is%20clearly%20%240%24%2C%20thus%20%24%5Cdelta(%5Cgamma_1%2C%20%5Cgamma_2)%20%3D%200%24%3B%20on%20the%20other%20hand%2C%20if%20%24%5Cdelta(%5Cgamma_1%2C%5Cgamma_2)%20%3D%20%5Csup%5Climits%7B%5Clbrace%20%5C%7C%20%5Cgamma_1(t)-%5Cgamma_2(t)%20%5C%7C%3A%20t%20%5Cin%20%5B0%2C1%5D%20%5Crbrace%7D%20%3D%200%24%20then%20%24%5C%7C%20%5Cgamma_1(t)-%5Cgamma_2(t)%20%5C%7C%24%20is%20bounded%20above%20by%20%240%24%2C%20it%20is%20naturally%20bounded%20below%20by%20%240%24%2C%20thus%20%24%5Cgamma_1%20-%20%5Cgamma_2%20%5Cequiv%200%24%20implies%20that%20they%20are%20identical%3B%0A%20%20%20%203.%20Use%20the%20fact%20that%20%24%5C%7C%20%5Ccdot%20%5C%7C%24%20is%20a%20norm%20in%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5E2%24%2C%20we%20have%20%24%5C%7C%20%5Cgamma_1(t)-%5Cgamma_2(t)%20%5C%7C%20%5Cle%20%5C%7C%20%5Cgamma_1(t)-%5Cgamma_3(t)%20%5C%7C%20%2B%20%5C%7C%20%5Cgamma_3(t)-%5Cgamma_2(t)%20%5C%7C%24%20so%20that%20we%20have%20%24%5Csup%5Climits(%5C%7C%20%5Cgamma_1(t)-%5Cgamma_2(t)%20%5C%7C)%24%20%24%5Cle%20%5Csup%5Climits(%5C%7C%20%5Cgamma_1(t)-%5Cgamma_3(t)%20%5C%7C%20%2B%20%5C%7C%20%5Cgamma_3(t)-%5Cgamma_2(t)%20%5C%7C)%24%20%24%5Cle%20%5Csup%5Climits(%5C%7C%20%5Cgamma_1(t)-%5Cgamma_3(t)%20%5C%7C)%20%2B%20%5Csup%5Climits(%5C%7C%20%5Cgamma_3(t)-%5Cgamma_2(t)%20%5C%7C)%24.%20The%20triangle%20inequality%20follows.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%2015%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Show%20that%20the%20metric%20space%20of%20the%20previous%20exercise%20is%20not%20complete**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Construct%20a%20sequence%20of%20functions%20as%20follow%3A%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Let%20all%20%24f_i%24%20be%20defined%20on%20%24%5B0%2C1%5D%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%201.%20Starting%20with%20%24f_1%24%2C%20let%20it%20be%20the%20smooth%20function%20with%20the%20assignment%20%24f_1(1%2F2)%3D(1%2F2%2C0)%24.%20Join%20%24f_1(0)%24%20and%20%24f_1(1%2F2)%24%20by%20the%20well-known%20smooth%20function%20%24r(t)%20%3D%20e%5E%7B-1%2Ft%5E2%7D%24.%20The%20curve%20we%20actually%20use%20will%20be%20smooth%20and%20non-increasing%3B%0A%20%20%20%202.%20For%20%24f_2%24%2C%20let%20it%20be%20the%20smooth%20function%20with%20the%20assignment%20%24f_2(1%2F2)%20%3D%20(1%2F2%2C%201%2F2)%24%20and%20%24f_2(2%2F3)%20%3D%20(2%2F3%2C%200)%24.%20Join%20both%20%24f_2(0)%20%5Cleftrightarrow%20f_2(1%2F2)%24%2C%20also%20%24f_2(1%2F2)%20%5Cleftrightarrow%20f_2(2%2F3)%24%20by%20the%20smooth%20curve%3B%0A%20%20%20%203.%20For%20%24f_3%24%2C%20let%20it%20be%20the%20smooth%20function%20with%20the%20assignment%20%24f_3(1%2F2)%20%3D%20(1%2F2%2C%201%2F2)%24%2C%20%24f_3(2%2F3)%20%3D%20(2%2F3%2C%201%2F3)%24%20and%20%24f_3(3%2F4)%20%3D%20(3%2F4%2C%200)%24.%20Join%20both%20%24f_3(0)%20%5Cleftrightarrow%20f_3(1%2F2)%24%2C%20%24f_3(1%2F2)%20%5Cleftrightarrow%20f_3(2%2F3)%24%20and%20%24f_3(2%2F3)%20%5Cleftrightarrow%20f_3(3%2F4)%24%20by%20the%20smooth%20curve.%20Use%20the%20same%20curve%20joining%20%24f_2(0)%20%5Cleftrightarrow%20f_2(1%2F2)%24%20to%20join%20%24f_3(0)%20%5Cleftrightarrow%20f_3(1%2F2)%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proceed%20like%20above%20and%20we%20have%20a%20sequence%20of%20smooth%20function%20that%20all%20have%20%24f_i(0)%3D(0%2C1)%24%20and%20are%20'eventually%20zero'.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20This%20sequence%20is%20Cauchy%20but%20not%20convergent%20when%20equip%20with%20the%20sup%20norm%3A%0A%0A%20%20%20%201.%20Cauchy%3A%20%24%5Cdelta(f_i%2C%20f_j)%20%3D%20%5Csup%5Climits%7B%5Clbrace%20%5C%7C%20f_i(t)%20-%20f_j(t)%20%5C%7C%20%5Crbrace%7D%24%2C%20observe%20from%20the%20graph%20that%20the%20distance%20between%20%24f_i%24%20and%20%24f_j%24%20is%20at%20most%20%241%2Fi%24%20(for%20example%2C%20difference%20between%20%24f_2%24%20and%20%24f_3%24%20is%20bounded%20above%20by%20%241%2F2%24%2C%20because%20the%20first%20half%20and%20last%20%241%2F4%24%20of%20the%20two%20curves%20are%20the%20same%2C%20and%20this%20sup%20distance%20can%20be%20only%20attained%20somewhere%20in%20the%20interval%20%24%5B1%2F2%2C3%2F4%5D%24).%20Since%20%241%2Fi%24%20goes%20to%20%240%24%20when%20we%20send%20%24i%20%5Cto%20%5Cinfty%24%2C%20the%20sequence%20is%20Cauchy%3B%0A%20%20%20%202.%20Not%20convergent%3A%20suppose%20it%20is%20convergent%20to%20%24f%24%2C%20since%20all%20%24f_i%24%20are%20eventually%20zero%2C%20%24f%24%20must%20also%20be%20eventually%20%240%24%2C%20i.e.%20exists%20%24n%20%5Cin%20%5B0%2C1%5D%24%20such%20that%20%24f(x)%3D0%2C%20%5Cforall%20x%20%5Cin%20%5Bn%2C1%5D%24.%20Choose%20%24M%24%20such%20that%20%241-1%2FM%20%3E%20n%24%2C%20and%20consider%20%24%5Cvarepsilon%20%3C%201%2FM%24%3A%20then%20for%20any%20%24m%3EM%24%2C%20%24%5C%7C%20f_m(1-1%2FM)%20-%20f(1-1%2FM)%20%5C%7C%24%20%24%3D%20%5C%7C%20(1-1%2FM%2C%201%2FM)%20-%20(1-1%2FM%2C%200)%20%5C%7C%24%20%24%3D%201%2FM%24%2C%20but%20then%20%24%5Cdelta(f%2C%20f_m)%20%5Cge%201%2FM%20%3E%20%5Cvarepsilon%24%2C%20meaning%20that%20%24f%24%20is%20not%20the%20limit%20after%20all.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%2017%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Imagine%20a%20large%20building%20with%20many%20rooms%2C%20let%20%24X%24%20be%20the%20set%20of%20rooms%20in%20this%20building%20and%20%24%5Cdelta(x%2Cy)%24%20is%20the%20length%20of%20the%20shortest%20path%20along%20the%20hallways%20and%20stairways%20of%20the%20building%20that%20leads%20from%20room%20%24x%24%20to%20room%20%24y%24.%20Show%20that%20%24%5Cdelta%24%20is%20a%20metric%20on%20%24X%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20We%20check%20the%20three%20axioms%3A%0A%0A%20%20%20%201.%20The%20shortest%20path%20from%20%24x%24%20to%20%24y%24%20and%20%24y%24%20to%20%24x%24%20naturally%20should%20be%20the%20same%3B%0A%20%20%20%202.%20The%20shortest%20path%20from%20a%20room%20to%20the%20same%20room%20is%20%240%24%2C%20and%20if%20the%20path%20is%20%240%24%20(i.e.%20we%20do%20not%20move)%2C%20then%20we%20clearly%20stay%20in%20the%20same%20room%3B%0A%20%20%20%203.%20Suppose%20not%20(i.e.%20the%20shortest%20path%20from%20%24x%24%20to%20%24z%24%20is%20longer%20than%20from%20%24x%24%20to%20%24y%24%20plus%20from%20%24y%24%20to%20%24z%24)%2C%20then%20we%20go%20first%20from%20%24x%24%20to%20%24y%24%20then%20from%20%24y%24%20to%20%24z%24%20gives%20us%20a%20shorter%20path%20from%20%24x%24%20to%20%24z%24%2C%20which%20contradict%20the%20fact%20that%20we%20are%20given%20a%20'shortest'%20path%20from%20%24x%24%20to%20%24z%24.%0A%20%20%20%20%22%22%22)%0A%20%20%20%20return%0A%0A%0A%40app.cell%0Adef%20_(mo)%3A%0A%20%20%20%20mo.md(r%22%22%22%0A%20%20%20%20%23%20Spring%20Semester%20Homework%206%0A%20%20%20%20%22%22%22)%0A%20%20%20%20return%0A%0A%0A%40app.cell%0Adef%20_(mo)%3A%0A%20%20%20%20mo.md(r%22%22%22%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%205.4.9%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**For%20which%20values%20of%20%24p%3E0%24%20does%20the%20improper%20integral%20%24%5Cint_%7B0%7D%5E%7B1%7D%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bx%5Ep%7Ddx%24%20converge**%3F%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%20By%20definition%20in%20the%20book%20we%20have%20the%20improper%20integral%20%24%5Cint_%7B0%7D%5E%7B1%7D%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bx%5Ep%7Ddx%20%3D%20%5Clim%5Climits_%7Ba%20%5Cto%200%5E%2B%7D%5Cint_a%5E1%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bx%5Ep%7Ddx%24%20(if%20the%20limit%20exists).%0A%0A%20%20%20%20By%20FTC%20we%20have%3A%20for%20%24p%20%5Cne%201%24%2C%20%24(%5Cfrac%7Bx%5E%7B1-p%7D%7D%7B1-p%7D)'%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bx%5Ep%7D%24%20thus%20%24%5Clim%5Climits_%7Ba%20%5Cto%200%5E%2B%7D%5Cint_a%5E1%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bx%5Ep%7Ddx%3D%5Clim%5Climits_%7Ba%20%5Cto%200%5E%2B%7D(%5Cfrac%7B1%5E%7B1-p%7D%7D%7B1-p%7D%20-%20%5Cfrac%7Ba%5E%7B1-p%7D%7D%7B1-p%7D)%24%2C%20this%20limit%20exists%20if%20%24p%20%3C%201%24%20(in%20this%20case%20%24a%5E%7B1-p%7D%20%5Cto%200%24)%20and%20it%20diverges%20for%20%24p%3E%201%24%20because%20%24a%5E%7B1-p%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Ba%5E%7Bp-1%7D%7D%20%5Cto%20%5Cinfty%24%20when%20passing%20%24a%20%5Cto%200%5E%2B%24%20in%20this%20case.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20For%20%24p%20%3D%201%24%2C%20%24(%5Cln%7Bx%7D)'%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bx%7D%24%2C%20and%20we%20know%20that%20the%20improper%20integral%20does%20not%20converge%20because%20%24%5Cln%7Bx%7D%20%5Cto%20-%5Cinfty%24%20as%20%24x%20%5Cto%200%5E%2B%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20So%20in%20conclusion%2C%20the%20improper%20integral%20converge%20for%20%240%3Cp%3C1%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Another%20Problem%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Find%20%24%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bn%20%5Cto%20%5Cinfty%7D%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bk%3D1%7D%5En(%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B%5Csqrt%7Bn%7D%2B%5Cfrac%7Bk%7D%7B%5Csqrt%7Bn%7D%7D%7D)%5E2%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%20First%20a%20little%20bit%20rewrite%3A%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%24%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bn%20%5Cto%20%5Cinfty%7D%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bk%3D1%7D%5En(%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B%5Csqrt%7Bn%7D%2B%5Cfrac%7Bk%7D%7B%5Csqrt%7Bn%7D%7D%7D)%5E2%24%20%24%3D%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bn%20%5Cto%20%5Cinfty%7D%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bk%3D1%7D%5En%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bn%2B%5Cfrac%7Bk%5E2%7D%7Bn%7D%2B2k%7D%24%20%24%3D%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bn%20%5Cto%20%5Cinfty%7D%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bk%3D1%7D%5En%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bn%7D%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B1%2B%5Cfrac%7Bk%5E2%7D%7Bn%5E2%7D%2B%5Cfrac%7B2k%7D%7Bn%7D%7D%24%20%24%3D%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bn%20%5Cto%20%5Cinfty%7D%5Csum%5Climits_%7Bk%3D1%7D%5E%7Bn%7D%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bn%7D%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B(1%2B%5Cfrac%7Bk%7D%7Bn%7D)%5E2%7D%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Recognize%20this%20as%20the%20Riemann%20sum%20%24%3D%20%5Cint_0%5E1%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B(1%2Bx)%5E2%7Ddx%24%20(%24%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B(1%2Bx)%5E2%7D%24%20is%20continuous%20and%20bounded%20on%20%24%5B0%2C1%5D%24)%2C%20since%20%24(-%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B1%2Bx%7D)'%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B(1%2Bx)%5E2%7D%24%2C%20we%20have%20the%20integral%20%24%3D%20-%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B1%2B1%7D%20%2B%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B1%2B0%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%24.%0A%20%20%20%20%22%22%22)%0A%20%20%20%20return%0A%0A%0A%40app.cell%0Adef%20_(mo)%3A%0A%20%20%20%20mo.md(r%22%22%22%0A%20%20%20%20%23%20Spring%20Semester%20Homework%207%0A%20%20%20%20%22%22%22)%0A%20%20%20%20return%0A%0A%0A%40app.cell%0Adef%20_(mo)%3A%0A%20%20%20%20mo.md(r%22%22%22%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%20Section%207.3%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%204%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Find%20the%20interior%2C%20closure%2C%20and%20boundary%20for%20the%20set%20%24%5Clbrace%20(x%2Cy)%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5E2%20%7C%20%5C%7C%20(x%2Cy)%20%5C%7C%20%3C%201%20%5Crbrace%20%5Ccup%20%5Clbrace%20(x%2Cy)%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5E2%20%7C%20y%20%3D%200%2C%20-2%20%3Cx%20%3C%202%20%5Crbrace%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%201.%20Interior%3A%20for%20any%20%24(x%2Cy)%20%5Cin%20%5Clbrace%20(x%2Cy)%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5E2%20%7C%20%5C%7C%20(x%2Cy)%20%5C%7C%20%3C%201%20%5Crbrace%24%2C%20choose%20small%20enough%20%24%5Cvarepsilon%24%20and%20we%20have%20%24B((x%2Cy)%2C%5Cvarepsilon)%20%5Csubseteq%20%5Clbrace%20(x%2Cy)%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5E2%20%7C%20%5C%7C%20(x%2Cy)%20%5C%7C%20%3C%201%20%5Crbrace%24%20thus%20in%20the%20union.%20Thus%20%24(x%2Cy)%24%20is%20in%20the%20interior.%20For%20any%20%24(x%2Cy)%20%5Cin%20%5Clbrace%20(x%2Cy)%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5E2%20%7C%20y%20%3D%200%2C%20-2%20%3Cx%20%3C%202%20%5Crbrace%20-%20%5Clbrace%20(x%2Cy)%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5E2%20%7C%20%5C%7C%20(x%2Cy)%20%5C%7C%20%3C%201%20%5Crbrace%24%20%24%3D%20%5Clbrace%20(x%2Cy)%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5E2%20%7C%20y%20%3D0%2C%20x%20%5Cin%20(-2%2C-1%5D%20%5Ccup%20%5B1%2C2)%20%5Crbrace%24%2C%20for%20any%20%24%5Cvarepsilon%20%3E%200%24%2C%20the%20ball%20%24B((x%2Cy)%2C%20%5Cvarepsilon)%24%20is%20not%20contained%20in%20the%20original%20union%20because%20the%20point%20%24(x%2C%5Cvarepsilon%2F2)%24%20is%20not%20in%20the%20union%2C%20thus%20%24(x%2Cy)%24%20not%20in%20the%20interior.%0A%20%20%20%20%09So%20in%20conclusion%2C%20the%20interior%20contains%20all%20%24(x%2Cy)%20%5Cin%20%5Clbrace%20(x%2Cy)%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5E2%20%7C%20%5C%7C%20(x%2Cy)%20%5C%7C%20%3C%201%20%5Crbrace%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%202.%20Use%20the%20result%20below%20(exercise%209)%20the%20closure%20is%20the%20closed%20unit%20disk%20union%20with%20the%20line%20segment%20%24%5B-2%2C2%5D%24%20on%20%24x%24-axis%3B%0A%20%20%20%203.%20The%20boundary%20is%20their%20difference%2C%20that%20is%20the%20unit%20circle%20union%20with%20the%20line%20segments%20%24%5B-2%2C-1%5D%24%20and%20%24%5B1%2C%202%5D%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%209%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**If%20%24A%24%20and%20%24B%24%20are%20subsets%20of%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5Ed%24%2C%20show%20that%20%24%5Coverline%7BA%20%5Ccup%20B%7D%20%3D%20%5Coverline%7BA%7D%20%5Ccup%20%5Coverline%7BB%7D%24.%20Is%20the%20analogous%20statement%20true%20for%20%24A%20%5Ccap%20B%24**%3F%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20For%20any%20%24x%20%5Cin%20%5Coverline%7BA%20%5Ccup%20B%7D%24%2C%20every%20open%20set%20%24U%24%20containing%20%24x%24%20intersects%20%24A%20%5Ccup%20B%24%2C%20thus%20%24U%24%20intersect%20%24A%24%20or%20%24B%24.%20Suppose%20%24x%20%5Cnotin%20%5Coverline%7BA%7D%20%5Ccup%20%5Coverline%7BB%7D%24%2C%20then%20%24x%20%5Cnotin%20%5Coverline%7BA%7D%24%20and%20%24x%20%5Cnotin%20%5Coverline%7BB%7D%24%2C%20then%20%24%5Cexists%20U_A%24%20containing%20%24x%24%20such%20that%20%24U_A%20%5Ccap%20A%20%3D%20%5Cvarnothing%24%20and%20%24%5Cexists%20U_B%24%20containing%20%24x%24%20such%20that%20%24U_B%20%5Ccap%20B%20%3D%20%5Cvarnothing%24.%20Since%20%24x%20%5Cin%20U_A%24%20and%20%24x%20%5Cin%20U_B%24%20thus%20%24U_A%20%5Ccap%20U_B%20%5Cne%20%5Cvarnothing%24%2C%20take%20%24U'%20%3D%20U_A%20%5Ccap%20U_B%24%2C%20then%20%24x%20%5Cin%20U'%24%20and%20%24U'%20%5Ccap%20A%20%3D%20%5Cvarnothing%2C%20U'%20%5Ccap%20B%20%3D%20%5Cvarnothing%24%2C%20which%20is%20a%20contradiction%3B%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Now%20suppose%20%24x%20%5Cin%20%5Coverline%7BA%7D%20%5Ccup%20%5Coverline%7BB%7D%24%2C%20if%20%24x%20%5Cin%20%5Coverline%7BA%7D%24%20then%20%24%5Cforall%20U%24%20open%20set%20containing%20%24x%24%2C%20%24%5Cexists%20x'%20%5Cin%20U%24%20and%20%24x'%20%5Cin%20A%24%2C%20thus%20%24x'%20%5Cin%20A%20%5Ccup%20B%24%20thus%20%24x'%20%5Cin%20U%20%5Ccap%20(A%20%5Ccup%20B)%24%20thus%20%24x%20%5Cin%20%5Coverline%7BA%20%5Ccup%20B%7D%24%3B%20similar%20if%20%24x%20%5Cin%20%5Coverline%7BB%7D%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Thus%20inclusion%20holds%20either%20way%20and%20thus%20equality%20holds.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20The%20analogous%20statement%20is%20generally%20not%20true%2C%20for%20example%2C%20%24A%20%3D%20(0%2C1)%24%20and%20%24B%20%3D%20(1%2C2)%24%20so%20that%20%24A%20%5Ccap%20B%20%3D%20%5Cvarnothing%24%20thus%20%24%5Coverline%7BA%20%5Ccap%20B%7D%20%3D%20%5Cvarnothing%24%2C%20but%20the%20intersection%20of%20their%20closure%20is%20%24%5Clbrace%201%20%5Crbrace%24%20(yet%20we%20do%20have%20the%20%24%5Csubseteq%24%20inclusion).%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%2010%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**If%20%24A%24%20and%20%24B%24%20are%20subsets%20of%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5Ed%24%2C%20prove%20that%20%24(A%20%5Ccap%20B)%5Eo%20%3D%20A%5Eo%20%5Ccap%20B%5Eo%24.%20Is%20the%20analogous%20statement%20true%20for%20%24A%20%5Ccup%20B%24**%3F%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20For%20any%20%24x%20%5Cin%20(A%20%5Ccap%20B)%5Eo%24%2C%20there%20exists%20%24U%24%20of%20%24x%24%20such%20that%20%24U%20%5Csubseteq%20A%20%5Ccap%20B%24%20thus%20%24U%20%5Csubseteq%20A%24%20and%20%24U%20%5Csubseteq%20B%24.%20Meaning%20that%20%24x%24%20is%20in%20the%20interior%20of%20%24A%24%20and%20interior%20of%20%24B%24%20thus%20in%20the%20intersection%20of%20interiors%3B%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Now%20suppose%20%24x%20%5Cin%20A%5Eo%20%5Ccap%20B%5Eo%24%2C%20then%20%24x%20%5Cin%20A%5Eo%20%5Cimplies%20%5Cexists%20U_A(x)%20%5Csubseteq%20A%24%20and%20%24x%20%5Cin%20B%5Eo%20%5Cimplies%20%5Cexists%20U_B(x)%20%5Csubseteq%20B%24.%20Now%20%24U_A%20%5Ccap%20U_B%24%20contains%20%24x%24%20thus%20not%20empty%2C%20is%20a%20neighborhood%20of%20%24x%24%2C%20is%20open%20(finite%20intersection%20of%20open%20sets%20is%20open)%2C%20and%20is%20inside%20%24A%20%5Ccap%20B%24%2C%20thus%20%24x%20%5Cin%20(A%20%5Ccap%20B)%5Eo%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20The%20analogous%20statement%20is%20generally%20not%20true%2C%20with%20a%20similar%20example%2C%20%24A%20%3D%20%5B0%2C1%5D%24%20and%20%24B%20%3D%5B1%2C2%5D%24%2C%20the%20the%20interior%20of%20union%20is%20%24(0%2C2)%24%20but%20the%20union%20of%20interior%20is%20%24(0%2C1)%20%5Ccup%20(1%2C2)%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%2011%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Let%20%24%5Clbrace%20x_n%20%5Crbrace%24%20be%20a%20convergent%20sequence%20in%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5Ed%24%20with%20limit%20%24x%24.%20Set%20%24A%20%3D%20%5Clbrace%20x_1%2C%20%5Cdots%20%5Crbrace%20%5Ccup%20%5Clbrace%20x%20%5Crbrace%24%2C%20show%20that%20%24A%24%20is%20a%20closed%20set**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20We%20want%20to%20prove%20that%20the%20closure%20of%20%24A%24%20is%20itself%2C%20in%20other%20word%2C%20any%20%24y%20%5Cnotin%20A%24%20is%20not%20in%20its%20closure.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Suppose%20not%2C%20and%20we%20have%20a%20%24y%20%5Cnotin%20A%24%20but%20%24y%20%5Cin%20%5Coverline%7BA%7D%24.%20The%20latter%20means%20for%20any%20%24%5Cvarepsilon%24%2C%20%24B(y%2C%5Cvarepsilon)%24%20contains%20some%20elements%20of%20%24A%24.%20If%20%24B(y%2C%20%5Cvarepsilon)%24%20contains%20only%20finitely%20many%20points%20in%20%24A%24%2C%20then%20take%20the%20minimal%20of%20the%20distance%20from%20these%20points%20to%20%24y%24%20as%20the%20new%20%24%5Cvarepsilon%24%2C%20we%20find%20a%20neighborhood%20of%20%24y%24%20that%20does%20not%20contain%20any%20point%20in%20%24A%24%20thus%20%24y%24%20is%20not%20in%20the%20closure.%20Thus%20%24B(y%2C%20%5Cvarepsilon)%24%20must%20contain%20infinitely%20many%20points%20in%20%24A%24%2C%20thus%20infinitely%20many%20points%20in%20%24%5Clbrace%20x_1%2C%20%5Cdots%20%5Crbrace%24.%20But%20then%20since%20it%20works%20for%20all%20%24%5Cvarepsilon%24%2C%20it%20means%20%24y%24%20is%20the%20limit%20of%20%24%5Clbrace%20x_1%2C%20%5Cdots%20%5Crbrace%24%2C%20namely%20%24x%24%2C%20thus%20%24y%24%20is%20in%20%24A%24%2C%20gives%20us%20a%20contradiction.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%2014%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Find%20the%20interior%20and%20closure%20of%20the%20set%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BQ%7D%24%20in%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%20The%20closure%20of%20course%20contains%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BQ%7D%24%2C%20namely%20rational%20numbers%2C%20itself.%20For%20any%20irrational%20number%2C%20we%20know%20that%20any%20neighborhood%20of%20irrationals%20contains%20some%20rational%20numbers%2C%20thus%20all%20irrational%20numbers%20are%20also%20in%20the%20closure%2C%20thus%20%24%5Coverline%7B%5Cmathbb%7BQ%7D%7D%20%3D%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20For%20any%20%24q%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BQ%7D%24%2C%20a%20rational%20number%2C%20we%20know%20also%20that%20any%20neighborhood%20of%20rationals%20contains%20come%20irrationals%2C%20in%20particular%20no%20neighborhood%20of%20%24q%24%20is%20contained%20in%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BQ%7D%24%2C%20thus%20%24q%24%20not%20in%20the%20interior%2C%20thus%20the%20interior%20is%20the%20empty%20set.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%2015%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**If%20%24E%24%20is%20a%20subset%20of%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5Ed%24%2C%20show%20that%20%24(%5Coverline%7BE%7D)%5Ec%20%3D%20(E%5Ec)%5Eo%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Suppose%20%24x%20%5Cin%20(%5Coverline%7BE%7D)%5Ec%24%2C%20that%20is%20%24x%20%5Cnotin%20%5Coverline%7BE%7D%24%2C%20meaning%20that%20there%20exists%20%24U%24%20neighborhood%20of%20%24x%24%20that%20does%20not%20intersect%20with%20%24E%24%2C%20thus%20this%20%24U%24%20is%20contained%20in%20%24E%5Ec%24%2C%20thus%20%24x%24%20is%20in%20the%20interior%20of%20%24E%5Ec%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20This%20argument%20goes%20'if%20and%20only%20if'%20form%20thus%20we%20have%20both%20inclusions.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%20Section%207.4%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%205%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Prove%20that%20if%20%24K%24%20is%20a%20compact%20subset%20of%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5Ed%24%20any%20%24y%24%20is%20a%20point%20of%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5Ed%24%20which%20is%20not%20in%20%24K%24%2C%20then%20there%20is%20a%20closest%20point%20to%20%24y%24%20in%20%24K%24.%20That%20is%2C%20there%20is%20an%20%24x_0%20%5Cin%20K%24%20such%20that%20%24%5C%7C%20x_0%20-%20y%20%5C%7C%20%5Cle%20%5C%7C%20xy%20%5C%7C%24%20for%20all%20%24x%20%5Cin%20K%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Consider%20the%20function%20%24f%3A%20K%20%5Cto%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%2C%20k%20%5Cmapsto%20%5C%7C%20k%20-%20y%20%5C%7C%24.%20This%20is%20a%20composition%20of%20continuous%20functions%20thus%20continuous.%20More%20over%2C%20%24K%20%5Csubseteq%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5Ed%24%20is%20compact%20thus%20closed%20and%20bounded%2C%20so%20that%20%24f%24%2C%20a%20continuous%20function%20on%20closed%20and%20bounded%20set%20in%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5Ed%24%20attains%20its%20minimum%2C%20take%20that%20%24k%24%20and%20that%20is%20the%20%24x_0%24%20we%20want.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%207%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Prove%20that%20if%20%24K_1%2C%20K_2%24%20is%20a%20disjoint%20pair%20of%20compact%20sets%2C%20then%20there%20exists%20a%20disjoint%20pair%20of%20open%20sets%20%24V_1%2C%20V_2%24%20such%20that%20%24K_1%20%5Csubseteq%20V_1%24%20and%20%24K_2%20%5Csubseteq%20V_2%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20By%20the%20above%20exercise%20we%20know%20that%20for%20each%20point%20%24k_i%5E1%24%20in%20%24K_1%24%20we%20can%20always%20find%20its%20minimal%20distance%20to%20%24K_2%24%2C%20denote%20it%20%24%5Cvarepsilon_%7Bk_i%5E1%7D%24%2C%20similarly%2C%20for%20each%20point%20%24k_j%5E2%20%5Cin%20K_2%24%20we%20can%20find%20its%20minimal%20distance%20to%20%24K_1%24%2C%20denote%20it%20%24%5Cvarepsilon_%7Bk_j%5E2%7D%24.%20Now%20consider%20the%20union%20%24V_1%20%3D%20%5Cbigcup%5Climits_i%20B(k_i%5E1%2C%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B3%7D%5Cvarepsilon_%7Bk_i%5E1%7D)%24%20over%20all%20%24k_i%5E1%20%5Cin%20K_1%24%20and%20%24V_2%20%3D%20%5Cbigcup%5Climits_j%20B(k_j%5E2%2C%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B3%7D%5Cvarepsilon_%7Bk_j%5E2%7D)%24%20over%20all%20%24k_j%5E2%20%5Cin%20K_2%24.%20%24V_1%24%20and%20%24V_2%24%20are%20both%20unions%20of%20open%20sets%20thus%20open.%20And%20they%20are%20disjoint%20thus%20they%20are%20the%20sets%20we%20are%20looking%20for%3A%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Suppose%20they%20are%20not%20disjoint%2C%20then%20there%20exists%20%24k%24%20such%20that%20for%20some%20%24i%2C%20j%24%2C%20%24d(k_i%5E1%2C%20k_j%5E2)%20%5Cle%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B3%7D%5Cvarepsilon_%7Bk_j%5E2%7D%20%2B%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B3%7D%5Cvarepsilon_%7Bk_i%5E1%7D%24%2C%20WLOG%20say%20%24%5Cvarepsilon_%7Bk_i%5E1%7D%24%20is%20larger%20than%20%24%5Cvarepsilon_%7Bk_j%5E2%7D%24%2C%20then%20%24d(k_i%5E1%2C%20k_j%5E2)%20%5Cle%20%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7B3%7D%5Cvarepsilon_%7Bk_i%5E1%7D%20%3C%20%5Cvarepsilon_%7Bk_i%5E1%7D%24%2C%20but%20that%20means%20the%20distance%20from%20%24K_2%24%20to%20%24k_1%24%20is%20less%20than%20the%20minimal%20distance%20we%20had%20before%2C%20gives%20us%20a%20contradiction.%0A%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%208%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Prove%20that%20a%20set%20%24K%20%5Csubseteq%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5Ed%24%20is%20compact%20if%20and%20only%20if%20every%20sequence%20in%20%24K%24%20has%20a%20subsequence%20which%20converges%20to%20an%20element%20of%20%24K%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20The%20set%20%24K%24%20is%20by%20assumption%20bounded%2C%20thus%20every%20sequence%20in%20it%20is%20clearly%20also%20bounded%2C%20thus%20has%20a%20convergent%20subsequence.%20Now%20use%20that%20%24K%24%20is%20closed%2C%20thus%20contains%20every%20limit%20points%2C%20thus%20the%20convergent%20subsequence%20described%20just%20now%20converges%20to%20an%20element%20within%20%24K%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%209%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Show%20that%20it%20is%20true%20that%20the%20union%20of%20any%20finite%20collection%20of%20compact%20subsets%20of%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5Ed%24%20is%20compact%2C%20but%20it%20is%20not%20true%20that%20the%20union%20of%20an%20infinite%20collection%20of%20compact%20subsets%20is%20necessarily%20compact**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Let%20%24%5Ccup%20U_i%24%20be%20an%20arbitrary%20open%20cover%20for%20the%20finite%20union%20%24%5Cbigcup%5Climits_%7Bi%3D1%7D%5E%7Bn%7D%20K_i%24%20of%20compact%20sets.%20Since%20it%20covers%20the%20union%20of%20course%20it%20covers%20each%20%24K_i%24.%20Since%20each%20%24K_i%24%20is%20compact%2C%20%24%5Ccup%20U_i%24%20admits%20a%20finite%20cover%20%24%5Cbigcup%5Climits_%7Bj%3D1%7D%5E%7Bn_%7BK_i%7D%7D%20U%5E%7BK_i%7D_j%24%20to%20cover%20%24K_i%24.%20Thus%20%24%5Cbigcup%5Climits_%7Bi%20%3D%201%7D%5En%20%5Cbigcup%5Climits_%7Bj%3D1%7D%5E%7Bn_%7BK_i%7D%7D%20U%5E%7BK_i%7D_j%24%20can%20be%20used%20to%20cover%20%24%5Cbigcup%5Climits_%7Bi%3D1%7D%5E%7Bn%7D%20K_i%24.%20It%20is%20a%20finite%20sub-cover%20of%20%24%5Ccup%20U_i%24%20(summation%20of%20finitely%20many%20finite%20terms%20is%20finite)%2C%20and%20since%20%24%5Ccup%20U_i%24%20is%20arbitrary%2C%20%24%5Cbigcup%5Climits_%7Bi%3D1%7D%5En%20K_i%24%20is%20compact.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20For%20infinite%20collection%2C%20consider%20the%20union%20%24%5Cbigcup%5Climits_i%20%5Bi%2Ci%2B1%5D%20%3D%20%5Cdots%20%5Ccup%20%5B-2%2C-1%5D%20%5Ccup%20%5B-1%2C0%5D%20%5Ccup%20%5B0%2C1%5D%20%5Ccup%20%5Cdots%24%2C%20each%20%24%5Bi%2Ci%2B1%5D%24%20is%20compact%20but%20their%20union%2C%20which%20is%20the%20entire%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%24%2C%20is%20not.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%2010%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Prove%20that%20if%20%24A%24%20and%20%24B%24%20are%20compact%20subsets%20of%20a%20metric%20space%2C%20then%20%24A%20%5Ccup%20B%24%20and%20%24A%20%5Ccap%20B%24%20are%20also%20compact**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20By%20above%2C%20%24A%20%5Ccup%20B%24%20is%20a%20union%20of%20finitely%20many%20compact%20sets%20thus%20compact%20(we%20did%20not%20use%20the%20fact%20we%20were%20working%20in%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5Ed%24%20in%20above%20argument).%0A%0A%20%20%20%20By%20the%20book%20any%20compact%20subset%20of%20a%20metric%20space%20is%20closed%20(the%20book%20proved%20for%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5Ed%24%2C%20but%20only%20used%20the%20fact%20we%20are%20in%20a%20metric%20space)%2C%20thus%20%24A%24%20and%20%24B%24%20are%20closed%2C%20thus%20their%20intersection%20%24A%20%5Ccap%20B%24%20is%20closed%2C%20and%20thus%20%24A%20%5Ccap%20B%24%20is%20a%20closed%20subset%20of%20compact%20set%20%24A%24%20thus%20compact.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%2013%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Prove%20that%20a%20compact%20metric%20space%20is%20complete%20(every%20Cauchy%20sequence%20converges)**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20If%20we%20are%20allowed%20to%20use%20other%20exercise's%20result%20(no.%2011%20in%20particular)%20the%20result%20is%20pretty%20straight-forward%3A%20every%20compact%20metric%20space%20is%20sequentially%20compact%2C%20a%20Cauchy%20sequence%20is%20of%20course%20a%20sequence%2C%20thus%20has%20convergent%20subsequence%2C%20thus%20converges%3A%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Suppose%20%24(x_n)%24%20is%20a%20Cauchy%20sequence%20with%20convergent%20subsequence%20%24(x_%7Bn_k%7D)%20%5Cto%20x%24%2C%20then%20for%20any%20%24%5Cvarepsilon%20%3E%200%24%2C%20choose%20%24N%24%20large%20enough%20such%20that%20%24d(x%2Cx_%7Bn_k%7D)%20%5Cle%20%5Cvarepsilon%2F3%24%20(this%20is%20from%20convergence%20of%20subsequence)%20and%20%24d(x_n%2C%20x_%7Bn_k%7D)%20%5Cle%20%5Cvarepsilon%2F3%24%20(from%20Cauchy)%2C%20for%20%24n_k%20%3E%20n%20%3E%20N%24%2C%20and%20thus%20%24d(x%2C%20x_n)%24%20is%20less%20than%20%24%5Cvarepsilon%24%20by%20triangle%20inequality.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%20of%2011.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Suppose%20%24(X%2Cd)%24%20is%20a%20compact%20metric%20space%20that%20is%20not%20sequentially%20compact%2C%20then%20there%20is%20a%20sequence%20%24(a_i)%24%20in%20%24X%24%20has%20no%20convergent%20subsequence.%20Thus%20%24(a_i)%24%20contains%20infinitely%20many%20distinct%20points%20(otherwise%20choose%20those%20infinitely%20many%20non-distinct%20points%20and%20we%20have%20a%20constant%20subsequence%20which%20is%20convergent).%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Now%20let%20%24x%20%5Cin%20X%24%20be%20an%20arbitrary%20point%2C%20if%20for%20any%20%24%5Cvarepsilon%24%20the%20ball%20%24B(x%2C%20%5Cvarepsilon)%24%20contains%20a%20point%20from%20%24(a_i)%24%20(except%20for%20%24x%24%20itself)%2C%20then%20by%20choosing%20%24%5Cvarepsilon%20%3D%201%2C%201%2F2%2C%201%2F3%2C%20%5Cdots%24%20and%20pick%20point%20in%20%24(a_i)%24%20in%20the%20ball%20we%20have%20a%20convergent%20subsequence%20of%20%24(a_i)%24%2C%20which%20is%20by%20assumption%20does%20not%20exists%2C%20thus%20we%20have%20the%20negation%3A%20there%20is%20some%20%24%5Cvarepsilon_x%24%20(for%20the%20particular%20%24x%24)%20such%20that%20%24B(x%2C%20%5Cvarepsilon_x)%24%20does%20not%20contain%20any%20%24(a_i)%24%20other%20than%20possibly%20%24x%24%20itself.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Since%20%24x%24%20is%20arbitrary%2C%20consider%20the%20union%20%24%5Cbigcup%5Climits_x%20B(x%2C%20%5Cvarepsilon_x)%24%2C%20this%20is%20an%20open%20cover%20for%20compact%20%24X%24%2C%20thus%20admit%20a%20finite%20sub-cover.%20But%20then%20each%20%24B(x%2C%20%5Cvarepsilon_x)%24%20contains%20at%20most%20one%20point%20in%20%24(a_i)%24%2C%20thus%20a%20finite%20union%20of%20them%20contains%20only%20finitely%20many%20%24a_i%24%2C%20that%20is%2C%20%24(a_i)%24%20contains%20only%20finitely%20many%20distinct%20point%2C%20we%20have%20a%20contradiction.%0A%20%20%20%20%22%22%22)%0A%20%20%20%20return%0A%0A%0A%40app.cell%0Adef%20_(mo)%3A%0A%20%20%20%20mo.md(r%22%22%22%0A%20%20%20%20%23%20Spring%20Semester%20Homework%208%0A%20%20%20%20%22%22%22)%0A%20%20%20%20return%0A%0A%0A%40app.cell%0Adef%20_(mo)%3A%0A%20%20%20%20mo.md(r%22%22%22%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%20Section%207.5%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%204%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Tell%20whether%20or%20not%20the%20set%20%24A%24%20is%20connected%2C%20if%20%24A%24%20is%20not%20connected%2C%20describe%20its%20connected%20components%3A%20%24A%20%3D%20%5Clbrace%20(x%2Cy)%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5E2%20%7C%201%3C%20%5C%7C%20(x%2Cy)%20%5C%7C%20%3C2%20%5Crbrace%20%5Ccup%20%5Clbrace%20(x%2Cy)%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5E2%20%7C%20%5C%7C%20(x%2Cy)%20%5C%7C%20%3C1%20%5Crbrace%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%20The%20two%20sets%20in%20the%20description%20of%20%24A%24%20are%20disjoint%2C%20non-empty%2C%20and%20open%2C%20so%20they%20themselves%20form%20a%20separation%20for%20%24A%24%2C%20thus%20%24A%24%20is%20not%20connected%2C%20the%20connected%20components%20are%20exactly%20that%20two%20sets.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%206%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Prove%20that%20the%20union%20of%20a%20collection%20of%20connected%20subsets%20of%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5Ed%24%20with%20a%20point%20in%20common%20is%20also%20connected**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Let%20us%20call%20that%20point%20%24p%24%2C%20the%20collection%20of%20connected%20sets%20are%20%24C_i%24%20indexed%20by%20%24i%24%2C%20and%20suppose%20in%20contrast%20that%20their%20union%20%24%5Ccup%20C_i%24%20is%20not%20connected.%20By%20definition%20that%20means%20%24%5Ccup%20C_i%20%3D%20U%20%5Ccup%20V%24%20is%20a%20separation.%20By%20assumption%20%24p%20%5Cin%20%5Ccup%20C_i%24%20so%20%24p%24%20is%20either%20in%20%24U%24%20or%20%24V%24.%20WLOG%20say%20%24p%20%5Cin%20U%24.%20Now%20%24C_1%24%20contains%20%24p%24%2C%20if%20%24C_1%24%20has%20an%20point%20lie%20inside%20%24V%24%2C%20then%20by%20definition%2C%20%24U%5Ccap%20C_1%2CV%20%5Ccap%20C_1%24%20form%20a%20separation%20for%20%24C_1%24%2C%20but%20that%20is%20impossible%20because%20it%20is%20connected%2C%20thus%20%24C_1%24%20lies%20entirely%20in%20%24U%24.%20This%20works%20for%20all%20%24i%24.%20Thus%20%24C_i%24%20lies%20entirely%20in%20%24U%24%20for%20all%20%24i%24%2C%20meaning%20that%20%24%5Ccup%20C_i%20%5Csubseteq%20U%24%20and%20%24%5Ccup%20C_i%20%5Ccap%20V%20%3D%20%5Cvarnothing%24%2C%20thus%20%24U%2CV%24%20are%20not%20a%20separation%20anyway.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%209%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Prove%20that%20if%20%24E%24%20is%20an%20open%20connected%20subset%20of%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5Ed%24%2C%20then%20each%20pair%20of%20points%20in%20%24E%24%20can%20be%20connected%20by%20piece-wise%20linear%20path%20in%20%24E%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Consider%20the%20relation%20on%20%24E%24%20that%20%24a%20%5Csim%20b%24%20if%20and%20only%20if%20they%20can%20be%20connected%20by%20piece-wise%20linear%20path.%20This%20is%20an%20equivalence%20relation%3A%0A%0A%20%20%20%201.%20%24a%5Csim%20a%24%20for%20any%20%24a%24%2C%20because%20a%20point%20is%20in%20some%20sense%20'linear'%3B%0A%20%20%20%202.%20If%20%24a%20%5Csim%20b%24%20then%20%24b%20%5Csim%20a%24%2C%20use%20the%20same%20path%3B%0A%20%20%20%203.%20If%20%24a%20%5Csim%20b%24%20and%20%24b%20%5Csim%20c%24%2C%20then%20connect%20the%20two%20path%20we%20have%20a%20piece%20wise%20linear%20path%20connecting%20%24a%24%20and%20%24c%24%20thus%20%24a%20%5Csim%20c%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Now%20fix%20some%20%24a%20%5Cin%20E%24%2C%20its%20equivalence%20class%20%24%5Coverline%7Ba%7D%24%20is%20open%3A%20for%20any%20%24p%20%5Cin%20%5Coverline%7Ba%7D%20%5Csubseteq%20E%24%2C%20which%20means%20%24p%24%20is%20in%20an%20open%20set%20in%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5Ed%24%2C%20thus%20we%20can%20find%20%24B(p%2C%5Cvarepsilon)%20%5Csubseteq%20E%24.%20For%20any%20%24q%20%5Cin%20B(p%2C%5Cvarepsilon)%24%2C%20simply%20draw%20a%20straight%20line%20between%20%24p%24%20and%20%24q%24%20and%20we%20have%20a%20(piece-wise)%20linear%20path%20between%20them%2C%20thus%20%24B(p%2C%20%5Cvarepsilon)%20%5Csubseteq%20%5Coverline%7Ba%7D%24.%20Since%20that%20works%20for%20arbitrary%20%24p%24%2C%20it%20means%20%24%5Coverline%7Ba%7D%24%20is%20open.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20The%20equivalence%20class%20is%20also%20closed%3A%20because%20equivalence%20classes%20form%20a%20partition%20for%20%24E%24%2C%20thus%20%24E-%5Coverline%7Ba%7D%24%20is%20union%20of%20equivalence%20classes%2C%20in%20particular%20%24E-%5Coverline%7Ba%7D%24%20is%20union%20of%20open%20sets%20thus%20open%2C%20thus%20%24%5Coverline%7Ba%7D%24%20is%20closed.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Since%20the%20only%20sets%20that%20are%20both%20open%20and%20closed%20in%20a%20connected%20set%20is%20the%20set%20itself%20and%20the%20empty%20set%2C%20it%20means%20we%20only%20have%20one%20non-trivial%20equivalence%20class%20%24%5Coverline%7Ba%7D%24%2C%20which%20means%20every%20point%20has%20a%20piece-wise%20linear%20path%20connecting%20to%20%24a%24%2C%20and%20thus%20each%20pair%20of%20points%20have%20a%20piece-wise%20linear%20path%20connecting%20them.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%20Section%208.2%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%201%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**If%20%24A%20%3D%20%5Clbrace%20(x%2Cy)%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5E2%20%7C%200%5Cle%20x%20%5Cle%201%2C%200%20%5Cle%20y%20%5Cle%201%20%5Crbrace%24%2C%20which%20of%20the%20following%20sets%20cannot%20be%20the%20image%20of%20the%20set%20%24A%24%20under%20a%20continuous%20function%20%24F%3A%20A%20%5Cto%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5E2%24**%3F%0A%0A%20%20%20%201.%20%24%5Coverline%7BB_2(0%2C0)%7D%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%202.%20%24B_1(0)%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%203.%20%24%5Clbrace%20(x%2Cy)%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5E2%20%7C%200%5Cle%20x%20%5Cle%201%2C%200%20%5Cle%20y%20%5Crbrace%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%204.%20%24%5Coverline%7BB_1(0%2C0)%7D%20%5Ccup%20%5Coverline%7BB_1(3%2C0)%7D%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%205.%20%24%5Clbrace%20(t%2Ct)%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5E2%20%7C%20t%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%2C%200%20%5Cle%20t%20%5Cle%201%20%5Crbrace%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%201.%20It%20can%20be%2C%20for%20some%20function%20like%20%24(x%2Cy)%20%5Cmapsto%20(%5Cfrac%7Bx%7D%7B%5Csqrt%7Bx%5E2%2By%5E2%7D%7D%2C%20%5Cfrac%7By%7D%7B%5Csqrt%7Bx%5E2%2By%5E2%7D%7D)%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%202.%20No%2C%20because%20the%20image%20of%20compact%20set%20must%20be%20compact%20(in%20particular%2C%20closed)%20under%20continuous%20map%3B%0A%20%20%20%203.%20No%2C%20because%20the%20image%20of%20compact%20set%20must%20be%20compact%20(in%20particular%2C%20bounded)%20under%20continuous%20map%3B%0A%20%20%20%204.%20No%2C%20because%20the%20image%20of%20connected%20set%20must%20be%20connected%20under%20continuous%20map%3B%0A%20%20%20%205.%20It%20can%20be%2C%20just%20use%20the%20projection%20map.%20But%20there%20is%20no%20continuous%20injection.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%204%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**If%20%24F%3A%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5Ep%20%5Cto%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5Eq%24%20is%20continuous%20and%20%24A%24%20is%20a%20bounded%20subset%20of%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5Ep%24%2C%20prove%20that%20%24%5Coverline%7BF(A)%7D%20%3D%20F(%5Coverline%7BA%7D)%24.%20Is%20this%20necessarily%20true%20if%20%24A%24%20is%20not%20bounded**%3F%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%201.%20The%20first%20inclusion%3A%20%24%5Coverline%7BF(A)%7D%20%5Csubseteq%20F(%5Coverline%7BA%7D)%24%3A%20because%20%24F(%5Coverline%7BA%7D)%24%20clearly%20contains%20%24F(A)%24%2C%20and%20%24F(%5Coverline%7BA%7D)%24%20is%20image%20of%20closed%20and%20bounded%2C%20i.e.%20compact%20set%20thus%20compact%2C%20thus%20closed.%20But%20%24%5Coverline%7BF(A)%7D%24%20is%20by%20definition%20the%20smallest%20closet%20set%20containing%20%24F(A)%24%2C%20thus%20it%20must%20be%20contained%20in%20%24F(%5Coverline%7BA%7D)%24%3B%0A%20%20%20%202.%20The%20other%20way%20around%3A%20consider%20%24F%5E%7B-1%7D(%5Coverline%7BF(A)%7D)%24%2C%20it%20is%20the%20preimage%20of%20a%20closed%20set%20under%20a%20continuous%20function%2C%20thus%20closed.%20By%20property%20of%20functions%2C%20it%20also%20contains%20%24A%24%2C%20thus%20it%20contains%20%24%5Coverline%7BA%7D%24%20following%20a%20similar%20argument%20as%20above%2C%20i.e.%20%24F%5E%7B-1%7D(%5Coverline%7BF(A)%7D)%20%5Csupseteq%20%5Coverline%7BA%7D%24%2C%20but%20then%20%24%5Coverline%7BF(A)%7D%20%5Csupseteq%20F(F%5E%7B-1%7D(%5Coverline%7BF(A)%7D))%20%5Csupseteq%20F(%5Coverline%7BA%7D)%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20If%20we%20don't%20have%20boundedness%20then%20it%20may%20not%20true%2C%20for%20example%2C%20take%20%24A%20%3D%20%5B0%2C%5Cinfty)%24%20and%20consider%20the%20function%20%24F%3A%20x%5Cmapsto%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bx%5E2%2B1%7D%24%2C%20then%20%24%5Coverline%7BF(A)%7D%3D%5B0%2C1%5D%24%20but%20%24F(%5Coverline%7BA%7D)%20%3D%20(0%2C1%5D%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%205%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**The%20image%20of%20a%20compact%20set%20under%20a%20continuous%20function%20is%20compact%2C%20hence%20closed.%20Is%20the%20image%20of%20a%20closed%20set%20under%20a%20continuous%20function%20necessarily%20closed**%3F%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%20No%2C%20just%20use%20the%20above%20example%20%24f%3A%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%20%5Cto%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%2C%20x%20%5Cto%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bx%5E2%2B1%7D%24%2C%20the%20image%20is%20%24(0%2C1%5D%24%20is%20not%20closed%20(also%20not%20open).%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%207%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Is%20the%20sphere%20%24%5Clbrace%20(x%2Cy%2Cz)%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5E3%20%7C%20x%5E2%2By%5E2%2Bz%5E2%20%3D%201%20%5Crbrace%24%20connected%3F%20How%20do%20you%20know**%3F%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%20In%20a%20very%20informal%20way%3A%20the%20(surface%20of)%20Earth%20is%20(approximately)%20such%20a%20sphere%2C%20and%20we%20can%20move%20freely%20from%20any%20place%20to%20any%20other%20place%20continuously%20(say%20we%20are%20taking%20an%20air%20jet%E2%80%A6)%2C%20thus%20such%20surface%20is%20path-connected%20thus%20connected.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%20Section%209.1%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%208%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**If%20%24p%3E0%24%2C%20let%20%24f%24%20be%20the%20function%20%24f(x%2Cy)%20%3D%20%5Cbegin%7Bcases%7D%20%5Cfrac%7Bx%5E2%7D%7B(x%5E2%2By%5E2)%5Ep%7D%2C%26%20(x%2Cy)%20%5Cne%20(0%2C0)%5C%5C%200%2C%26%20(x%2Cy)%20%3D%20(0%2C0)%20%5Cend%7Bcases%7D%24.%20For%20which%20values%20of%20%24p%24%20is%20%24%5Cfrac%7B%5Cpartial%20f%7D%7B%5Cpartial%20x%7D%24%20continuous%20at%20%24(0%2C0)%24**%3F%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Using%20the%20product%20rule%20we%20can%20calculate%20that%20%24%5Cfrac%7B%5Cpartial%20f(x%2Cy)%7D%7B%5Cpartial%20x%7D%20%3D%20%5Cbegin%7Bcases%7D%20%5Cfrac%7B2x(x%5E2%2By%5E2)-2px%5E3%7D%7B(x%5E2%2By%5E2)%5E%7Bp%2B1%7D%7D%2C%26%20(x%2Cy)%20%5Cne%20(0%2C0)%5C%5C%200%2C%26%20(x%2Cy)%20%3D%20(0%2C0)%20%5Cend%7Bcases%7D%24.%20In%20order%20to%20make%20it%20continuous%20we%20basically%20require%20the%20power%20in%20the%20bottom%20be%20smaller%2C%20i.e.%20%240%20%3C%20p%20%3C%201%2F2%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%209%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**If%20%24f%24%20is%20the%20function%20%24f(x%2Cy)%20%3D%20%5Cbegin%7Bcases%7D%20%5Cfrac%7Bx%5E3y-xy%5E3%7D%7Bx%5E2%2By%5E2%7D%2C%26%20(x%2Cy)%20%5Cne%20(0%2C0)%5C%5C%200%2C%26%20(x%2Cy)%20%3D%20(0%2C0)%20%5Cend%7Bcases%7D%24%2C%20show%20by%20direct%20calculation%20that%20%24%5Cfrac%7B%5Cpartial%5E2%20f%7D%7B%5Cpartial%20x%20%5Cpartial%20y%7D%24%20is%20not%20continuous%20at%20%24(0%2C0)%24%2C%20a%20similar%20calculation%20shows%20that%20%24%5Cfrac%7B%5Cpartial%5E2%20f%7D%7B%5Cpartial%20y%20%5Cpartial%20x%7D%24%20is%20not%20continuous%20at%20%24(0%2C0)%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%20we%20may%20calculate%20that%20%24%5Cfrac%7B%5Cpartial%20f(x%2Cy)%7D%7B%5Cpartial%20y%7D%20%3D%20%5Cbegin%7Bcases%7D%20%5Cfrac%7Bx%5E3-3xy%5E2%7D%7Bx%5E2%2By%5E2%7D-%5Cfrac%7B(2x%5E3y%5E2-2xy%5E4)%7D%7B(x%5E2%2By%5E2)%5E2%7D%2C%26%20(x%2Cy)%20%5Cne%20(0%2C0)%5C%5C%200%2C%26%20(x%2Cy)%20%3D%20(0%2C0)%20%5Cend%7Bcases%7D%24.%20This%20is%20continuous.%20And%20then%20%24%5Cfrac%7B%5Cpartial%5E2%20f(x%2Cy)%7D%7B%5Cpartial%20x%20%5Cpartial%20y%7D%20%3D%20%5Cbegin%7Bcases%7D%20%5Cfrac%7B3x%5E2-3y%5E2%7D%7Bx%5E2%2By%5E2%7D-%5Cfrac%7Bx%5E3-3xy%5E2%7D%7B(x%5E2%2By%5E2)%5E2%7D-%5Cfrac%7B6x%5E2y%5E2-2y%5E4%7D%7B(x%5E2%2By%5E2)%5E2%7D%2B%5Cfrac%7B8x%5E3y%5E3-8xy%5E5%7D%7B(x%5E2%2By%5E2)%5E3%7D%2C%26%20(x%2Cy)%20%5Cne%20(0%2C0)%5C%5C%200%2C%26%20(x%2Cy)%20%3D%20(0%2C0)%20%5Cend%7Bcases%7D%24%2C%20we%20can%20see%20from%20the%20power%20that%20it%20is%20not%20continuous%20at%20%24(0%2C0)%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Also%20we%20may%20calculate%20that%20%24%5Cfrac%7B%5Cpartial%20f(x%2Cy)%7D%7B%5Cpartial%20x%7D%20%3D%20%5Cbegin%7Bcases%7D%20%5Cfrac%7B3x%5E2y-y%5E3%7D%7Bx%5E2%2By%5E2%7D-%5Cfrac%7B2x%5E4y-2x%5E2y%5E3%7D%7B(x%5E2%2By%5E2)%5E2%7D%2C%26%20(x%2Cy)%20%5Cne%20(0%2C0)%5C%5C%200%2C%26%20(x%2Cy)%20%3D%20(0%2C0)%20%5Cend%7Bcases%7D%24.%20This%20is%20continuous.%20And%20then%20%24%5Cfrac%7B%5Cpartial%5E2%20f(x%2Cy)%7D%7B%5Cpartial%20y%20%5Cpartial%20x%7D%20%3D%20%5Cbegin%7Bcases%7D%20%5Cfrac%7B3x%5E2-3y%5E2%7D%7Bx%5E2%2By%5E2%7D-%5Cfrac%7B3x%5E2y-y%5E3%7D%7B(x%5E2%2By%5E2)%5E2%7D-%5Cfrac%7B2x%5E4-6x%5E2y%5E2%7D%7B(x%5E2%2By%5E2)%5E2%7D%2B%5Cfrac%7B8x%5E5y-8x%5E3y%5E3%7D%7B(x%5E2%2By%5E2)%5E3%7D%2C%26%20(x%2Cy)%20%5Cne%20(0%2C0)%5C%5C%200%2C%26%20(x%2Cy)%20%3D%20(0%2C0)%20%5Cend%7Bcases%7D%24%2C%20since%20the%20original%20function%20is%20kind%20of%20'symmetric'%2C%20those%20calculations%20are%20the%20same%2C%20just%20interchange%20the%20sign%20and%20%24x%2Cy%24.%20We%20can%20also%20see%20from%20the%20power%20that%20it%20is%20not%20continuous%20at%20%24(0%2C0)%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%20Section%209.2%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%207%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Prove%20that%20if%20%24f%24%20is%20a%20real%20valued%20function%20defined%20on%20an%20open%20interval%20containing%20%24a%24%20and%20if%20%24S%24%20is%20an%20affine%20function%20such%20that%20%24f(a)%20%3D%20S(a)%24%20and%20%24%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bh%20%5Cto%200%7D%5Cfrac%7Bf(a%2Bh)%20-%20S(a%2Bh)%7D%7Bh%7D%20%3D%200%24%2C%20then%20%24S(a%2Bh)%20%3D%20f(a)%20%2B%20f'(a)h%24**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%24S%3A%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%20%5Cto%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%24%20is%20affine%2C%20so%20it%20has%20the%20form%20%24S(a%2Bh)%24%20%24%3D%20S(a)%20%2B%20hC%20%3D%24%20%24f(a)%2BhC%24.%20The%20latter%20part%20%24hC%20%3D%20L(h)%24%20is%20by%20definition%20linear.%20By%20assumption%20we%20have%20%240%20%3D%20%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bh%20%5Cto%200%7D%5Cfrac%7Bf(a%2Bh)%20-%20S(a%2Bh)%7D%7Bh%7D%24%20%24%3D%20%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bh%20%5Cto%200%7D%5Cfrac%7Bf(a%2Bh)%20-%20f(a)%20-%20L(h)%7D%7Bh%7D%24%2C%20domain%20is%20an%20open%20interval%20so%20every%20point%20is%20an%20interior%20point%2C%20thus%20by%20definition%20%24f%24%20is%20differentiable%20at%20every%20%24a%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20That%20is%20to%20say%20%24f'%24%20does%20exist%2C%20and%20by%20definition%20%24f'(a)%20%3D%20%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bh%20%5Cto%200%7D%5Cfrac%7Bf(a%2Bh)%20-%20f(a)%7D%7Bh%7D%24%2C%20thus%20%24%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bh%20%5Cto%200%7D(f(a)%20%2B%20f'(a)h)%24%20%24%3D%20%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bh%20%5Cto%200%7D(f(a)%20%2B%20f(a%2Bh)%20-%20f(a))%24%20%24%3D%20%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bh%20%5Cto%200%7Df(a%2Bh)%24%3B%20on%20the%20other%20hand%2C%20by%20assumption%20%24%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bh%20%5Cto%200%7D%5Cfrac%7Bf(a%2Bh)%20-%20S(a%2Bh)%7D%7Bh%7D%20%3D%200%24%20thus%20%24%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bh%20%5Cto%200%7D(f(a%2Bh)%20-%20S(a%2Bh))%20%3D%200%24%20thus%20%24%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bh%20%5Cto%200%7Df(a%2Bh)%20%3D%20%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bh%20%5Cto%200%7DS(a%2Bh)%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20So%20we%20have%20the%20equality%20when%20sending%20%24h%20%5Cto%200%24%2C%20but%20%24S(a%2Bh)%20%3D%20f(a)%2BhC%24%20is%20affine%2C%20since%20by%20above%20%24C%20%3D%20f'(a)%24%20when%20%24h%24%20is%20small%2C%20it%20means%20%24S(a%2Bh)%20%3D%20f(a)%20%2B%20h%20f'(a)%24%20for%20all%20%24h%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%2010%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Does%20the%20function%20defined%20by%20%24f(x%2Cy)%20%3D%20%5Cbegin%7Bcases%7D%20%5Cfrac%7Bx%5E3%7D%7Bx%5E2%2By%5E2%7D%2C%26%20(x%2Cy)%20%5Cne%20(0%2C0)%5C%5C%200%2C%26%20(x%2Cy)%20%3D%20(0%2C0)%20%5Cend%7Bcases%7D%24%20have%20first%20order%20partial%20derivative%20at%20every%20point%20of%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5E2%24%3F%20Is%20this%20function%20differentiable%20at%20%24(0%2C0)%24**%3F%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Solution%0A%0A%20%20%20%20For%20points%20other%20than%20%240%24%20we%20can%20just%20calculate%20the%20partial%20derivative%20in%20a%20usual%20way.%20At%20zero%3A%20with%20respect%20to%20%24x%24%2C%20fix%20%24y%20%3D%200%24%20the%20function%20near%20%240%24%20becomes%20%24%3D%20x%5E3%2Fx%5E2%20%3D%20x%24%2C%20thus%20%24%5Cfrac%7B%5Cpartial%20f%7D%7B%5Cpartial%20x%7D(0%2C0)%20%3D%20%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bh%20%5Cto%200%7D%5Cfrac%7Bf(h%2C0)-f(0%2C0)%7D%7Bh%7D%20%3D%20%5Clim%5Climits%20%5Cfrac%7Bh%7D%7Bh%7D%20%3D%201%24.%20With%20respect%20to%20%24y%24%2C%20fix%20%24x%20%3D%200%24%20the%20function%20near%20%240%24%20becomes%20constant%20zero%2C%20so%20has%20partial%20derivative%20%240%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20If%20it%20has%20differential%2C%20then%20by%20above%20%24df(0)%20%3D%20(1%2C0)%24.%20Now%20by%20definition%2C%20%24f%24%20is%20differentiable%20if%20there%20is%20some%20linear%20%24L%24%20(which%20would%20be%20%24(1%2C0)%24)%20and%20that%20%24%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bh%20%5Cto%200%7D%5Cfrac%7Bf(h_1%2Ch_2)-f(0%2C0)-L(h_1%2Ch_2)%7D%7B%5C%7C%20h%20%5C%7C%7D%20%3D%200%24%20(say%20%24h%20%3D%20(h_1%2Ch_2)%24%20here).%20We%20can%20calculate%20that%20%24%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bh%20%5Cto%200%7D%5Cfrac%7Bf(h_1%2Ch_2)-f(0%2C0)-L(h_1%2Ch_2)%7D%7B%5C%7C%20h%20%5C%7C%7D%24%20%24%3D%20%5Clim%5Climits%20%5Cfrac%7B%5Cfrac%7Bh_1%5E3%7D%7Bh_1%5E2%2Bh%5E2_2%7D%20-%20h_1%7D%7B%5Csqrt%7Bh_1%5E2%2Bh_2%5E2%7D%7D%20%3D%20%5Clim%5Climits%20%5Cfrac%7B-h_1h_2%5E2%7D%7B(h_1%5E2%2Bh_2%5E2)%5E%7B3%2F2%7D%7D%24%2C%20but%20this%20limit%20does%20not%20exist.%20Thus%20%24f%24%20is%20not%20differentiable%20at%20%240%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%23%23%23%20Exercise%2012%0A%0A%20%20%20%20**Prove%20that%20a%20function%20%24F%3A%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5Ep%20%5Cto%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5Eq%24%20is%20affine%20if%20and%20only%20if%20it%20is%20differentiable%20everywhere%20and%20its%20differential%20matrix%20is%20constant**.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Proof%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Definition%20of%20affine%20function%3A%20%24F%24%20is%20affine%20if%20%24F(x)%20%3D%20b%2BL(x)%24.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20If%20%24F%24%20is%20affine%2C%20then%20%24%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bh%20%5Cto%200%7D%5Cfrac%7BF(a%2Bh)-F(a)-L(h)%7D%7B%5C%7C%20h%20%5C%7C%7D%24%20(for%20any%20%24a%24)%20would%20be%20constant%20zero%20if%20we%20just%20take%20the%20%24L%24%20as%20in%20the%20definition%20of%20our%20affine%20function%3A%20%24%5Cfrac%7BF(a%2Bh)-F(a)-L(h)%7D%7B%5C%7C%20h%20%5C%7C%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7Bb%2BL(a%2Bh)-b-L(a)-L(h)%7D%7B%5C%7C%20h%20%5C%7C%7D%20%3D%200%24%20since%20%24L%24%20is%20by%20definition%20linear.%20Now%20this%20%24L%24%2C%20which%20by%20assumption%20is%20independent%20from%20the%20choice%20of%20%24a%24%2C%20is%20our%20differential%20matrix%2C%20and%20thus%20it%20is%20constant.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Conversely%20we%20have%20that%20%24%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bh%20%5Cto%200%7D%5Cfrac%7BF(a%2Bh)-F(a)-L(h)%7D%7B%5C%7C%20h%20%5C%7C%7D%20%3D%200%24%20for%20some%20linear%20%24L%24%20for%20all%20%24a%24.%20Consider%20%24G%3A%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5Ep%20%5Cto%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5Eq%24%20given%20by%20%24G(x)%20%3D%20F(x)%20-%20L(x)%24%2C%20then%20we%20have%20that%20for%20any%20%24a%24%2C%20%24%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bh%20%5Cto%200%7D%5Cfrac%7BG(a%2Bh)-G(a)%7D%7B%5C%7C%20h%20%5C%7C%7D%24%20%24%3D%5Clim%5Climits%20%5Cfrac%7BF(a%2Bh)-L(a%2Bh)%20-%20F(a)%20%2BL(a)%7D%7B%5C%7C%20h%20%5C%7C%7D%24%20%24%3D%5Clim%5Climits_%7Bh%20%5Cto%200%7D%5Cfrac%7BF(a%2Bh)-F(a)-L(h)%7D%7B%5C%7C%20h%20%5C%7C%7D%20%3D%200%24%2C%20thus%20%24G%24%20is%20differentiable%20everywhere%20with%20the%20differential%20matrix%20being%20constant%20zero.%0A%0A%20%20%20%20Now%20fix%20any%20two%20points%20%24x%2C%20y%20%5Cin%20%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5Ep%24%2C%20the%20whole%20line%20from%20%24x%24%20to%20%24y%24%20is%20also%20inside%20%24%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5Ep%24.%20Let%20us%20consider%20a%20parametrization%20%24r(t)%20%3D%20G(tx%2B(1-t)y)%24%2C%20where%20%24t%20%5Cin%20%5B0%2C1%5D%24.%20Since%20%24G%24%20is%20differentiable%20everywhere%20and%20%24tx%2B(1-t)y%24%20is%20differentiable%20(seeing%20%24x%2Cy%24%20as%20constant)%2C%20we%20can%20use%20the%20Chain%20Rule%20to%20see%20%24r'(t)%20%3D%200%24%20for%20any%20%24t%24%20because%20%24dG(%5Ccdot)%20%5Cequiv%200%24%20by%20above.%20Thus%20%24r%24%20is%20a%20constant%2C%20taking%20%24t%20%3D%200%24%20and%20%241%24%20we%20have%20that%20%24G(x)%20%3D%20G(y)%24.%20Since%20this%20works%20for%20arbitrary%20%24x%2Cy%24%2C%20we%20conclude%20%24G%24%20is%20a%20constant%20map%2C%20and%20then%20%24F%20%3D%20G%2BL%24%20is%20by%20definition%20affine.%0A%20%20%20%20%22%22%22)%0A%20%20%20%20return%0A%0A%0Aif%20__name__%20%3D%3D%20%22__main__%22%3A%0A%20%20%20%20app.run()%0A